×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

STILL TRYING TO SELECT MATERIAL FOR TRANS. SHIFT FORK

STILL TRYING TO SELECT MATERIAL FOR TRANS. SHIFT FORK

STILL TRYING TO SELECT MATERIAL FOR TRANS. SHIFT FORK

(OP)
Here is the deal.  We had pretty much settled on 8620 and then carburize it.  Then we found out that 8620 is pretty much non-existent in flats.  So now we are back to the drawing board...  The part needs to be through hardened to around HRC 35 depending on alloy.  The fork tips need to achieve around HRC60-65.  I have looked again at 4340 and induction harden the fork tips but not sure how hard I can get with 4340 and also how it might work to try and surface harden a cross section of only .200".  I am concerned that is the whole thing goes to HRC60, we would have a reduced fatigue life.  

I do not want to get into nitriding and trying tokeep the process in house.  We were going to pack carburize the parts until we learned we cannot get 8620.  

So I guess we are either looking for a good structural material that will work with carburizing, or an induction hardenable alloy with similar properties.  Both commonly available in flats or rectangle bar, not cut from plate.   

RE: STILL TRYING TO SELECT MATERIAL FOR TRANS. SHIFT FORK

How big is this part?  A thickness of 0.2" is far from plate and bar - that is sheet territory.

For wear resistance on thin parts, you may want to consider ferritic nitrocarburizing.  Use a simple 1XXX or 51XX or 41XX or 43XX steel that meets your strength needs and then put it in the pit/furnace for the surface treatment.

RE: STILL TRYING TO SELECT MATERIAL FOR TRANS. SHIFT FORK

(OP)
The part varies greatly in cross section.  We would start with a 1x2x3 block and machine 65% of it away.  Fork tips are thin but the back of the part remains 1" wide x .75" squared.  This should keep the bulk of the part from trying to through harden but I am worried that trying to case harden a .200" CS will not happen.  

Again, we are looking to keep all processes in house.  We have an oven and willing to setup for induction heating but some of the case harden methods are too dangerous for us to mess with.  We planned to use pack carburization if we were to use 8620.  Very open to ideas on this one.  300K psi ultimate, HRC59+ surface....

RE: STILL TRYING TO SELECT MATERIAL FOR TRANS. SHIFT FORK

(OP)
Ironically, last time I quotes with Alro, they could only offer cut plate which would cost much more than bar.  I will chech with them again.  

If we cannot get 8620, we were looking at pack carburizing something like a 4320 or maybe 4340.  We planned to slow cool so as not to harden the part at that stage.  Then follow up with a harden process and temper..

Any thoughts on pack carb on 4000 class alloys?   

RE: STILL TRYING TO SELECT MATERIAL FOR TRANS. SHIFT FORK

4340 and pack carburizing incompatible. Be a little more flexible in your choice of process and many more solutions can come up.

If you can discuss with any heat treater in your area,he can provie a boquet of solutions. But, I gues you want to stay fixed with pack carburizing.!

Learn the rules,so you know how to break them properly.
Dalai Lama

_____________________________________
 

RE: STILL TRYING TO SELECT MATERIAL FOR TRANS. SHIFT FORK

(OP)
No at all.  We are open to ideas here but carburizing seemed the best solution at the time..

If we could find something that would induction harden to our specs, that could work too.  No one locally does nitriding.  We were pretty fixed on just using 8620 and taking them in to be carburized but the lack of material selection is killing this project.  Cutting from rounds simply is not cost effective.   

RE: STILL TRYING TO SELECT MATERIAL FOR TRANS. SHIFT FORK

If you are looking for low friction and high wear characteristics, maybe you should take a look at the grey and ductile irons.
You can get it in variety of bar and flat shapes as well as casting to near net shape.
Since your gears are already hardened steel the dissimular metals concept is in your best interest also. Works real well in engine cyclinders.

RE: STILL TRYING TO SELECT MATERIAL FOR TRANS. SHIFT FORK

Bob1111, I have followed this thread from its inception and have to tell you your approach is all wrong. Your desire to keep all of the processing in house is at odds with producing a serviceable part in a cost effective manner. You are severely limiting yourself here and you need to go back to square one. Start with a sound design, which it sounds like you already have. Then work with a metallurgical consultant to flesh out the material and processing details, both in house and out sourced. Gather the costs and determine if you have a viable program.

RE: STILL TRYING TO SELECT MATERIAL FOR TRANS. SHIFT FORK

Bob1111,

Your shift fork is basically a semi-circular finished shape.  I'd suggest trying this:

Call a local forging house and see about rolling a ring segment shape from 8620 rectangular bar.  There should be no tooling costs, it will minimize material scrap, you'll get a fairly close net shape, and you'll get forged properties to boot.

I think you'll be surprised how inexpensive those rolled rings might be.  The lower ram material cost also might be enough to offset the rolling charges.

Good luck.
Terry

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources