Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
(OP)
Does anyone know why IBM used to require 400 Hz power to their old mainframes?
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS Come Join Us!Are you an
Engineering professional? Join Eng-Tips Forums!
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. Posting GuidelinesJobs |
Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
|
Why 400 Hz in mainframes?Why 400 Hz in mainframes?(OP)
Does anyone know why IBM used to require 400 Hz power to their old mainframes?
Red Flag SubmittedThank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. Reply To This ThreadPosting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! |
ResourcesWhat is rapid injection molding? For engineers working with tight product design timelines, rapid injection molding can be a critical tool for prototyping and testing functional models. Download Now
The world has changed considerably since the 1980s, when CAD first started displacing drafting tables. Download Now
Prototyping has always been a critical part of product development. Download Now
As the cloud is increasingly adopted for product development, questions remain as to just how cloud software tools compare to on-premise solutions. Download Now
|
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
Still seems like a lot of money and space required for those power supplies. Doesn't seem like a lot of bang for the buck.
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
One comment that is open for correction/discussion by readers...for higher AC-power frequencies in aviation, isn’t there a savings in iron but not copper for otherwise similar systems?
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
The maximum speed from a 60 Hz. supply is 3600 RPM, with 2 poles, not adaquate for a gyro to function.
Speed of drive must be the reason.
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
I am new to this forum, and don't know the protocol.
400 Hertz is used on warships for gyro stabilized compasses, gyro stabilized operating rooms, gun turrent fire control, and automatic navigation systems, where high constant speed drive motors are required.
Aircraft use is based on the same conditions and need. The automatic flight control, and navigation systems, depend on gyros for stability.
Whenever I see 400 Hertz in use, I think speed plus weight and space, in that order.
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
Aside from physical size, a 2-pole 400Hz induction motor works out to run at 24,000RPM. That would be a nice disc-drive speed. AC…no pesky brushes and commutator maintenance! {Isn't 10kRPM hot stuff in PCs right now?}
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
What phasing and voltage is this 400 Hertz?
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
I'm kind of surprised this post set up such a heated debate, I really thought there would be one simple answer like there is on planes. Maybe there never was a good reason for them in the first place other than IBM marketing (let's lock them in to buying a power supply from us), and that's why 400 Hz is gone now.
Not to get too far off the subject, but does anyone have any info on either 1) how to request a data center forum be set up on this site, or 2) any other links for data center and reliability engineering? This is the best site I've found so far for engineering, but I've found little anywhere on the net that's particularly useful or focused for data center design.
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
There may not be a technical reason for the design baseline at all.
TTFN
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
Hope that info is useful.
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
I worked on the construction of an IBM data center in California for So. Cal Edison.
They moved their computer mainframes from San Onofre Nuke plant. I understand a radiation leak will erase the discs.
I asked them; "if they moved the humans for the same reason?" I understood that a radiation leak would erase them also. My humor was not appreciated.
3600 RPM is the max on 60 Hertz. There has to be a logical reason for 400 Hertz. I will research this with some friends from Sandia Labs.
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
400Hz is easier to create the - 0.85V (Logical 1) and the -1.85V (logical 0) from.
These powersuplies were capable of supplying 100-200 Amps and stayed within a few mV stable.
Try that with 60HZ....
The disk motors run on either 1 phase 50/60Hz or 3 phase 60Hz and when I remember correctly at 3000 RPM. (but I am not sure anymore)
Depending of the type of disk used (E.g. a 3330 had a 1HP 3phase 380V/50Hz motor... here in Europe)
The 400 Hz was not used for the disk motors.... only for the powersuppies.
Best regards, Jan
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
If you register your name with eng-tips and give me just a little more convincing detail I'll vote you for a star. . . .
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
The idea is that at 60Hz you have a 16.6 mS between top-top voltage and at 400 Hz only 2.5 mS.
A DC voltage under load will go down in voltage when the AC voltage is in the process of going through zero (alternate it polarity)
This is simple because the AC voltage is lower that the DC voltage you want.
The longer this takes the more the DC voltage will drop.
Where I live we call it the "rimple" of the DC voltage.
With 400 Hz this time is about 6x shorter then with 60 Hz
That means the this "rimple" is much smaller.
The powersupplies we talk about can handle 100-200 Amps.
This is such a heavy load that with 60 Hz you will have real problems keeping the "rimple" small enough.
When I remember correctly these powersupplies were allowed a max "rimple" of 3 mV... under full load...
Best regards, Jan
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
The only specifications I've ever seen for 400 Hz power is MIL-STD-704, which is nearly unregulated to start with, so any benefits that come from the higher frequency are completely overwhelmed by variations in line voltage and frequency.
I was going to go on about circuitry and decided to search for the history of ECL and ran across the following link about a computer built at Rice. Of particular note is the mention of 400 Hz power provided by a Navy SURPLUS generator:
http://www.princeton.edu/~adam/R1/r1rpt.html
So the answer may simply be that there was an abundance of surplus high power generators available after the war
TTFN
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
Cbarn, if I had the background to do a cost estimate to build 1970's vintage power supplies, do you think I would have posted this question in the first place? I've got a high respect for you & your eng-tips posts, but geez, you seem to have a wild hair going on this question. . . .
Anyway, I still tend to believe that the answer falls somewhere between the marketing thing and IR's surplus power supply suggestion.
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
http://w3.uwyo.edu/~jimkirk/cyber_era.html
The jist of which is that reliable, high DC power was a big issue and that 3-phase 400Hz provided a simple solution technically, and there was an abundance of 400 Hz expertise and equipment.
TTFN
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
interesting thread....slightly off topic I guess, but why did someone pick 400 instead of 350, 450 or even 500 ??
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
Why they picked 400 or 415 in planes though seems to be a good question. You'd think they'd want a nice multiple of 60 Hz since they were using M-G sets, but you couldn't get too high and still fit the windings in easily. 7x60=420. It's not clear to me, though, how 420 drops to 415 or 400 -- 5% slip? I guess frequency drift might not have been a big problem, though, so synchronous speed might not have been a concern.
Just a guess.
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
I see that there is an idea that 400 Hz powersupplies were used because there was a surplus of them.
Well, IBM mainframes were using brand new , specially designed powersuplies, so no surplus what so ever.
400 Hz in planes is for the same reason as in Mainframes.
Smaller transformers, smaller powersupplies, smaller electromotors... and for planes very important... therefor less weight
Beswt regards, Jan
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
The reason 400 Hz was used by a variety of companies, not just IBM, was the simple fact that the military had already developed the hardware, the design know-how and the engineering talent.
Don't forget that the electrical engineering talent that IBM and other companies used after the war were mostly busy developing military hardware during WWII.
So, in essence, while IBM hardware wasn't surplus, most of the engineers were. Additionally, remember that the first computers were almost exclusively used by the military, since they were the only ones that could afford it.
TTFN
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
1000 Hz is too high. Transformer coils are actually heavy duty chokes...so to say,...high resistance to high frequency.
I complete agree with you that other companies also made their own supplies.
I mentioned IBM because I knew the had/have their own designs.
One thing good about a war is that technoligy takes a leap forward.
Could very well be that the 400Hz suplies were developed in the war.
Best regards, jan
RE: Why 400 Hz in mainframes?
joshua.noonan@tag.com
Thanks!