Removal Limits Below Column Footings
Removal Limits Below Column Footings
(OP)
Background: Using Schmertmann's method I estimated settlement below a proposed column footing and recommended removals below the footing to reduce maximum settlement to less than one inch. I recommended that removals extend beyond the footing a distance equal to the removal depth. This is based on the assumption that the stress from the footing load spreads out along lines with a 1:1 slope.
Problem: Utilities and easements will limit the horizontal extent of removals for the column footings (on one side) so that the removals will only extend beyond the footing a distance equal to half of the removal depth (or less).
Question: How will the estimated settlement be affected and can it be reasonably evaluated? Will this affect the behavior of the footing? Are my assumptions too conservative (although common practice here)?
Your thoughts are greatly appreciated.
Problem: Utilities and easements will limit the horizontal extent of removals for the column footings (on one side) so that the removals will only extend beyond the footing a distance equal to half of the removal depth (or less).
Question: How will the estimated settlement be affected and can it be reasonably evaluated? Will this affect the behavior of the footing? Are my assumptions too conservative (although common practice here)?
Your thoughts are greatly appreciated.





RE: Removal Limits Below Column Footings
I understand that you used Schmertman's method, but have you looked at just solving this problem using Bousinesq's stress distributions? You may find it interesting to look at the actual stress distribution below the center, edge and corner of your footing. You'll see widely varying stress distributions. The actual settlement, however will be some "average" of the soils response to these stress increases. If you are dealing with compression (assumed as you said you're using Schmertman's method), then you can assign the modulus values to the various layers and then look a the stress increase in each layer (or sublayer) and integrate the stress increase with respect to depth (i.e., calculate the "area" of the stress bulb). Divide the "area" by the soil modulus (using consistent units) and voilla, you'll have the anticipated settlement.
There is no part of this determination that depends on overexcavation.
I haven't been sued yet (i.e., my foundation designs hold up). How did you get at soil modulus? That's the issue. . .
f-d
¡papá gordo ain't no madre flaca!
RE: Removal Limits Below Column Footings
I try to clean off the nearby structure and then assume that the friction between the compacted material and that structure makes up for what you can't replace.
And I also have not been sued on this subject.
RE: Removal Limits Below Column Footings
RE: Removal Limits Below Column Footings
Note that column footings are integrated into the continuous perimeter footings and will behave as strip footing with non-uniform load.
f-d, soil modulus was estimated based on soil type and SPT blow count data.
RE: Removal Limits Below Column Footings
https://w
RE: Removal Limits Below Column Footings
RE: Removal Limits Below Column Footings
f-d
¡papá gordo ain't no madre flaca!
RE: Removal Limits Below Column Footings
1:1 is more conservative in evaluating lateral extent of influence, but less conservative if that spread is used to calculate stress increase.
RE: Removal Limits Below Column Footings