×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Ground Grid Study

Ground Grid Study

Ground Grid Study

(OP)
If the customer didn't have specific instructions on whether the cacluation be done for a 70 KG or 50 KG person.
Which one is recommended to choose?
Is there a difference of paractice for NEC or CSA point of view?

RE: Ground Grid Study

It would be more conservative to choose 50kg body weight since they can tolerate less current.

Your best bet is to follow IEEE-80-2000 if this is for a substation application.  I assume you are in Canada?

RE: Ground Grid Study

(OP)
Yes , I am in Canada.
Cost difference between 70 and 50 is another criteria that needs to be considered.
if 70 KG is considered, less copper and Rods will be used.
 

RE: Ground Grid Study

Yes, it is true that you can get away with less copper if you use 70 kg as your design criteria. However, depending on your conditions, you could have unsafe conditions for persons weighing less than 70kg.

You would be best served to take the conservative route for the sake of safety than to take the less conservative route for cost.

Have you run any studies yet?  Did you have to add a significant amount of buried copper to meet 50kg criteria?

What software are you using?  What is the application of this grid?

RE: Ground Grid Study

(OP)
Ground grid is for substation. I am thinking if possible to use 70 KG for inside the sub and 50 KG for around the fence.
We use CYMGRD.

RE: Ground Grid Study

If your software will allow it, that could be a practical solution.  You might want to recommend that signage be placed around the substation not permitting persons less than 70kg to enter the sub yard as there is a risk of a potentially lethal step/touch voltage.

RE: Ground Grid Study

(OP)
signage is a good idea but what about the substation fence?
If the calculation is done for 70 KG, the touch potential will be higher for a 50 KG person when touching the fence.

RE: Ground Grid Study

Do you have a company policy that prevents people weighing less then 70 kg from entering the substation?

If not, I see no justification for using 70 kg inside the substation and 50 kg outside.
 

RE: Ground Grid Study

(OP)
jghrist,
makes sense.Thank you.
 

RE: Ground Grid Study

Have you choosed prpoper shock time ? this can affect the amount of copper cosiderably. How about unsymmetrical grid design, have you tried it?Isolating fence may help your copper saving depending sub. area.

RE: Ground Grid Study

Isolating the fence is not a good idea if you have overhead lines that cross over the fence.  A line to ground fence on an ungrounded fence would surely kill a person.

I agree with the statement of shock time affecting your results.  You have to choose one that is realistic, yet conservative enough.  We typically use 250 milliseconds.

RE: Ground Grid Study

(OP)
The shock time is set by the software at .5 second. I always use this!!!
 I beleive this depends on the total clearing time of upstream breaker.

WindTurbines..
Can I ask, based on what assupmtion you use 250ms?

RE: Ground Grid Study

Quote:

The shock time is set by the software at .5 second. I always use this!!!
 I beleive this depends on the total clearing time of upstream breaker.

WindTurbines..
Can I ask, based on what assupmtion you use 250ms?
The shock time should equal the fault duration which depends on relay and breaker interrupting time.  There are many nuances with breaker failure, reclosing, etc.  I suggest you read the relevant section in IEEE Std 80 that discussed these nuances.  0.5 seconds is a lot of time for a high fault current.  On what basis do you use 0.5 seconds?  Surely the software will allow changing this.

RE: Ground Grid Study

The software we use actually is preset to 250 milliseconds.  We also compared this with the clearing time of our upstream protection and found that 250 ms is actually slightly on the conservative side anyway.  We recently did a study using 500 ms when the client specifically asked us to.  The results were dramatically different.

RE: Ground Grid Study

(OP)
CYMGRD default is 0.5 seconds, If there is a reclosure action then the results would be different and clearing time needs to be higher.

RE: Ground Grid Study

True, which is why the clearing time shouldn't be chosen at random.  This is one of those little inputs that has a huge effect on the outcome.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources