×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Apparently, not your typical TITLE BLOCK question...

Apparently, not your typical TITLE BLOCK question...

Apparently, not your typical TITLE BLOCK question...

(OP)
I did a search ten pages deep, but did not find a question/answer to what I'm looking for.

My company has been awarded an order for our industrial equipment where the customer wants all 2D drawings with their title block and border.  

This has caused some consternation in our Engineering department as it comes across with the customer's logo, name and all.  I failed to realize the concern and would appreciate comments/replies to my question: Which is the appropriate way to handle this:

(1) Refuse to use the customer title block altogether and use our standard
(2) Insert their title block outside our title block (?!)
(3) Use their title block.

Thanks,
TZ

RE: Apparently, not your typical TITLE BLOCK question...

"He who pays the piper picks the tune."

Use their title block.  If it's in the contract to use their block and the contract has been accepted then it's a bit late to worry about it now, someone should have addressed this before accepting the job.

If there are Intellectual Property rights issues that you're worried about handing over then get legal involved.  Maybe adding a note to all the drawings above and beyond their title block addressing this will suffice.  I've seen vaguely similar done after companies merged, simplistically all the older drawings were stamped with a note covering the fact the fact the new company owned the IP or something like that.

At a previous employer we occasionally did contract design jobs where we had to use the customers title block.  As I recall since they were paying for the development then they effectively owned the IP anyway so that wasn't an issue.

Only take option 1 if you're willing to lose the work, and future work.  Don't take option 2, that sounds like a mess.

Posting guidelines FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm? (probably not aimed specifically at you)
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?

RE: Apparently, not your typical TITLE BLOCK question...

If it's written in the contract signed by both parties, do as the contract states.

Chris
SolidWorks 09 SP4.1
ctopher's home
SolidWorks Legion

RE: Apparently, not your typical TITLE BLOCK question...

Does your company and your customer have CAGE Codes?  If not, you can still do the following but it gets messier.

The title block will most likely contain their CAGE Code.  But, you can create a note just above the title block, although I think the spec also states in the Revision History block, that the DESIGN AUTHORITY is your CAGE Code.

Or you could just make a note stating that the original design authority was your company and then you transferred the authority to your customer upon project completion.

--Scott
http://wertel.eng.pro

RE: Apparently, not your typical TITLE BLOCK question...

Option 2 is standard industry practice.  But if the customer insists on just their title block then do what they want or don't do the job.  Just beware of any "gotchas" in their title block that could come back to haunt you.

RE: Apparently, not your typical TITLE BLOCK question...

We do as your customer and require any drawings to be on our format.  This has not presented any big problems, as contractually we own the resulting data.  In addition to requiring our format be used, we also require that the actual CAD files be a deliverable.
The biggest problem with this policy is having some really, relly bad drawings on our format.  I DO NOT want to have to train every vendor in proper drafting, so we live with it, unless it is severe enough to cause manufacturing issues in the future should we decide to have another vendor fabricate the design.

"Good to know you got shoes to wear when you find the floor." - Robert Hunter
 

RE: Apparently, not your typical TITLE BLOCK question...

(OP)
Thak for the input and I appreciate the contractual side of it.  For future reference and perhaps more philosophical in nature, how do you treat this request in the future?  

I failed to appreciate the intellectual property considerations initially and therefore would like to understand what is generally acceptable for the next time...

Thanks,
TZ

RE: Apparently, not your typical TITLE BLOCK question...

My company uses option 2, and it is messy.

RE: Apparently, not your typical TITLE BLOCK question...

Is the product you are selling already designed? ("awarded an order for our industrial equipment")

Yet they want drawings with their titleblock?

Sounds like the IP is your company's.
They may be reselling your company's products and their customer wants to see the drawings.

I would do option 2.
Hopefully your design is not on E-size paper.
I would take my company drawings and create their titleblock on the next larger sheet and put our sheet right on top of theirs. I have done this when I did airbag designs for the auto industry. I just created a 2-D dumb drawing sheet and imported it into the larger titelblock file. This preserves your CAD design and drawing and only gives them the 2-d data, even if you send them 'their' file.
 

"Wildfires are dangerous, hard to control, and economically catastrophic."

Ben Loosli

RE: Apparently, not your typical TITLE BLOCK question...

In our situation, the contracts are for tooling designs and associative databases.  Any IP is contractually ours.  If a vendor did what Ben suggests with us and sent us cartoon drawings and models of little value, they would not be a qualified vendor for very long and may not be paid since the agreed upon deliverables had not been met.  We are paying them to develop this IP and consider it ours, and they know this going into the project.  If they want to keep the IP rights, they will have to find other customers.  

"Good to know you got shoes to wear when you find the floor." - Robert Hunter
 

RE: Apparently, not your typical TITLE BLOCK question...

If using their title block effectively gives them the IP, does it also make them responsible if there are any problems with the design?

RE: Apparently, not your typical TITLE BLOCK question...

In other words, write a good PO.  Any comments of "regardless to customer requirements" in their replies need to be addressed prior to issuing the PO.

Matt Lorono
Lorono's SolidWorks Resources & SolidWorks Legion

&

RE: Apparently, not your typical TITLE BLOCK question...

We had a similar occurence which we got through our system by using their titleblock  and part numbers with their own sign off area and seperate area for our sign off. Our sign off region said "Designed by Our Company" and was just added on the left side of our customers main titleblock region. Not sure if this correct but that got us through a similar situation. See attachment

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources