×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Variation of the coefficient of consolidation with time

Variation of the coefficient of consolidation with time

Variation of the coefficient of consolidation with time

(OP)
Hello everybody,

Does anyone know anything about the variation of the coefficient of consolidation (Cv) with time (i.e. as consolidation is going on)?
My goal is to obtain a rough estimate of Cv when the consolidation process began, knowing its present value.
Has any study been performed on this question? I couldn't find anything in the literature.
Thank you for your help.

Ben

RE: Variation of the coefficient of consolidation with time

It appears that you are talking about finite-strain theory of consolidation, of which Terzaghi's formulation is a special case in which Cv can be considered near enough to constant (which we know isn't exactly true).  (Terzaghi might not have done it that way if he had access to a PC with a Pentium, or even an 8086.)

I haven't ever seen an analysis where Cv was considered as a variable.  Instead, for finite-strain analysis of plastic mine tailings and dredge spoil, what I have seen is skipping the whole notion of Cv and working with permeability and compressibility directly as fns of void ratio (or K as a fn of e, and e as a fn of sigma'v).  If that's what you need to do, I can dig out refs.  (I worked with tailings and dredge spoil in the '80s, but that stuff is all in boxes.)  

What's the situation you are analyzing?

RE: Variation of the coefficient of consolidation with time

(OP)
I'm actually trying to assess how much the soil (soft clay) has consolidated so far. The problem is that the overload (fill) was placed some 60 years ago and the only values that I have are from last year. I wonder if using the now-value of Cv to calculate T and U (with Terzaghi's theory) makes sense.
So I'm more looking for some sort of correlation between Cv(t=0) and Cv(t=t1).

RE: Variation of the coefficient of consolidation with time

How much fill?  Was the clay normally consolidated before fill placement?  From the consolidation data, how does Cv vary with increasing load?  How much does it vary within your range of working loads, i.e. between prefill eff. stress and postfill eff. stress?  

Cv will change depending on stress levels, so "age" isn't really going to change Cv all that much.  It will vary with stress, and possibly signifcantly in the overconsolidated versus normally consolidated region, so it's important to look at it in the context of your case.

RE: Variation of the coefficient of consolidation with time

First, I'd be a little bit surprised if there was still anything going on with consolidation 60 years after the fill was placed.

Second, I know of no way to project a different Cv backwards in time like that.  To do that, you would need to somehow obtain estimates of K and m-v at the two different times.  I suppose, you could do that, in theory anyway, if you knew the original void ratio and the present values of e, K, and m-v, plus some way of relating K and m-v to void ratio, but I wouldn't recommend that as a real-world solution.

Have you thought about shoving a vibrating wire piezometer into the center of the layer to check for excess pore pressure?   

RE: Variation of the coefficient of consolidation with time

I agree with the piezometer.  It's the only way of really (sort of) knowing what's going on.  If the budget doesn't allow for one, then I'd bet that trying to figure out Cv vs. time is way beyond the level of effort required for what you're doing.

RE: Variation of the coefficient of consolidation with time

Have you done any consolidation testing?  Comparing the "in situ" effective stresses to the test curve's precosolidation pressure can tell you if there is still more consolidation to do.  I'd suggest that you use a loge vs logp plot as a check on the normal Casagrande method.

RE: Variation of the coefficient of consolidation with time

(OP)
CRS-tests have been performed at 3 different depths, and the clay appears to be underconsolidated (the OCR ratio is around 0.8). It might appear strange after so many years but the amount of fill that was placed is about 7m (another problem in this case in the lack of reliable information about the site history).
The Cv values obtained from the CRS-tests are fairly constant with the effective stress (between 10^-7 and 10^-8 m2/s).
Field investigations cannot be performed anymore in this case, but I'll consider it next time.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources