Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...This is a very good site. Please keep it running. Thanks and wishing a great health and success for the site and its owners..."

Geography

Where in the world do Eng-Tips members come from?
arellanoma (Civil/Environmental)
2 Dec 09 18:33
Hello,

I'm working on a drainage project at work which involves a temporary fix on an existing box culvert.  For some reason, the expansion portion of a box culvert was built approx 20" higher than the flowline elevation.  As a result, water ponds due to a "mini-dam".  A temporary solution will require us to fill a portion of the existing RCB with concrete.  We're matching the FL upstream up to the "mini-dam".  I have been asked to provide a detail for this work and I don't know what information to place on the detail.  I have a note stating to "roughen the existing concrete and chip as required for bonding".  Should I include a dowel for the new concrete?  The problem is that on one end, the concrete fill is approx 6" and 0" on the upstream end.  I appreciate any advice.
msquared48 (Structural)
2 Dec 09 18:37
Are you sure that this mini dam is not an intentional energy absorbing feature to dissipate energy in the system?

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

arellanoma (Civil/Environmental)
2 Dec 09 18:49
Yes, that was a possible reason for the "mini-dam", but it was ruled out because the outlet of the RCB flows into a golf course.  During a storm, the majority of the golf course is flooded.    
Ron (Structural)
2 Dec 09 20:03
Good point, Mike.  If that's not the case, then you are on the right track for an overlay patch.  Use dowels, even small ones.  Do not feather the overlay.
cvg (Civil/Environmental)
3 Dec 09 12:42
you cannot feather your overlay to zero inches using normal portland cement concrete. You might be able to do a fairly thin epoxy overlay. Otherwise, you will have to live with perhaps a 2 or 3" lip at the end. I would suggest some of the following methods of surface prep: sand blast / shot blast / water blast to clean and roughen the surface. Perhaps bush hammer prior to placing the overlay. Your spec should require contractor to submit his methods before construction and engineer approval of the finished surface prep prior to placing any overlay. You may also want to use a bonding agent.

You cannot dowel thin overlays effectively, you will either need to achieve a good bond or place a thicker overlay
arellanoma (Civil/Environmental)
3 Dec 09 13:25
Thank you all for the advice / info.  I'll definitely include the method request in our specs.  

 
csd72 (Structural)
4 Dec 09 15:19
Cut a section out of the surface of the concrete to increase the minimum thickness of the overlay.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close