×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA
3

Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

(OP)
I came across these two definitions for Net Positive Suction Head and Net Positive Suction Head Available:

NPSH = p(s)/y + v(s)^2/2g - p(v)/y

and

NPSHa = p(atm)/y - h(e) - h(l) - p(v)/y

where:

p(s) = static pressure in fluid
y = specific weight of fluid
v(s) = velocity of fluid
g = acceleration of gravity
p(v) = vapor pressure
h(e) = elevation from surface to pump
h(l) = head loss

Correct me if I am wrong, but these two formulas should be representative of the same quantity, theoretically. This is, of course, the vessel from which the fluid is being pumped is at atmospheric pressure. Could someone confirm or explain this?

p(s)/y + v(s)^2/2g = p(atm)/y - h(e) - h(l)

I appreciate all the help.



 

RE: Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

(OP)
Yeah, these were the formulas they outlined. However, there is no distinction between the two. Given that the tank is exposed to atmospheric pressure and fluid is being pumped therefrom, the two formulas should be equivalent. The static head plus the velocity head should be the same as the leftover head from the atmospheric minus the losses (since it is in suction); they represent the same energies. Correct me if I'm wrong. Engineering toolbox does not explicitly describe this. I just want to know that my reasoning is sound.

RE: Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

2
Forget NPSH; that's just a mathematical definition.

The only two that are important are NPSHa and NPSHr.  You don't calculate NPSHr, you get it from the mfgr's pump data, so now there's only one you have to calculate, NPSHa, which must be >= NPSHr.

Use absolute pressures. (If tank is open or closed, it makes no difference to the equation, as long as you calculate the tank's absolute pressure correctly).  Vapor pressure is always absolute.

NPSHa = p(on_fluid_surface)/y - p(v)/y + v(s)^2/2g + h(e) - h(l)

I've substituted absolute pressure on_fluid's_surface for p(atm).

The sign convention for h(e) is positive when the fluid surface is above the pump and negative when below the pump CL.

Dropping the velocity term is common as it's almost always relatively small, not worth calculating, and yields a conservative result.


 

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25-50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities."-DOE statistic (Note: Make that 99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

(OP)
Thanks for the help Biginch, that's what I figured. I understand the concept I just got thrown off by the apparent differentiation NPSH and NPSHa.

RE: Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

tbarkerjr, if done correctly the two equations you mention in your first post will give identical results.

BigInch, my understanding is that the velocity term is by definition not part of the equation you mention.

Cilliers

RE: Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

(OP)
CJKruger, thanks for confirming that. I appreciate it.
 

RE: Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

By definition it is part of NPSHa, but it is often neglected (for good reason, especially since cavitation can often occur at values well above NPSHr).

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25-50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities."-DOE statistic (Note: Make that 99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

Actually velocity head is included in NPSHr by virtue of the test method used to determine the pump's NPSHr curve, so it can obviously be included in NPSHa calculation too, if the engineer wants to consider it.  During the test, the velocity head is a part of the total head measurement.

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25-50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities."-DOE statistic (Note: Make that 99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

tbakerjr,
Although it might not be applicable for your application you should keep that in mind: If you have a reciprocating pump installed the acceleration head must be considered, too. Although acceleration is part of the "pump's problem", the acceleration head is part of the NPSHA calculation.
 

RE: Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

BigInch, just to make sure I am not confused: Do you agree that strictly speaking the velocity term should not be part of the equation you posted 12 Jan 10 13:39 ?
  

RE: Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

No I do NOT agree that it should be removed from my previously posted equation.  That equation is correct to my understanding, which I can further reference by,  

Velocity head is included in the definition of Total Suction Head, Total Discharge Head, Total Head, and by reference to Total Suction Head in the definition of NPSH, is also included in NPSH as well.  This is found in the Pump Handbook - Second Edition by I.J. Karassik, W.C. Krutzsch, W.H. Fraser, J.P. Messina, Published by McGraw-Hill 1986, Section 13.3 in which they also say conforms to the same definitions and units of the Hydraulic Institute.

Velocity head is included in the definition of NPSH in "Centrifugal and Axial Flow Pumps", Second Edition, Section 2.6 by A.J. Stepanoff published by John Wiley & Sons 1957.

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25-50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities."-DOE statistic (Note: Make that 99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

BigInch, I agree with the references you quote, but think what they say is different from the equation.

1) What references say:
NPSH = Total suction pres - Vap pres
     = P_suction/y + v_suction^2/2g - P_sat/y

So you add the velocity per the references.

2) Usual method of doing calc:
P_suction/y + v_suction^2/2g + H_loss = P_vessel/y + H_Elev

Thus:
NPSH = P_vessel/y + H_Elev - H_loss - P_sat/y

Your equation can be correct if H(l) includes the recoverable velocity to pressure conversions (for example if entrance K=1.5 instead of 0.5), but this is not usually done.

Cilliers

RE: Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

Here's what I think they say.  In other words the same as the equation given in ione's hyperlink to the toolbox.

For a point after all losses have been accounted for.

    hs = ps/γ + vs2/(2g)         
    where
    hs = suction head close to the impeller
    ps = static pressure in the fluid close to the impeller
    γ = specific weight of the fluid
    vs = velocity of fluid
    g = acceleration of gravity

 

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25-50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities."-DOE statistic (Note: Make that 99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

BigInch,

It is not just your understanting, it's the way things are.

CJKruger,
Usually BigInch's understanding is the "right" understanding.

RE: Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

I always ignore velocity head for suction design purposes, but it is there in the definitions and the equation.  For troubleshooting suction problems, it may be prudent to include it just to help to understand what is going on there.  It can often explain an small reductions in pressure experienced when the suction line diameter or some other restriction, straightener, valve etc has changed the velocity nearby.

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25-50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities."-DOE statistic (Note: Make that 99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

BigInch, I think the equation in your post dated 12 Jan 10 13:39 is incorrect. But lets agree to disagree.

ione, did you actually compare the equation posted by BigInch on 12 Jan 10 13:39 to the ones in the link posted by you ?

Cilliers

RE: Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

CJK,  

You probably know by now that I never agree to disagree.  If there is some error in my understandings, I prefer to get it correct.  Please be clear in your comments, because at this point I have little idea of what you mean by all the questions and what your point eventually might be.  Additionally if you could point out my supposed error using either my or ione's reference equations, rather than typing out new ones (esp. without supplying definitions of all variables), it would be of help.  

Thanks   

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25-50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities."-DOE statistic (Note: Make that 99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

BigInch,

The equation posted by you is:
NPSHa = p(on_fluid_surface)/y - p(v)/y + v(s)^2/2g + h(e) - h(l)

I believe the correct equation is:
NPSHa = p(on_fluid_surface)/y - p(v)/y + h(e) - h(l)

Cilliers
 

RE: Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

I (finally think) I see the problem.  The formula I wrote 12 Jan is referenced to a point at the liquid surface in a tank or reservoir ... where the velocity and resulting velocity head is zero, so you can remove the v^2/(2g) if you like.  

CJK, It would have been a lot easier on me, if you just said that.  Sorry it took me so long to figure out what you were after.  That green dust on the floor under the bed was obviously kryptonite.alien

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25-50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities."-DOE statistic (Note: Make that 99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

Here's a diagram I posted to an NPSH problem a couple of years ago.  Perhaps more clear...or maybe not.

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25-50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities."-DOE statistic (Note: Make that 99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

BigInch,

you were right V2/2g != 0 (not equal) since V=Q/A where Q is the flow rate and A is the Cross sectional area at pump inlet. Your reference point should always be the pump inlet where you measure the static & dynamic heads (i.e. the total head) as well as the vapour head.
In most cases V can be ignored. If you prefer you can still calculate it using V=Q/A.

Regards,

RE: Difference btwn NPSH and NPSHA

I agree that you can ignore the velocity head, but only if the suction pipe is rather short and properly sized. If this is not the case, the friction caused by the velocity will be significant. And if additionally your static head is low, the fluid is warm or the atmopsheric pressure is low, the velocity head can make the difference between cavitation and a trouble free pump operation.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources