×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

support sat on both side of a expansion joint

support sat on both side of a expansion joint

support sat on both side of a expansion joint

(OP)
I need to design a steel dunnage support for a HVAC unit. Four supporting posts will be sat on four existing building columns which located at both sides of an expansion joint. (2 columns on one side of the joint and the other 2 columns on the other side of the joint).

I am afraid of either horizontal movement due to temperature at the base of the Dunnage support or vertical movement due to different settlement on both sides of expansion joint will cause a problem of my dunnage support.

Is anybody here who solved this problem before? What kind of details I should use to handle this problem? Please help
 

RE: support sat on both side of a expansion joint

Design the support so that two independent systems sit on either side of the joint.  Mount the HVAC unit on rubber isolation mounts.  These will allow a fair amount of lateral and vertical movement.

RE: support sat on both side of a expansion joint

Not a good situation! I would try to place all 4 columns on one side of the exp. jt. and cantilever the frame over the exp. jt.

RE: support sat on both side of a expansion joint

I think you need to work out the expected expansion/contraction (if this is truly an expansion joint). Give us more inf, is this inside a building, on top of a roof?, I assume it is a suspended concrete, structure is this right?  Depending on the likely movement will give you the possible solutions. ie if the movement is smallish Ron's idea is a goer, however is the movement is largish, then you may have to do more to get you isolation.

Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in mud. After a while you realize that they like it

RE: support sat on both side of a expansion joint

Is this support hanging below the roof or supported on top of the roof?

RE: support sat on both side of a expansion joint

(OP)
Jike,  Columns are existing. No other structure member can be used to support the HVAC unit.

Ron,  it is difficult to support a independent system by 2 column on each side. Unit size is 25'x21'.
 

RE: support sat on both side of a expansion joint

(OP)
Hvac unit is located on the top of roof

RE: support sat on both side of a expansion joint

(OP)
Estimated movement: lateral: 4" vertical, 3"

RE: support sat on both side of a expansion joint

Have you told the HVAC guy to move the unit to a more reasonable location? Straddling an expansion joint is not very smart!

RE: support sat on both side of a expansion joint

If you really must cross a joint with those rather incredible movements, I suggest that you need to examine teflon slide plates for the horizontal movement and constant force support springs for the vertical movement.

Does the piping and ductwork cross the joint? if so, how is that handled? I used to do pipe supports on refineries and those movements are radical.

Michael.
Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.

RE: support sat on both side of a expansion joint

Since the vertical movement is settlement, I would design this such that the support can be adjusted over time and require re-levelling every 6 months. I am assuming little bit of tilting won't be a problem.

For the horizontal movement do you know the time period? Is this 3"max with a 1" variation over a day/week/season/year? or +/- 3" everyday?
 

Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in mud. After a while you realize that they like it

RE: support sat on both side of a expansion joint

struengineer didn't say what caused the estimated vertical and horizontal movements.  I thought it was an earthquake.

RE: support sat on both side of a expansion joint

hokie,
read his first post, horizontal due to temp, vertical due to differential settlement.
 

Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in mud. After a while you realize that they like it

RE: support sat on both side of a expansion joint

Guilty.  With those amounts of temperature and settlement movements, the building has more problems than support of a mechanical unit.

RE: support sat on both side of a expansion joint

A sketch of the building framing with the proposed HVAC on it could be helpful. Sme as above, I don't get where is the temp and differential settlement came from. Is it an occurrance due to the HVAC operation characteristics, that is to be accommodated by the existing building system, or else?

RE: support sat on both side of a expansion joint

Movement sounds very high but if you want a screwball idea...

Construct a platform to set the unit on.

Construct column extensions from the existing columns.

Suspend the unit platform with steel pins, clevis, turnbuckle and threaded rod.  The horiaontal movement is taken care of by the swing action of the steel pin/clevis connection (keep this lubricated)

Periodic Check the level of unit platform.  Adjustment of each corner with turnbuckles.

If there is as much vertical movement as noted the amount of adjustment available with a particular turnbuckle will need to be considered.  If that dosen't work consider using two rods from one end and a third from the other meeting at a middle plate with rod extension through the plate adequate to make the adjustment and locke with double nut.  

RE: support sat on both side of a expansion joint

(OP)
Thanks guys.

The unit has to be installed here and Pipe can be adjusted.

Estimated movements come from the following:

Horizontal movement: The existing expansion has a 6" gap (say, joint filer material 2" under pressure). I therefore assume that existing building is designed for 4" expansion. If my structure can handle 4" movement, it should be fine. Actually, any detail can handle 2" lateral movement, I will use it.

Vertical movement: According to original foundation design guild line, foundation should allow max. 3" settlement. I take it as max different settlement. Building has already been there for over 10 years. I guess it may not be 3" now.
 

RE: support sat on both side of a expansion joint

A suspend support system with lateral expansion/contraction is feasible as many have pointed out. I wouldn't worry vertical settlement after 10 years in service without noticeable problem.

RE: support sat on both side of a expansion joint

struengineer,
The 6" gap could be to prevent the buildings crashing together in an earthquake.  The 3" settlement could be total or differential, but would not be differential over the small distance of your mechanical unit.  You may have defined a problem that doesn't exist.

RE: support sat on both side of a expansion joint

(OP)
cntw1953, what is suspend support system, could you please give more detail?

Hokie66, You are right, it might not have problem. However, I cannot rule out the possibility. Therefore, I still need to consider it in the design.
 

RE: support sat on both side of a expansion joint

The word wasn't exactly correct.

If your unit is on top of the roof, and located in between four existing column below, for duct work, you can simply provide a new 4 posts frame with beams and hanger type support.

For equipment, you can provide beams in two layers (elevations), and let the unit sits in.

For either case, your unit will be above the roof, away from the expansion joint. The beam connections can be designed to accomodate the lateral movement, and the posts (as short as possible) shall be designed for the lateral load effects. If there is not much problem in fastening the posts to the roof, you may even consider adding thick rubber pads below the base plates (can be sandwiched) to absorb some vertical displacement and energy due to dynamic loads.  

Sorry for confusion caused by my poor choice of word. Hope I didn't miss the point this time.

RE: support sat on both side of a expansion joint

struengineer,
following on from what hokie is suggesting, is if you know a fair bit about the building it shouldn't be too hard to come up with a better guess on horizontal movement. It is a relatively easy calculation if you stay on the conservative side to estimate the expansiona nd contraction of the joint over the temputer change.

as for the vertical settlement, again i'm with hokie.

Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in mud. After a while you realize that they like it

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources