Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
(OP)
Hello guys, I am new to this forum and I am currently working on my engineering degree.. I work as a designer now for a palletizing company.. i have a very unique application that i would like to share with some others and get their thoughts
A company that is very close to our facility is buying a chain conveyor that is running thru a heater.. They produce chemicals.. and they send barrals of them into the heater to liquify them.. They currently run gravity conveyor thru it and they a stick to push and pull them thru.. They would like a powered application and due to our limited space, cant use live driven roller.. We offered using chain conveyor for the application.. Heres what i am doing
Using double 100 pitch chain.. 2 driven chains.. barrals 550 lbs each.. up to 9 on it at a time.. They would like to run the conveyor in forward and reverse.. so a center driven application is required.. Conveyors are about 12' long.. temp gets up to 200 degrees F.. I am able to drive the conveyor outside of the heater on the tail end of the normal running direction.. my solution is to use 2 custom chain tensioners with 2 different springs.. one taking up about 200 lb of load (tsubaki recommends only using 150 lb max of tension on the chain without prematurely stretching it.. they claimed we could use a little more, due to high safty factors.. im not sure where they get this when i calculate the working load to be 5000lb per chain) and the 2nd spring take up about 500 lb of load.. (due to the coefficent of friction on the 550 lb pails, my max load is 1980 lb(550*9*.4), so about 1000 lb on each chain) since i am pulling down on the tightener 90 degrees, i figure the tightener will take half and the mount for the tightener will take half
i would wrap the chain 90 degrees on each idler sprocket that is attached to the tensioner.. below it a 180 degree wrap on the drive.. the tensioners will push in toward each other over the driven section.. I invision when the chain is ran forward the leading tensioner will compress its 200lb load, and as its pulling the larger load, compress into the 500lb spring (if chain has expanded, spring will take up the difference).. on the tail end, it will work in reverse, as the chain will become loose it will pull it tight against the drive.. so no matter what direction i run, or how much the chain expands.. it will stay tight on the drive.. what would your guys opinion on this application be?
I appreciate anyone who is interested in reading my issue.. just want to get another oppinion on my situation.. i plan on getting involved in these forums to help me learn more about fellow engineers applications
thanks again!
A company that is very close to our facility is buying a chain conveyor that is running thru a heater.. They produce chemicals.. and they send barrals of them into the heater to liquify them.. They currently run gravity conveyor thru it and they a stick to push and pull them thru.. They would like a powered application and due to our limited space, cant use live driven roller.. We offered using chain conveyor for the application.. Heres what i am doing
Using double 100 pitch chain.. 2 driven chains.. barrals 550 lbs each.. up to 9 on it at a time.. They would like to run the conveyor in forward and reverse.. so a center driven application is required.. Conveyors are about 12' long.. temp gets up to 200 degrees F.. I am able to drive the conveyor outside of the heater on the tail end of the normal running direction.. my solution is to use 2 custom chain tensioners with 2 different springs.. one taking up about 200 lb of load (tsubaki recommends only using 150 lb max of tension on the chain without prematurely stretching it.. they claimed we could use a little more, due to high safty factors.. im not sure where they get this when i calculate the working load to be 5000lb per chain) and the 2nd spring take up about 500 lb of load.. (due to the coefficent of friction on the 550 lb pails, my max load is 1980 lb(550*9*.4), so about 1000 lb on each chain) since i am pulling down on the tightener 90 degrees, i figure the tightener will take half and the mount for the tightener will take half
i would wrap the chain 90 degrees on each idler sprocket that is attached to the tensioner.. below it a 180 degree wrap on the drive.. the tensioners will push in toward each other over the driven section.. I invision when the chain is ran forward the leading tensioner will compress its 200lb load, and as its pulling the larger load, compress into the 500lb spring (if chain has expanded, spring will take up the difference).. on the tail end, it will work in reverse, as the chain will become loose it will pull it tight against the drive.. so no matter what direction i run, or how much the chain expands.. it will stay tight on the drive.. what would your guys opinion on this application be?
I appreciate anyone who is interested in reading my issue.. just want to get another oppinion on my situation.. i plan on getting involved in these forums to help me learn more about fellow engineers applications
thanks again!





RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
The take-up needs to be sized to tension the chain with load on it plus what would be the return strand of chain on a more traditional conveyor arrangement. So take-up forces and chain forces are higher but the system is not complicated.
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
Are you saying that my chain might not be strong enough?
Standard 100 pitch chain tensile strength is 24000 lb's double would be 48000 lb's per strand.. I am calcualting the working load of 5333.33 lb's (48000*1/9).. If im putting 1100 lbs max on each chain wouldnt the chain that i selected be adequate? Is there something i am missing? I will be ramping on a motor starter from 0 to 46 fpm.. i calculate the additional load to do that by.. (m/g)a = (4950/32.14)(46fpm/60s) = 118.08 lbs.. with the overall sum of things that still gives me a sf of 5.. please help me if i have this incorrect
I like the idea i wasnt thinking of it in that way and its definitly something to think about.. I wont be at work til tomorrow and when i do i will determine how much room i have to the floor to possibly do something like that.. it deffinitly simplifys the system for sure
thanks for the post! let me know if i got my numbers straight
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
Your tension will be probably be higher than the weight of the gearmotor. You will need a separate tensioning device, which, in my world, would be a pair of air cylinders interconnected through spur gears, an equalizer shaft and gear racks. I am not going to do any calculations for you, so I can't say whether your chain is overloaded and I can't say what the take-up forces will be. But you can figure it out, you appear conscientious and enthusiastic. Check out the publications that CEMA has to offer if you are unsure about conveyor design.
Don't forget to allow for chain stretch, wear and thermal growth when deciding how much stroke you need on the take-up cylinders. A word of caution, if you use springs and the chains grow due to thermal expansion, you won't have the tensioning that you thought you might.
Don't get too far into the design without checking with some of the more experienced people that you work with. This may include mechanics and craftsmen.
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
Other systems that I've seen have tensioning built into the freewheeling sprocket assembly, while the other end sprocket is either directly driven or belt-driven.
TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
thanks for the thought of the pizza oven design but i think with that application and it moving so slow and driving in one direction.. u can sag the chain/belt to allow it stretch and use the weight of the chain to hold tension on its drive
I dont have anyone to go to at work actually, its a small company and ironicly.. no one this company has an engineering degree.. me being the only one going for it.. but as you said, i am enthusiastic about this and im excited about joining here and keeping up with other peoples designs and opening my thoughts.
thanks again guys! its been very helpful
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
Old saying-keep it simple.
I feel you are way over-designing this application.
You have already worked out the required chain pull of about 2000 lbs (1000 per chain) so why use 24000 lb chain when 6000/7500 lb would suffice or even just 1" pitch transmission chain.
Using such large chain just adds to the bulk of the thing with bigger sprockets/bearings/ shafts etc when it is not necessary.
As you say the conveyors are 12'long I would not even worry about auto take up designs-just use basic mechanical takeup at either the drive position or on one of the end shafts.
The ammount of thermal expansion is miniscule and not worth the worry or cost to implement an auto take up system-just normal design to accomodate wear/ stretch is all that is required.
Just remember on the idler shaft positions to only key one sprocket per shaft and allow the other to float between collars or some other means to contain the side ways movement.
Good luck
Ross
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
I don't see the need to have the third shaft for the drive.
Just drive the fixed shaft and use a spring tension tail. It'll be fine.
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
Ross, it is a project i got involved with in the middle of the game.. the guy who started this project suggested 100 pitch double (1 1/4") for the application.. which is obviously over kill as i stated with the SF.. the customer expects it and is part of what is sold.. unfortunitly even if i wanted to go back its a tough one to sell "why" to the customer at this point
The tsubaki engineer (again, my fellow co worker talked with him about it) said the chain stretch over that distance and that temp change could but as much as a 1/2".. Now it appears many of you are suggesting that isnt enough to disrupt the system.. i suppose you could look at it since the pitch is 1 1/4" thats not even half of the pitch of one link.. This being said, you guys could be right about me over engineering this design
Note: This got me wondering how the tsubaki guy got his numbers.. i researched about thermal expansion in chain but couldnt find anything.. however the expainsion of steel in meters per C is 0.000016.. with a delta C of 72 degrees if i were to have a solid plate 24' (7.31m) long (12' top, 12' return chain) then the expansion of that plate would be (72 C)(0.000016 m/m C)(7.31m) = 0.0084m which is .03315" a 1/32" of differance.. With that calculation there it appears that either tsubaki has a different formula from the construction or i dont got my numbers right.. in reality, with me doing the calc on a solid plate rather then a bunch of small links.. it would actually be LESS then what i just calculated
Also, picking up on what you guys have said too, these chains can handle brutal temps, up to 400 C at times.. and im running it at around 200 F or 93 C which is nothing compared to its max
I do appreciate everyones comments as i continue to work on this project.. Not only is it helping me learn but it is helping me keep my thoguhts "simple" and sometimes as we all do, we get to complicated and think to far outside the box.. and clearly i think that is what i have done..
Does anyone know how i can prove that calcuation i did? I have looked for ANSI Roller chain expansion numbers and came up empty
thanks again guys!
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
I very much doubt the Tsubaki guy bothered to do any calculations. His number is probably at best a swag and more likely a wag.
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
My reference is 0.013 mm / m per deg C for steel.
With delta C = 72 and length of 8 m then the elongation is 7.5 mm (a bit more than 1/4") or 3.75 mm change in tension shaft position. So I don't think I'd bother with automatic tensioning.
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
Thanks Peter.. I think this is very close to beable to be solved on my end.. and i appreciate everyones efforts in helping me
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
1. Don't forget that this is a reversing conveyor application. The tight side on loading is the slack side on unloading.
2. Tension in the chain isn't everything. You may have someone slamming barrels down on top of the chain links. I don't think that RC100 chain is overbuilt for this application.
3. Is this double strand 100-2 ht
or double-pitch 2100 chain
ht
4. Nine 55 gallon drums at 22.5 inch diameter equals 16'-10.5"
5. Even if the sprockets are very closely timed one side will momentarily bear all of the load.
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
Yes you are right, this weekend i was thinking the conveyors were somewhere around 12' that is the amount inside the heater.. they can put 6 in at a time.. and station 3 outside.. very good observation
It is 100-2 sorry for the discrepency
With my intial thoughts that is how i anticipated the tighetners to function.. leading side bears it, tail end of the drive takes up the slack.. It doesnt sound like the stratch will be much as we found out.. my coworker moved forward with our initial designs over the weekend and i shared some of the things we discussed here.. i will also bring up the thermal expansion calc tomorrow to him and discuss our thoughts.. we are just about done just putting finishing touches, i suppose at the minimum the tensioners will allow us to be sure the system runs smooth.. the big problem with this at work is they want 7 of these conveyors.. so everything that is done is times 7.. if we have any issues the costs will skyrocket quickly.. in addition, if we could save the tensioners,.. the savings would skyrocket as well
Also, we are using and N6 with needle bearings in the idler spockets.. we are not using a keyed shaft for any of the sprockets but the drive.. everything else is independant
thanks again
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
http://www.meshbelt.com/Chainweave.html
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
We braze at about 1500 F, use flights and just run the dive train belt down a track with a pulley on each end.
I have seen food service operations do something similar with carts.
Thomas J. Walz
Carbide Processors, Inc.
www.carbideprocessors.com
Good engineering starts with a Grainger Catalog.
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
Your specifics are exactly the reason for my previous post as these type belts don't normally require a tensioning device and tension may actually create problems.
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
typically you wouldnt have to put tension on chain but because im moving in forward and in reverse.. it needs to be tight enough to pull the chain from both direction
Actually your application of 1500 F is a good example that is beyond typical temps.. i did some looking that 400C (750 F) is getting to the line of standard ANSI roller chain.. Sounds like you are using something like uncle recommended, that chain reminds me of that mesh kind of chain we use
http://www.beltpower.com/FlatWire.htm
it appears they make that roller chain belt stuff as well
that stuff isnt cheap.. we pay 2 grand or so for a 10 foot conveyor
RE: Chain conveyor thru a heater.. Holding tension
I got a quote from Audubon (www.meshbelt.com).
They are fast. Sent the info in last night and the quote was waiting for me this morning.
This is what I sent them:
Overall Belt width – 6" flights
Belt length 25 feet
Distance from drive axle to idler axle is 11 feet.
Hot zone is 45" long
The parts go from ambient to app. 1500F if 45" which takes about 4 to 4 ½ minutes
The belt moves about one foot in one minute to 70 seconds. (Speed is variable)
The drive is on the charge end
The drive is hardened steel chain.
The chin is supported on skids the entire length.
The drive pulley and tail pulley are 10" in diameter and toothed.
The maximum load per square foot is well under one pound.
The product being conveyed is saw tips. The minimum size is 0.250" x 0.100".
The maximum temperature is 2200F
Normal operating temperature is about 1900F
The belt is horizontal.
We need to replace the flights every year or two depending on use. After several replacements the holes in the drive chain are now oversize allowing some shifting of the flights.
I would like flights that will hold up better.
This is their quote.
Item: 6" Wide X 25' Long
Type: Balance Weave
Wire: .063" Dia
Edge: Welded
Metal: 3519 Cb
Spec: B-48-47-14
Price: 25 Linear Feet @ $45.40/Lf $1,135.00
Price looks o.k. I pay about $500 for a set of new flights plus the cost of attaching them the chain.
Not sure about switching from flights to mesh belt with parts as small as 0.100 x 0.250 when the parts have to be kept level.
Tom
Thomas J. Walz
Carbide Processors, Inc.
www.carbideprocessors.com
Good engineering starts with a Grainger Catalog.