×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Metal Grain Direction Test?
5

Metal Grain Direction Test?

Metal Grain Direction Test?

(OP)
Is there a test that can be done to determine grain direction of stainless 301 1/4 hard sheet?  A part has been installed, but grain direction is not known.  Specifically, is there a test that could be done installed - meaning tests that don't involve bending the sheet, etc.?

Thanks,
Luke

RE: Metal Grain Direction Test?

You can perform insitu field metallography if you have access to the sheet and room for a man to polish the surface.

RE: Metal Grain Direction Test?

What difference does it make?  I don't know why 304 sheet would have a significant preferred orientation.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

RE: Metal Grain Direction Test?

(OP)
MikeMet - thanks - that is what we are doing.

EdStainless - my reference, MMPDS, has 301 1/4 Hard with very different properties for Fcy.  Do you have data to the contrary?

RE: Metal Grain Direction Test?

In order to have different properties in different directions you not only need elongated grains but the crystal orientation of the grains need to be non-random.
Are you talking about compressive yield?
How on earth can you measure that in sheet?
I suspect that the test is inaccurate.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

RE: Metal Grain Direction Test?

Ed,

Yes, the OP is referring to compressive yield strength.  MMPDS-01 is the successor to MIL-HDBK-5, and is considered one of the most reliable sources of mechanical property data for metals.  I checked the section on austenitic stainless steels and Type 301 specifically, and indeed it shows a considerable variation in the compressive yield and tensile yield strengths for cold worked Type 301: for the particular example of Type 301 1/4 hard, the reported Fcy and Fty are 44 ksi and 69 ksi, respectively.

I must admit, I was not aware that such anistropy existed for cold worked austenitic stainless steels, so I did a quick Google search for "Bauschinger effect stainless steel" and found many hits.  Here are two with freely available .pdfs that describe the Bauschinger effect in some amount of detail, including how compressive yield strength is measured in thin sheet materials:

STAINLESS STEEL – PLASTICITY AND CONSTITUTIVE MODELLING
http://www.worldstainless.org/NR/rdonlyres/CFDA0BEE-17D9-4DFE-9E55-6308919E1D05/2448/Stainlesssteelplasticityandconstitutivemodelling.pdf


MICROHARDNESS TESTING AS A METHOD OF EVALUATING BAUSCHINGER PHENOMENA IN COLD FORMED 301 AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL SHEET USED IN AUTOMOTIVE HEAD GASKETS
http://tptc.iit.edu/Center/Papers/Bauschinger-301SS.pdf


The references for the second paper probably show some of the definitive work that has been performed on this subject.

RE: Metal Grain Direction Test?

(OP)
Ed - thanks for the input

TVP - thanks for clarifying for me and for the input and the papers.  I am looking at them now, although they are a little above my materials pay-grade...

Now, it gets interesting.  We had a lab examine some samples, and they send back this:

"The subsequent metallurgical examination revealed each plate to be cross-rolled with the grain structure recrystallized, i.e relatively equiaxed grains were observed.  A grain size of 7 or finer per ASTM E112 was observed."

So, based on the equiaxed grains, are the properties the same in both directions?  And, if yes, which properties are they - the original L or LT?

RE: Metal Grain Direction Test?

(OP)
TVP - I just realized you're talking about the difference in Fcy and Fty.  I'm talking about the difference in Fcy L and Fcy LT.

RE: Metal Grain Direction Test?

luket,

Same thing, really.  Anisotropy can manifest in multiple directions, but it is due to the same cause - preferred orientation of structure formed during thermomechanical processing.

RE: Metal Grain Direction Test?

Rather than grain isotropy I would suspect that residual stresses play a major roll in this.  What are the L and T tensile strengths?  If the grain structure is equiaxed then the strengths should be the same.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

RE: Metal Grain Direction Test?

(OP)
CoryPad - thanks - I think I see your point.

Ed - I think you're right.  According to my reference, MMPDS, the tensile strengths are almost the same.  The only real difference is the Fcy in the L direction.

I know after 10 posts, the question starts losing it's charm, but if anyone is still interested, here is a picture of the grain structure.  Given this pic, is there anyway to know which direction the reduced Fcy is in?

RE: Metal Grain Direction Test?

The L direction is left to right (horizontal) in the image.  So, if MMPDS-01 lists Fcy in the L direction to be low, the resistance to compressive stress will be low in the horizontal direction.

RE: Metal Grain Direction Test?

(OP)
Corypad - thanks, can you give me your rationale?  Are you basing this on the horizontal marks across the surface, or something based on the grain structure itself?

RE: Metal Grain Direction Test?

The horizontal lines are grooves that form during etching (was this chemical or electrical?) that follow chemical segregation and other structural irregularities that form during thermomechanical processing.

RE: Metal Grain Direction Test?

Cory, I think that the L direction is in-out of the page.  The top-bottom is definitely the thickness of the sheet.  But the strain lines would tell me that the left-right dimension is the width of the sheet
I don't see any grain deformation in this photo.
Maybe they took the wrong section?

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources