×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

L6 crankshaft balance?
2

L6 crankshaft balance?

L6 crankshaft balance?

(OP)
I'm trying to get a better understanding of how an L6 crankshaft is balanced (not what it does).
Searches turn up nothing useful, including such gems as "in-line engines do not have balance weights" (what's that big thing opposite the pin?), and that L6 engines do not require balance factor compensation for reciprocating weight.
Obviously, the counterweights:
1. oppose the mass of rotating components (crankpin, rod big end)
2. position this opposing mass as closely as practical to the actual crank throws

Assuming that all component weights are matched between all cylinders (pistons, rods end-for-end and total, etc.), what determines the counterweight mass? 100% of the eccentric rotating mass + ???
Engine is the older Gen-2 Chevy "stovebolt" 235/261, 4 mains, 3.9375" stroke, 6.8125" rods.
 

RE: L6 crankshaft balance?

"in-line engines do not have balance weights"

Well you can remove that bookmark.

You are talking, I think, about counterweights, not primary balance. They are there primarily to counteract the inertia of each piston/conrod assembly.

There are several different ways of designing the counterweights for an engine, one of the most common historically was to attempt to reduce the maximum main bearing loads down to an acceptable number.

This relies on being able to work out the dynamic stiffness of the crank, which is in turn affected by the counterweights. So it wasn't an easy job before computers, and even now is a bit esoteric.

Incidentally the crank on a BMW I6 is primary balanced at every web, not just the front and rear.

If you run an engine at low speed it no longer needs counterweights, but it'll still need to be balanced. If you run an engine with inadequate counterweights at high speed it'll run for a while, but expect to run into durability problems.

Cheers

Greg Locock

I rarely exceed 1.79 x 10^12 furlongs per fortnight

RE: L6 crankshaft balance?

Maybe you're getting confused between primary and secondary balance?  Big I4 (>2L) engines often have secondary balancer shafts, whereas I6 engines don't need them.

- Steve

RE: L6 crankshaft balance?

Maybe it's been superceded, but the relevant textbook in my uni days was Martin's "Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines".  Reciprocating engine balancing explained. (Caveat: this textbook hands you a few sardines for an appetizer, but mainly teaches you to fish).

RE: L6 crankshaft balance?

kitabel,

An in-line 6 with proper indexing of the crank pins has no inertia force or couple unbalance.  So solely with regards to these vibratory effects, no crankshaft counterweights are required.

But as GregLocock notes, counterweights also serve to reduce peak main bearing inertia loads, reduce crank bending between mains, and also can be used to mitigate torsional vibration effects along the crankshaft structure.

The optimum use of counterweight masses in an in-line 6 crank is an exercise in compromise, just like any other crank design.  The trade off is between vibrations, weight, mass properties, shaft dynamics, bearing life, cost, fatigue life, etc.  A limited life, low inertia, lightweight racing crank made from high strength alloy steel would probably not benefit from counterweights.  On the other hand, a low cost, cast iron, production automotive crankshaft would greatly benefit from an optimized counterweight configuration.

At a very simplistic level that just considers inertias, the counterweight mass should balance 100% of the opposing crank pin and web structure plus approximately 50% of the reciprocating rod/piston mass.  That should provide a good starting point.  The counterweight should be designed to have a CG as far away from the crank axis as possible.  Maximizing the counterweight MOI will minimize the total counterweight mass needed.

A good, easy to read reference is "Fundamentals of Automotive Engine Balance" by W. Thomson. 1978.

Hope that helps.
Terry

RE: L6 crankshaft balance?

(OP)
100% of the opposing crank pin and web structure plus approximately 50% of the reciprocating rod/piston mass

But, since this is exactly the method for (completely different) 90° V8.....?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources