×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Rebar Lap Question

Rebar Lap Question

Rebar Lap Question

(OP)
So, I was visiting a job today to take a look at rebar for a very large concrete beam carrying significant load (vertical, horizontal, and torsional).  This is for an existing building, and the working space is minimal.  The horizontal reinforcement is spliced at roughly the third points - there are hooked horizontal bars at the ends extending roughly 40% of the span at each end and then a straight bar in the middle lapped with each of the end bars.

The problem I noticed is that one of the corner longitudinal bars is not within the stirrups (only the straight bar over the middle 30% or so of the span).  The two hooked end bars that are lapped with this particular straight bar are inside the cage, but the straight bar is outside the cage.  

I raised this as a concern for a couple of reasons.

1)  The bar has no confinement and is held in place only by ties to the stirrups (and bars that it's lapped with over the lap length.  

2)  Part of the reason that stirrups can develop Fy in such a short distance is because it's hooked over the top bar.  If that isn't the case then that could have an impace on the effectiveness of the stirrups at this location.

The more senior engineer I was with didn't think it was a big deal because 1. the lap length was larger than it needed to be, and 2.  There's a large amount of cover at this location > 6" so that the confinement issue really isn't a problem since that much concrete is not likely to spall off.

I'm still not convinced.  Can I get some second opinions?

I see the point about so much cover being unlikely to spall off, but it still doesn't "feel" right when I look at it.

RE: Rebar Lap Question

I would agree with you StructuralEIT, just because it seems logical to enclose it.  ACI 318-05 section 7.13.2.3 does have a little note about splices being enclosed by U stirrups with 135 degree hooks.  The section it refers to is for perimeter (torsion) beams, so I would think you could make a case to apply the requirement to your situation.  

I have also seen something in the code about allowing extra concrete as lateral confinement, (not exact wording) but I can't find it now.

I don't know much about statistics, but I do know that if something has a 50-50 chance of going wrong, 9 times out of 10 it will.

RE: Rebar Lap Question

Sketch please

RE: Rebar Lap Question

(OP)
Here is a sketch.  I have a section and a plan.  tThe rebar is in red in the plan just to make it stand out from the beam lines.  There is additional reinforcement that isn't shown in an effort not to clutter the sketch.

As you can see, one of the lapped bars falls outside of the stirrups.

RE: Rebar Lap Question

According to ACI 318 Article R12.13.2.1, stirrup anchorage is provided by a standard stirrup hook, as defined in 7.1.3, hooked around a longitudinal bar.

RE: Rebar Lap Question

If the end hook bars are in the tension zone, and the splice length is no less than required by ACI for non-contact splice, then I would go along with your senior on this. Especially if this is an isolate case.

RE: Rebar Lap Question

Actually I shall say " if there is no significant axial force on the beam ....

RE: Rebar Lap Question

The 1.5" cover is the critical direction and you need the confinement here.  

If the contractor says that it is too hard to relocate the outside bar, just provide a detail showing added extra cross-ties to confine the bar.  One or the other has to be done.  His mistake - His choice.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Rebar Lap Question

Is the longitudinal bar in tension or compression?

RE: Rebar Lap Question

(OP)
It's in tension.  Vertical load has it in compression, lateral load has it in tension, and torsion has it in tension - The net result is that the bar is in tension.

RE: Rebar Lap Question

I tend to agree that the bar in question should be enclosed by stirrups.  It may be 8" away from the outside face, but it is only 2" away from the top.

I would have thought that the stirrups would be 8" wider so that they enclose a larger rectangle for torsional loading.   

BA

RE: Rebar Lap Question

The bars should have been inside the cage.  Reference ACI 318 7.1.1 A day without making a rodbuster re-work something he claimed was "to hard to do" is like a day without sunshine.

But seriously, StructuralEIT, don't keep us in suspense.  How did it work out?

 

RE: Rebar Lap Question

the bar should be inside the cage to be used in your torsion calc. have you analyzed the beam with only 3 corner bars to see if it still works?

RE: Rebar Lap Question

(OP)
I analyzed the beam with that corner bar gone.  It still works from a strength standpoint.  The beam is very large to keep deflections extremely small, so minimum steel was used (bending in both directions and torsional, even though it wasn't above threshold torsion).  

Ultimately, the senior engineer said it's ok.  When I'm put in that position and I'm making the call, I'm going to have him redo it.  I don't like the way it looks and the "load path" (for lack of a better word here) looks incomplete to me.  

Thanks for the input everyone.

RE: Rebar Lap Question

Agree with MSquared approach. Give an alternate/remedial
detail. Especially at beginning of a job. Otherwise they will keep pushing and get sloppier (rodbusters).

RE: Rebar Lap Question

If it is just minimum steel, I wouldn't worry about it.

RE: Rebar Lap Question

(OP)
abusementpark-

It is just minimum steel, but the beam is a critical member.  It's supporting the entire 16" stone facade for a 4-story building, and supporting a large bay.  The stone has a fairly large eccentricity to the beam.  

The beam is seeing torsion, strong axis bending, and weak axis bending.  There is no redundancy, either, if this beam  fails, that whole side of the building will topple over (I'm not exaggerating).

RE: Rebar Lap Question

Well, I still think (see my earlier post) that the stirrups are not properly anchored as they aren't hooked around a longitudinal bar.

RE: Rebar Lap Question

miecz:

Unless there is concentrate load or torque in mid-span, isn't shear & torsion critical near the supports? The end hooks are enclosed as mentioned in the OP.

I think there is nothing inconvenient to ask the contractor to correct it - a middle piece straight bar that can be inserted without much trouble. But, I wouldn't say it is necessary, as this bar was adequately confined by concrete mass on 3 sides, and there obviously has no cause for the bar to pop out/crack the top face (with std. covers only).
Again, this is my person opinion only. I will definitely try to talk the contractor into correction.

RE: Rebar Lap Question

cntw1953

True, it would be worse if the unanchored stirrups were in a high shear region.   

RE: Rebar Lap Question

Agree.

RE: Rebar Lap Question

Am surprised no one suggested petrographic analysis of the cores to determine the concrete's general quality and condition, and to estimate the entrapped and entrained air contents.

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources