×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

16 hour SE Exam

16 hour SE Exam

16 hour SE Exam

(OP)
I just saw on the NCEES website that in April 2011, all states are going to administer the 16 hour exam instead of SE1 and SE2.

Now, I've failed the SE1 three times. I'm a horrible test taker and won't go for the General PE with Structural because I've only worked buildings in the last 4 years. Previous to that I did work in bridges. I still dabble in bridges, but I'm mostly buildings now.

Anyway, so what is everyone's thoughts on this? I saw the breakdown, and it doesn't see so scary. I'd MUCH prefer the essay type questions to multiple choice. I'm thinking about just opting to wait on retaking an exam until then.  

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

I wouldn't recommend waiting for the 16-hr exam in your case.  It's basically going to combine the current SE1 and SE2 (which is significantly harder).  Why would a test that covers twice the material be easier?  Plus, it's going to be a brand new exam, so who knows what it will be like.  I wouldn't want to be the guinea pig taking the first round of a new exam with a brand new format.

If you're struggling with the SE1, try the Civil PE with the Structural option.  I've known engineers that have failed SE1 a couple times, then bounced back and passed the Civil PE on the first shot.

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

I have taken and passed the Civil PE, SEI and the SEII exams...I have done building design for about 10 years now and I thought the civil PE exam was very easy. I would recommend taking the Civil PE exam to get your license and then if you so choose take the 16 hr. SE exam in 2011. I plan on taking the 16 hr. SE exam..but that is because I am a glutton for punishment. :)

neffers

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

Neffers,

What would happen to your current licenses if you take the new PE test and fail?  Would you loose your license in states you are currently registered?
 

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

(OP)
Well, honestly, I shouldn't count the first time I took it. It was HEAVY in Precast. That being said, I am NOT familiar with the LRFD AASHTO at all. I have never done an LRFD bridge. I am so much more comfortable with buildings. I don't think the test would be easier, per sey. I just think it would be nicer to get it all done in one shot. I don't want to take the General PE and then have to turn around and STILL take the 16 hour test. To get an SE license I still have to go through it. So, why bother now getting a PE then still having to suffer? I'd just rather go through it once. Well, one test instead of multiple ones. Plus, I really like the essay problems that gives me partial credit instead of multiple choice that is right or wrong.

I am a HORRIBLE test taker. Plain and simple. I've cried over this, I'm a girl, I can do that, and I'm just worn down. I've seen multiple people fail the General PE. I thought about it, but I just don't think that's the right answer for me.  

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

We don't do any bridge work at all.  I've never even looked at AASHTO, but I feel comfortable enough with building structures to expect to pass.  

We haven't had anyone fail to pass the exam on the first shot in a VERY long time.  I don't attribute that to us having exceptionally smart people as much as I do the varied work that we do.

I'm at a point where I need to decide if I'm taking it in October (SEI) or waiting for the new exam in April, '11.  I'd like to get licensed asap, but my work only pays for the exam the first time you take it.  If I have to take the new exam at some point (which I'm sure I will), I'll have to pay for it out-of-pocket (if I take the SEI in October).

I'll expect the new exam to be more difficult than the SEI.

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

I have taken and passed the PE exam with the emphasis in structural. In my state I am able to practice structural engineering under this license and earned me the title of PE. I can honestly say that the test really was not a challenge but I did put in my time studying.  This will be your easiest way to get a license. (In my opinion) however, your stat may require you to obtain an SE license to practice structural engineering and the PE would have little value to you.   

I still wanted to push myself and take the S1 and S2 exams to obtain a SE designation. My plan was to take the S1 this coming April and pending passing the S1 I would take the S2 in October. However, NCEES pointed out to me that if I did pass the S1 in April 2010 and failed the S2 in October 2010 I would need to start over and retake the S1 under the new exam format. Both exams need to be taken and passed under the same exam format. After reading about how horrible of an experience it is to take the S1 and S2 I decided it wasn't worth it so I am waiting to take it under the new format. If I passed the S1 and failed the S2 I wouldn't have the will power to retake the S1 again.  

As far as comparing the two formats, I feel the new format will fit me better. Both formats are 16 hours both formats have multiple choice and essay and under both formats you can take each S1 and S2 independently.  It looks like they just broke it out into depth and breadth for S1 (gravity) and breadth and depth S2( lateral).

I just want to know if I can get a cut of the profits from selling all new exam reference books.
 

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

i have a friend who failed PE exam twice.. he took his 3rd exam a few months ago.. what's funny is he forgot his CALCULATOR!! i dont know if the results has been released already but i expect him to fail the 3rd try..

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

SteelPE

I don't believe so...but I guess it wouldn't hurt to check on that.

neffers

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

dakota9 makes a good point.  If you have not already passed the SEII (not sure from you post), just wait until 2011 and take the new 16 hour exam.
If you've passed the SEII, from what I've read, you have only two chances left to get the SEI to qualify for an SE license.  Even though I believe the SEI will still be around in 2011 (the SEII will go away), I think after 2011 the states will require the new 16 hour exam for an SE.

If you are only taking the SEI for a PE licnese, keep in mind some states don't take the SEI for a PE, Illinois for example.  What is not clear to me is if you pass the first session of the new 16 hour exam, will your state accept that as the SEI for a PE license?

I'm confused now, good luck.



IC

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

Unless you're in one of the 4 (?) states where an SE license is required to practice, the PE is so much more important to your career.  We have 3 SE's in the office that almost never use the designation, it amounts to a feather in the cap.

Momma, the 16-hr exam will still have multiple choice.  It's half and half between mult choice and essay.  Also if you're worried about bridges, the Civil Structural PE exam is general in the morning, and then in the afternoon you need to choose buildings OR bridges.  I'm in the opposite situation from you, I become first eligible to take the exam in Oct. 2010 and I'm going to make sure I pass the first time so that I don't have to take the 16 hr exam, until the point where it may be practical to get an SE.

SEIT, I don't do any bridges either, but I recommend at a minimum learning your way around AASHTO before the exam.  The SE1 is supposed to be approx 20% bridges, so if you get 0 on that it's going to be tough to pass.

 

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

Steellion,

Unless they are changing the format of the civil pe exam you don't choose buildings or bridges in the afternoon. The SE II exam you have to choose buildings or bridges but the afternoon civil pe is 40 questions, some of which may be bridge questions. I just took the civil PE exam in October and that is how it was then. I have not read anything regarding any upcoming changes...but I may be wrong.

neffers

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

Neffers, that must have been what I was thinking of.  I've been looking at it a lot lately and some things are blurring together.  Thanks for the correction.

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

(OP)
Ok, I am in Missouri, but live in IL. We DO IL work so in the end I DO need an SE license. That being said, ya'll made up my mind. I wasn't planning on taking the test again until October 2010. That would mean I would still have to turn around and take the new exam. So, I might as well wait.

Oh,and I know it still has multiple choice questions. My point was that it wasn't the ENTIRE exam. And yes, it does say on the NCEES website that for each afternoon you choose Bridges or Buildings for your essay type questions.

I know AASHTO, I am just not familiar with LRFD bridge design. I can handle the regular AASHTO manual. Throw in the LRFD loadings and factors, you just lost me. :o/

My problem is that I panic. I know that. I just wish there were more review courses for just STRUCTURAL only.  

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

Forgive me, I have been retired for a while now. Is SE different from PE, I noticed some people, particularly some of the AISC people, carrying both designations.

I ask because Structural Engineers used to take the civil exam except that the year I took the PE, they offered it in structural, a great relief to me because I was already a structural steel specialist.

I did look at the NCEES site but couldn't find an explanation.

Michael.
Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

The SE designation is a step beyond the PE.  It is a separate license.  It's heavily weighted on seismic design so it's required for mid-rise and high-rise design in earthquake prone states (Cali, Washington, Illinois, Hawaii(?) )

Pass Civil PE = PE
Pass Structural I = PE
Pass Struct I + Struct II + State-specific requirements = SE

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

Paddington -
NCEES has had multiple tests which have been adopted by states which cover the practice of structural engineering.  Currently the SE1 counts to the PE (mine is in MO too) and that is all.  The SE1 is just an alternative the general civil or other PE exams.
Some states have a practice act which requires passing the SE2 exam.  There are 5 or 6 of these states as I understand it.
Then there is CA + WA which require an SE3.  Those are unique.
What the NCEES is attempting to do is have one 16 hour exam which would work for all jurisdictions.  Problem is states currently which have only a PE do not except the new 16 hour exam for reciprocity.  So in order to be in responsible charge of a project in IL, NV or CA I would need to pass the new 16 hour exam.  In order to practice in MO, KS, etc I would need to take a separate 8 hr exam.
Thankfully I already have my PE + SE.

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

only few states has actual SE designation california being one.. in california you need to be PE first and have 3 years exp after being PE to qualify for the SE exam which is str1 + str2 + seismic exam

note that not because you have PE say in texas and more than 3 yrs post PE exp you qualify for SE california exam.. coz technically you are not a PE in california until you passed the seismic and surveying PE exam of california..

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

douganholz,
I don't think it is correct that there are states (with PE only) that wouldn't accept the SE 3.  I think they would...it is just that there are some states that have stated that they won't procter the SE 3 exam (like Kansas for example).  So if I've passed the SE-3, I should be able to get licensed in most all states (except perhaps California for the SE...time will tell).

Here's how I understand the lay of the land right now:

If you pass the PE exam:
   Most states accept you as a PE and you can practice structural engineering.
   Some states allow you to practice structural engineering but limit you to certain types of buildings (ex. - Calif where only SE's can do hospitals, 160' plus tall buildings, etc.)
   Some states won't accept the PE for structural engineering (Illinois requires SE 1 and SE 2 and eventually SE 3)

If you pass the SE-1
   Most states accept you as a PE and you can practice structural engineering
   Some states allow you to practice structural engineering but limit you to certain types of buildings (ex. - Calif where only SE's can do hospitals, 160' plus tall buildings, etc.)
   Some states won't accept the PE for structural engineering (Illinois requires SE 1 and SE 2 and eventually SE 3)

If you pass the SE-1 AND the SE-2
   Most states will accept you as a PE and you can practice structural engineering
   Some states have title acts where you can practice structural engineering AND call yourself a "Structural Engineer".  In these states those who pass the PE exam can practice structural engineering but CANNOT call themselves a "Structural Engineer".
   Some states like Illinois will allow you to practice structural engineering while not allowing PE's to do so.
   
The others above are correct that the SE-1 and SE-2 will soon go away and be replaced by the SE-3.  

I believe that you have to pass ALL the SE-3 to pass....no partial passing allowed as in the SE-3 where you used to be able to pass the morning or afternoon and then retake the other if failed.

Keep in mind, whatever you do, that you may very likely need to have the SE-3 to get comity in other states in the future.

 

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

One thing that I don't see mentioned here.  Didn't I read that the new test has another advantage?  I believe that you can pass certain sections of the test without passing the entire test.  If you fail certain sections, you only have to retake those sections. Right?

Regarding the SE, it's just for show in most states.  I don't need it since I have passed the CE PE test.  Though I feel I'd have a good shot, I would rather not take this test and have my employer know that I failed it.  Not worth the risk.

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

Here is a listing of some links relevant to the topic of SE licensing.  

This is a link to a power point presentation that summarizes the various US state's requirements for an SE:
http://content.seinstitute.org/files/pdf/9-StateRequirementsforaSEtoDesignStructures-SAR.pdf

Here's another one on various US State's requirements:
http://content.seinstitute.org/files/pdf/8-GEB-NCEES.pdf

NCSEA's Licensing committee's website:
http://www.ncsea.com/directory.aspx?GroupID=11

A short report on SE licensing in the US:
http://www.ncsea.com/downloads/groups/StructuralEngineeringRegulation.doc

At the very BOTTOM of this webpage there are links to the four parts of the 16 hour SE-III exam with detailed descriptions of its content:
http://www.ncees.org/Exams/PE_exam.php

 

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

So, do we know yet if california plans to sign on for the new SE-3, 16 hour exam?

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

I think you folks need to clarify the new designation that you are using to refer to the new combo SEI+SEII exam that will be in effect next year. It seems that most of you are referring to it as the "SEIII/SE3" exam. In my circle of friends, those of us that have SE licenses in Washington and California refer to the existing state-specific 3rd structural exam after the existing SEI and SEII as the SEIII. So referring to the new combo SEI + SEII exam as the SE-3 may be confusing to some people.

What I am wondering is those of us that have already passed the existing SEI and SEII exams is will we be able to get reciprocity as an SE in other states after the new exam is in effect?

Also,in California, to the contrary of what others have said, the SEI exam is not required to be an SE. You take the Civil PE, then the SEII and SEIII. As a civil engineer in California, you can practice structural engineering (just not hospitals, schools, etc.). without the SE license. I also wonder, will it still be legal for Civils to practice structural in California since the SEI was NEVER a requirement in California to begin with?

RE: 16 hour SE Exam

Blastresistant,

We refer to it as the SE-III because that is what the NCEES is calling it.

Quote:

What I am wondering is those of us that have already passed the existing SEI and SEII exams is will we be able to get reciprocity as an SE in other states after the new exam is in effect?
Depends on the state laws regarding "grandfathering".  Each state may handle it differently.

Quote:

will it still be legal for Civils to practice structural in California since the SEI was NEVER a requirement in California to begin with?
I think again it depends on how each state handles it - but my guess might be that there would be some states that would balk at granting licenses to someone who hasn't taken the SE-1.  I know when I applied to Illinois, they wouldn't accept the PE exam I'd already taken so I had to "retake" the SE-1 prior to them allowing me to take the SE-2.

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources