×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Fatigue Data - 50% Probability Query

Fatigue Data - 50% Probability Query

Fatigue Data - 50% Probability Query

(OP)
Dear Experts,
I have a general query regarding approaches to take when there is a lack of sufficient data for fatigue analysis.

Is it the case that most fatigue data corresponds to average stress-life or strain-life curves fitted to a set of test data which relates to 50% survival probability?

If components are to be designed to 90% survival probability, how does one incorporate safety factors to account for this low 50% survival rate?

Currently my company uses a double figure to scale up the target number of cycles to be met. I don't know where this figure comes from. Is there a more accurate approach to take in terms of assuming a reasonable safety factor far analysis?

Thanks

Ed
 

RE: Fatigue Data - 50% Probability Query

morris9791,

I can't answer your specific question, but you might want to take a look at how rolling element bearing fatigue lives are calculated statistically, and what impact various parameters might have on that life value.  A 10% failure rate in your statistical sample would equate to an L10 life, and a 50% failure rate would be an L50 life.

In general based on my (limited) experience with calculating bearing life, I would suggest that the FoS=2.0 that you are using to compensate for the difference between a 90% reliability vs. a 50% reliability is probably a little low.  As you get close to a 100% reliability, the fatigue life tends to get reduced very quickly.  As an example, the fatigue life of a bearing at >99% reliability is only about 1/20th that of a bearing fatigue life at 90% reliability.

As I'm sure you're aware, calculating fatigue life is a very complex process, involving many factors.  Without material fatigue data based on a statistically representative sample, your best bet is to be very conservative in your analysis.

Hope that helps.
Terry

RE: Fatigue Data - 50% Probability Query

(OP)
Terry and unclesyd,

Thanks for the useful post.
Terry, our FoS is not 2 but in the region between 10 and 15. Although I don't know where the figure came from, would this be conservative and in line with what you have stated? For we generally do not have sufficient fatigue data that is statistically representative and hence why we use this 'magical figure'!

Best Regards
Ed

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources