×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Linear motion translated to rotational
8

Linear motion translated to rotational

Linear motion translated to rotational

(OP)
Hello,
I'm interested in learning about gears & mechanisms that translate linear motion to rotational motion. Specifically, I need to translate the motion of straight-line linear motion (essentially straight up and straight down) into rotation, but rotation that is perpendicular to the linear motion.
Imagine a pencil that is inserted through a doughnut. I want to move the pencil up and down. I want the doughnut to rotate in one direction when the pencil moves up & and the opposite way when the pencil moves down.
Apologies for the crude description; I hope it makes sense.

Thanks very much.  

RE: Linear motion translated to rotational

I've seen it done, with hydraulic cylinders backdriving ballscrews.  I think they may have been multiple- start ballscrews, specifically engineered to be backdriven.

 

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Linear motion translated to rotational

In addition to the rack and pinion add a bevel gear set and you are in business.

RE: Linear motion translated to rotational

In short, it can be done.
Now you need to specify a load and a speed, so you can start the actual engineering.

 

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Linear motion translated to rotational

(OP)
Hello,

Thank you all for your responses. It is evident that there is a solution out there for me. A few more details:

The "doughnut" from my example is 3" in diameter and made of 18 gauge steel.

The doughnut needs to be able to rotate (on a plane that is perpendicular to the up-and-down action of the pencil) only 1". When the "pencil" is pulled down, the doughnut needs to rotate, say clockwise, 1 inch. Then, the pencil would be pushed back up and the doughnut would rotate back 1" to its starting position. That is the only motion I need. If the range of the up-and-down pencil motion can be restricted to less than 1", that would be ideal.

The up-and-down motion of the pencil will not be significantly repetitive. It's default position would be "up" and it will only be pulled "down" for a moment (basically rotating a switch to the closed position) before being returned to the up position.

The load is fairly negligible. Pulling down roatates a 3" diameter circle of 18 gauge steel 1" so that it locks onto a neodymium magnet. Pushing back up rotates the steel back to the starting position, but it will be fighting against the force of the magnet.

I hope that is clear and makes sense. Any more suggestions or advice you guys can offer me is greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

 

RE: Linear motion translated to rotational

Since the circumference is 3 pi, the rotation thru a complete revolution would be 360 degrees equals 3 pi.
So 1 inch of upward or downward movement would cause the disc or donut to turn 360 degrees divided by 3 pi
or 38.19718634 degrees.
Is this what you are looking for?
 

RE: Linear motion translated to rotational

Hi all,

I'm new to this forum, but, have you considered using an actuator ? seems like the "pencil" movement is the same as a rising stem valve & "doughnut" seems like multi-turn actuator.
 

RE: Linear motion translated to rotational

(OP)
Hello – I've looked at my project again and think there are a few more details I should share:

There is very little space above the "doughnut" (no more than 1/16th"). Therefore, the "pencil's" up and down motion would have to occur below the upper plane of the doughnut.

The mechanism I am in need of will be part of a hand tool. The doughnut is essentially a switch. As it rotates in one direction, it would open a pathway between a magnet and a piece of metal, thereby allowing for connection. When it is rotated back, it would close that pathway, thereby releasing the connection.

Since the mechanism is part of a hand tool, any components need to be small and durable.

Thanks again for all the comments so far. Any additional help and suggestions are greatly appreciated.
 

RE: Linear motion translated to rotational

Hi tobee11

It might be better if you can put a sketch on here, a picture speaks a 1000 words.

desertfox

RE: Linear motion translated to rotational

Following up on the the post by itascot you need to get hold of a "Scripto Mechanical Pencil" and look at the mechanism. Also if you can find a cutaway of an "Stockham Wedgeplug Valve" there is a very compact mechanism that raises and rotates the taper plug.

Anecdotal:
The mechanism for the Scripto Pencil and the Wedgeplug Valve were designed by the same person. I got to work with him when I started to school under the CO-OP plan, a long time ago.

RE: Linear motion translated to rotational

(OP)
Hello,

I have attached a very crude sketch of my system. I hope it is clear enough to convey the idea.

There are (2) sketches of the top-down view. One shows the system in it's open position (pathway between magnet and steel clear). The other shows the closed position (disk rotated so that it interfers with the pathway between the magnet and steel, thereby releasing the connection).

Thanks Unclesyd for the "Scripto Mechanical Pencil" and "Stockham Wedgeplug Valve" recommendations. I haven't found anything definitive yet, but will continue looking.

Thanks again for all of your help.

 

RE: Linear motion translated to rotational

Hi tobee11

I assume the 'U' shape around the bottom and sides, which appears connected to the central stem, all drops vertically 1" and at the same time rotates along with top disc (which also drops 1" vertical) to cover the magnet in closed position.
So where is the prime mover? ie:- is it the magnet or is there some other means.
The mechanisms that have been suggested mine included need an external force to get them moving.

desertfox  

RE: Linear motion translated to rotational

(OP)
Desertfox,

The 'U' shape can be considered a type of "sleeve" which surrounds the central stem. The sleeve and central stem are actually part of a handle. This component is part of a hand tool and the sleeve would be pulled down by the operator. The sleeve would be pulled down (appx 1 inch) and the top disc would rotate (appx 1 inch). There will be no room for the top disc to move up or down. It's motion will be restricted to rotation about the central axis. When required, the operator would then push the sleeve back up to its starting position, thereby rotating the top disc back to its starting position.

I hope that makes sense. Thanks again for all the great help.
 

RE: Linear motion translated to rotational

Sounds like the ratcheting screwdriver idea given as the first response to your question would be ideal.

M

--
Dr Michael F Platten

RE: Linear motion translated to rotational

Hi tobee11

So the central core is joined to the cover but not to the top disc, but as the cover is pulled down the central core is meant to rotate the top disc I presume?
So therefore as MikeyP points out, the ratcheting screwdriver looks like your best option.
What I can't see on your sketch is any bearing support for the top disc, so what holds the top disc in position.

regards

desertfox

RE: Linear motion translated to rotational

(OP)
Hi Desertfox,

The top disc is connected to the sleeve by the rod which runs down the middle of the central core. The top disc/rod/sleeve are not one piece, obviously, but in my mind they are the up and down/rotating system and the central core is just a foundation providing stability.

I also think that the Yankee, racheting screwdriver looks like a good bet. However, it seems I would have to have components custom made in order for it to work. Im afraid that would be cost prohibitive, so it looks like I'm going to have to go with a rotating "sleeve" connected to the top disc. The operator will rotate the sleeve and the top disc will rotate along with it. It wont be ideal, but it should get the job done and (hopefully) be simpler/less expensive.

If you have any additional suggestions, I would be very greatful. If not, then thanks again to everyone for all of the comments and help. I really appreciate it.

Tobee11

RE: Linear motion translated to rotational

Take a look a the pawl and worn of level-wind mechanism on a fishing reel.  

RE: Linear motion translated to rotational

Hi tobee11

Unless I am missing something, if the top disc is connected to the sleeve which is pulled down by 1", then the top disc also moves down by 1".
You said earlier the top disc can't move down by that amount.

desertfox

RE: Linear motion translated to rotational

(OP)
Hi Desertfox,

I have attached a few, more clear design sketches with some more detail on how I envision the system possibly working. When thinking of the ratcheting screwdriver, I was thinking that the top disc wouldnt need to move up or down at all. I thought of the top disc as being like the tip of the ratcheting screwdriver; it only rotates (I think). The rod attached to the middle of the top disc slips into an open channel within the sleeve and this is where the ratcheting action takes place. I thought that the interaction within this channel could produce the needed rotation.

Hopefully, the sketches are clear and make sense. Thanks again for all your help.

Tobee11

RE: Linear motion translated to rotational

Hi tobee11

Okay beginning to see now, so the top disc will actually sit on the disc with the magnets, unlike your original sketch where it shows a gap between the magnets and the underside of the top disc.
now going back to your post of the 20th how are you going to connect the sleeve to the top disc to achieve rotation only if you don't use the ratchet method.

desertfox

RE: Linear motion translated to rotational

(OP)
Desertfox,

To achieve the rotation only motion, I was planning on simply connecting the bottom of the rod which comes off the top disk to the bottom cover of the sleeve. In this way, the top disk, its rod and the sleeve would act as one single component. Obviously they would have to be assembled with the central core in between.

Does that make sense?   

RE: Linear motion translated to rotational

Hi tobee11

Yes I can see better now what your trying to do, the point I as was making was the ratchet connection will allow connection between the sleeve and top plate and achieve the rotational movement you require,I can't see a simpler method of connecting them at present that doesn't cause problems with pulling the top plate down vertically which your trying to avoid.

desertfox

RE: Linear motion translated to rotational

(OP)
Desertfox,

Thanks again for all your insights. Im going to get to work on the rotational sleeve version. Take care and thanks again to everyone.

Tobee11

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources