×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Alternate program recommendations

Alternate program recommendations

Alternate program recommendations

(OP)
I am learning ETABS, and I have to say it seems pretty unstable and is fairly frustrating. Does anyone have a recommendation for another program or one that seems more current with an updated interface? I spend a lot of time fixing small issues with the models, redrawing walls or slabs that don't connect.

Advice is appreciated. Thanks. :)

RE: Alternate program recommendations

i think thats the best thing with ETABS, (although  in STAAD, you can also see the failures)

The thing is, with Etabs, you can already know whats wrong with your model because it gives you some warnings and the coordinates of it

Its just giving the information on overlapping areas, lines etc.

One engineer told me once that software is all about GIGO garbage in garbage out, or if your in Europe you can say it RIRO, Rubbish in rubbish out
 

RE: Alternate program recommendations

I've played around with RISA, STAAD and RAM programs and ETABS seems to be far easier to use than the others.  If you have problems with elements not aligning and other geometric issues, you might review your input methods.  I've been using SAP and ETABS for about 3 years now and have not had the issues you are describing.  Modeling is fast and easy, analysis runs fast and is arguably the most accurate of the commonly available programs.   

RE: Alternate program recommendations

Skicat , how did you model ramps in etabs?is it in shell?or in membrane?
i cant see the real distribution of etabs from slab to beam
they said that the load is already transferred to the column, but i need to see it in beam,how can i do that?
please help me

RE: Alternate program recommendations

you should be very careful when modeling.. you can use snaps to ensure that your pointing on the right locations.. and if you want you can always check your model from time to time so that it is not hard for you to check the errors...
etabs is user friendly and one of the best when it comes to building designs..

RE: Alternate program recommendations

CSI recommends using thin shell elements for nearly all concrete wall/slab elements.  I'm not quite sure about the second part of your question.  Can you be more specific?  Thanks.   

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources