×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Equivalent to Replace Reference Set (NX6.0)

Equivalent to Replace Reference Set (NX6.0)

Equivalent to Replace Reference Set (NX6.0)

(OP)
Is there any equivalent in SE of the '' REPLACE REFERENCE SET'' function in NX 6.0.

Im trying to start from a parasolid assemblie and to create parametric part from it. The probleme is that i cannot '' unlink'' the protrusion that i want to create from the original parasolid parts.

I hope I was clear ans sorry if my english is not flawless but I was unfortunately born as a French Canadian :P just kidding.

David

thank you

RE: Equivalent to Replace Reference Set (NX6.0)

Salut David!

Are you working with Solid Edge Synchronous Technology or with the traditionnal environment.

If you are importing a parasolid I would suggest Synchronous.

I don't know NX so I'm guessing here...

In Synchronous you can "detach" a group of faces from the model.

Si tu as besoin d'aide n'hésite pas à le demander.

Patrick

RE: Equivalent to Replace Reference Set (NX6.0)

Salut les gars,

How about creating the french-canadian connection, a sub-group of Eng-Tips Solid Edge Forum! blllttt

Just to be clear, David, did you create your part "in place" into the context of the assembly? I don't have access to SE right now, but if I remember correctly, by right-clicking on the linked part in the pathfinder, you have the option to break the link, if that is what you are looking for. I don't know NX either...

RE: Equivalent to Replace Reference Set (NX6.0)

(OP)
Haha Ben j'ai essayer de créer la part en place mais je ne suis pas capable de la ''calquer'' si je peux m'exprimer ainsi.
Le problème c'est que c'est du tubing que j'essai de reconstruire de façon plus standard et quand j'essai de créer la '' part in place '' je n'ai aucune référence ( plan ) ou quoi que ce soit pour me fixer.

Je sais pas si ca répond un peu a vos questions c'est difficile d'être claire.

Merci beaucoup

  

RE: Equivalent to Replace Reference Set (NX6.0)

(OP)
Vérification faite je n'ai pas la fonction Break Link mais j,ai eu des problèmes a cause que je n'ai pas une liscence complète si tu pourrais me confirmer que cette fonction existe belle et bien ca serais merveilleux.

I've done my homework and I don't hate the Break link Fonction but I already had trouble beacause I dont have a Full license. It would be fabulous if you can confirm that such a fonction really do exist.

RE: Equivalent to Replace Reference Set (NX6.0)

Je vais répondre en anglais pour que les autres usager puisse suivre la conversation et apporter leur soutien...

I don't think the break link fonction can be disabled by the license you have.

I would rather check if you are in the right context to break the link.

But if you start from the beginning. From my point of view you are trying to build kind of a frame based on a parasolid assembly is that right? Can you confirm if you are using Synchronous or Traditionnal to do so? I think with synchronous you could modify directly the part you imported from parasolid. On the other end if you want to do this with traditionnal then it's a different workflow.

Patrick

RE: Equivalent to Replace Reference Set (NX6.0)

Quote (billylecaid):

quand j'essai de créer la '' part in place '' je n'ai aucune référence ( plan ) ou quoi que ce soit pour me fixer.
(I'm also responding in english so other users can give their input)

Do you mean that you're unable to use any existing plane, face or edge in your assembly?

After clicking on the Create In-Place button in the Parts library, I usually just select "Coincident with assembly origin" in the pop-up window, because it's less of a hassle (or maybe I'm just lazy). blllttt
 

RE: Equivalent to Replace Reference Set (NX6.0)

Could you explain what Replace Reference Set does in NX so that we have an idea of what you are trying to achieve.

bc.
2.4GHz Core2 Quad, 4GB RAM,
Quadro FX4600.

Where would we be without sat-nav?

RE: Equivalent to Replace Reference Set (NX6.0)

(OP)
Pat Couture :

I'm using traditional setting.

I'm trying to make an exact copy of the parasolid in order to have the feature tree ( arborescence ) and to be able to modify my part in a near future. So I start with a parasolid made out of multiple dead solid and in the end I want to recreate every single part with their respective feature in order to modify them later on.

Furthermore it is a direct request from the client.

Gemnoc:

Thank I didn't notice that I will try this out

beachcomber:

In UGS NX I can as an exemple open part which is a dead body ( parasolid ) and with the sketch tool copy the shape of the parasolid and the extrude it. So basically I hate the same shape which are overlapping.

Then I can, with the replace reference set tool, decide select wich feature I want to appear in the assembly. So i can choose to have just the feature that i create from the sketch and no the parasolid.

The idea behind all that is to recreate all the part in the exact same place so i don't havre to mate my different part wich are in this case bent tubing wich is a pain in the ass to mate.



---------------------------------

I hope I've been clear and I cannot thank you guy enought to take time to try to help me, i really appreciate it.




 

RE: Equivalent to Replace Reference Set (NX6.0)

From what I'm reading, to accomplish this I would probably create a new part and then insert the parasolid part with the part copy feature to have it as a construction surface. Then I would be able to recreate the part from scratch but still be able to model it right over the part copy. Then you can easily hide the part copy. Also since the part copy will be only construction surface you will not see them in the assembly.

I hope that make sense.

Patrick

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources