×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Re-rate of pre-1968 vessels
3

Re-rate of pre-1968 vessels

Re-rate of pre-1968 vessels

(OP)
Does anyone know the reason why vessels that were built to the 1968 or previous editions of the pressure vessel code cannot be re-rated using the current code?

RE: Re-rate of pre-1968 vessels

Rerating is not prohibited but you may not use the higher design allowable stresses of later (current) editions of Code. Substantive changes in materials manufacturing and inspection methods have occured since the 1968 edition and the Code's requirements have been amended to reflect them and incorporate low temperature testing requirements thus permitting the higher design allowables.   

RE: Re-rate of pre-1968 vessels

MalcolmA (Mechanical)

what is the material specification for your static equipment built to the 1968?

L S THILL

RE: Re-rate of pre-1968 vessels

(OP)
What I have is a vessel built to the 1952 edition of the code. The material is A-212-B F.Q.

RE: Re-rate of pre-1968 vessels

Exactly what are you attempting to do in the rerate?

What environment will the material see?

 

RE: Re-rate of pre-1968 vessels

(OP)
I am not actually doing a rerate of the vessel.

We have vessel fabrication drawings but no certified documentation for the vessel rating. There is not a U-1 and the nameplate is missing.

I am to perform the calculations to verify the rating of the vessel. I was under the impression that you had to use the code of construction if the vessel was built prior to the 1968 edition of the code. I now see that you just have to use the allowable stresses from that code.

The vessel is in pentane service.

RE: Re-rate of pre-1968 vessels

Without a nameplate or U-1 form, are you sure that the vessel was built in 1952 and not to an earlier edition of Code? The safety factor may have been greater than the 4:1 (SMTS:design allowable stress).     

RE: Re-rate of pre-1968 vessels

(OP)
The only documentation that I have for the code of construction is in the general notes on the fabrication drawings:
 

Design, construction and welding to be in accordance to the 1952 edition of the ASME code for unfired pressure vessels.

RE: Re-rate of pre-1968 vessels

Stanweld,

Can you elaborate what exactly happened in 1968 Edition ASME BPV Code to make NBIC to choose this edition as the cutoff year? I cannot find info about significant changes in 1968 Edition other than Div.2 was first published in that year. The new impact test rule was not implemented until 1987.

RE: Re-rate of pre-1968 vessels

We have several vessels built in 1952 and 1953 from SA-212 GrB Fbx to the 1952 same code.  Nearly all have had a change in service so most designs have been rechecked using current software and the 17500 allowable from the 1952 Code.
Our only deviation from the original design is that for most of the equipment we require PWHT for all thicknesses due to service.
The only piece of equipment that presented any problem as to reevaluation of the original design was a Horten Sphere used to store anhydrous NH3 for several years.  

RE: Re-rate of pre-1968 vessels

Not to answer on behalf of stanweld, the requirements for re-rating pressure retaining items and prohibiting the use of higher allowable stresses was based on guidance from API 510. This standard had the requirement in place for vessels manufactured prior to 1968.

Why? Because from my recollection, the Bessemer steel-making practice (which produced plate steels with higher phosphorus contents and lower notch toughness) was phased out around the late 1960's and the basic oxygen furnace (blowing with oxygen instead of air) and electric arc furnace melting became the choice of most fabricators.
 

RE: Re-rate of pre-1968 vessels

The limiting 1968 Edition is somewhat arbitrary and an overarching reason cannot be given. Having been involved in steel making and vessel fabrication from 1968, we seriously began to embrace toughness criteria in our vessel designs and steel making practices after about 1970. This is not to say that we did not previously do so, only that we addresed the issues to a much greater degree. Also refer to Metengr's response which is well made.  

RE: Re-rate of pre-1968 vessels

Make sure you do a check for MDMT of that Firebox material.  For thick 212b it can be quite high.

RE: Re-rate of pre-1968 vessels

1. I try to understand the rational to check MDMT per current code rule. Pre-1987 vessels were exempted from impact test to -20F. If you use current MDMT rule (I assume Curve A in UCS-66), MDMT will be so high that most likely you will  not be able to operate the old vessel any more. There are plenty of such old vessels in operation right now.

2. In the old code, there is a 0.95 joint efficiency limit with full RT. When you rerate old vessels with latest software (with old allowable stresses), do you use E=0.95?  

RE: Re-rate of pre-1968 vessels

Quote:

In the old code, there is a 0.95 joint efficiency limit with full RT. When you rerate old vessels with latest software (with old allowable stresses), do you use E=0.95?

Yes you should. In accordance with the requirements of the NBIC, you cannot take advantage of a higher joint efficiency for re-rating.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources