×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Shear problem

Shear problem

Shear problem

(OP)
I am trying to work out the possible failure of a stair tread. I attach a drawing.

If the spindle is pushed to its extreme, how would the stair tread fail? (assume the steel bits are strong enough).

Do I apply the force P as a shear stress concentrated on the top of the dowel or as a force uniform across the bearing. Which shear area do I consider? A cut through the timber or the bearing area of the timber - both seem logical to me.

Timber is European Beech D35 grade, Steel Stainless.

RE: Shear problem

I think you would have a stress varying vertically - You show a triangular stress, I wonder if it would be positive on top and negative on the bottom of the tread (i.e. a bow-tie shear diagram shape)

 

RE: Shear problem

I think it could be more like a pole footing type of distribution.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Shear problem

In the thread, for vertical support for almost any washer a truncated cone in shear about 2 mm wide ring below and say 45 deg aperture above can develop, then calculate shear for a cylinder amidst that truncated surface cone. For lateral support a fixity scheme for a cantilever may work.

RE: Shear problem

I tend to agree with placing a concentrate load on top of the u notch as indicated by your question "pressure concentrated here?". There is also a concentrate load at inner bottom corner of the notch to form a couple and a horizontal resisting force.

The horizontal resisting force works on the remaining area below the noth, thus the remaing area suffers tension and shear, I think shear will control though.

  

RE: Shear problem

It is not a clearcut question.  The answer relies on workmanship.  Does the spindle bear tightly against the timber?  Is the bolt extending through the wood tread tightened to a snug fit?

How might the stair tread fail?  Probably by a shear failure each side of the spindle.  A chunk of the tread would simply pop out.  

BA

RE: Shear problem

(OP)
Thanks for the response.

The spindle is a tight fit and probably is dowelled deeper than shown.  The bolt and washer are a tight fit.

I thought that the washer would act as a lever and dig into the underside of the tread.  The bottom edge would then be a fulcrum putting all the pressure on the top lip (I am looking for the worst case scenario). The top fibres would crush - localised bearing pressure (shear perpendicular to grain) - until a surface area would be achieved that could resist further deformation or the timber would shear or split along the grain.  I am trying to picture the surface area resisting the shear.  As the surface area increases, the angle of the bearing-area rotates and the resultant force moves down. Its a non-linear problem but I am trying to put math to it.

RE: Shear problem

If you are trying to treat the truncated cone shear surface mathematically then you may find usefull Mathcad. You set mathematically the equilibrium, then instruct the program to search for the solution (if there's a single one) or optimize for the safest value that gives the lesser resultant available from the setup as portraited in your model.

RE: Shear problem

(OP)
Dear ishvaaag

I am not sure what you mean by the truncated cone.  Do you have a reference that I may read to get an understanding.

I submitted my calculation by treating the problem as single-shear on the bearing-area of the dowel.  The timber is very under-stressed so should be ok.  Doesn't detract from my inability to analyse the problem (in time) though.

RE: Shear problem

(OP)
If I modelled the spindle connection using an FEM program, would I get an accurate result?  I have only used FEM once or twice (never trusted computers).

RE: Shear problem

The thickness of tread and depth of recess are important variables.  The size of bolt is also an important variable as it will effectively act as an extension of the spindle.

How does the system behave?  If you place a dowel in a tight fitting hole with no bolt, it can carry moment by bearing against the sides of the recess (a bow tie stress distribution as stated above).

If you omit the recess but use a bolt, the spindle can carry moment by compressing the wood on one side and tensioning the bolt.  Shear can be carried by a combination of bolt shear and friction from the compression between steel and wood.

If you provide both recess and bolt, the problem becomes one of strain compatibility.  It could be solved using FEM if you know the properties of the wood with any degree of confidence.

BA

RE: Shear problem

(OP)
I would model the tread using the tables provided in EN338 for D35 timber.  The bolt would add a pre-tension equal to the load/area of the spindle-bearing in the dowel (area = 1475mm2, stress perp. to grain = 2.8 N/mm2, F = 2.8/1475 = 4 kN). I suppose reinforced concrete behaves similarly but timber instead of concrete.

RE: Shear problem

I don't really have anything to suggest about the detail, except to say it is a poor detail if the balustrade spindles are cantilevering.  It will be very flexible, especially after shrinkage takes place.

If the top rail is stiff enough to take the load, then the detail is not so bad.  In that case, you would just need galvanized or stainless screws to tie the spindles down vertically.  These wouldn't need to be at every spindle.

RE: Shear problem

In conclusion, your detail is not very good.  Try to come up with a better one.

BA

RE: Shear problem

(OP)
The stair exists, the handrail is firm, it looks good and the architect that designed the stair is very happy. For some reason, I always get the job of checking the work after its built!

I was checking the tread and part of the check involved the failure of the bolted connection, or, how it would fail.  In the end, I checked the connection against shear using the logic used in the Timber Designer's Manual.  I only have a limited number of timber books so I could not find an example on leverage.  I have split many pieces of timber using a crow-bar (never on beech) so I have a fair idea how the step may fail.  To be fair, if the handrail fell off and all the load were placed on one of these spindles, the spindle would bend before the beech would break.

However, after this discussion, I think I am able to solve the problem for myself. Your comments on the bow-tie effect and strain compatibility and the pre-stress applied by the bolt have made the problem much simpler to envisage. May even test it out in the workshop.

Still not sure what the "truncated cone" theory is though? I have an idea but I am thinking of punching-shear.

Cheers. Good forum    

RE: Shear problem

Base on the NDS (National Design Specification from the American Wood Council) Appendix I "Yield Limit Equations for Connections" assuming the bolt will not bend. Failure due to moment would most typically be a Mode Type II (divided by two as you have only a single wood member). But the NDS assumes that the bolt is 1" or less in diameter with a standard size washer each side of the connection. See the attached file.
 Personally, I would not do or approve this type of connection for a handrail in wood.

Garth Dreger PE
AZ Phoenix area

RE: Shear problem

Well, I certainly referred to some kind of extension of the theory used in reinforced concrete. With a washer of minimum strength, it needs be to be sheared through the wood to make the joint fail in shaft tension. And anytime you use a washer in tension the compressive forces concentrate mainly in a ring mainly near the shaft. So a truncated cone may not turn an exorbitant proposal. Just for learning next days will look about someone thinking (in written) along these lines.

RE: Shear problem

Maybe you can significantly decrease the spacing on your anchoring posts and share the load better.
 

RE: Shear problem

The holes in the photo appear to be too close to the end of the tread.

BA

RE: Shear problem

In response to your original question, the tread will fail in bending - no doubt about it.  A chunk of stair that includes part of the bolt hole will rupture.

It really does look like it was designed by an architect...

"Having said that" (reference to comedians Larry David and Jerry Seinfeld), I'd be curious to hear the results of your test.

tg

RE: Shear problem

hemis...the actual distribution is a bit more complicated than would first appear, but I would consider your bearing area after initial mobilization to be about 1/2 the projected diameter of the spindle.  It would act on a dual surface from the top of the tread to the spindle counterbore depth, from the counterbore to the edge.

That's a little conservative since the actual shear area will extend in a triangular distribution from the bottom of the counterbore to near the bottom outside edge of the tread.

Also, you will have a notch effect at the bottom of the counterbore.

RE: Shear problem

If the spindle is too close to the end of the tread, you could have a splitting of the tread starting at the top of tread and extending down as the spindle is pushed out.

BA

RE: Shear problem

The question is why the holes dislocated that much.

RE: Shear problem

The spindle has a diameter of one inch.  It will be prying against the top of the wood tread when an outward force is exerted on the handrail.  The end distance (center of spindle to end of tread) appears from the photograph, to be about one inch.

The minimum permitted end distance for a one inch bolt by CSA 086 (Canadian code) is 7", so the spindle appears to be too close to the end of the tread.   

BA

RE: Shear problem

My claim was on the first step from right, the inner edge of holes looked like fell right on the wood seam. The bore holes on the next (middle) step seems centered. It may not have any significance, just point out what was observed from the photo.  

RE: Shear problem

(OP)
Chaps

You are frightening me. This stair is not going to move.  A herd of elephants are not going to hurt this stair.  When I was putting together my "modes of failure" list, I considered the handrail falling off, or the weld failing, and the bar being pushed or pulled in its socket.  BAretired kindly offered the advice about the moment, compression on the bolt and strain compatibility and that is where I am going to look.

I will take on board all the advice on centre-ing and edge space-ing and if I ever have to design a stair I will remember.

Many thanks  

RE: Shear problem

hemis,  Wood changes over time, so what it is today will not be what it will be like ten years from now. This is something many people do not understand. The edge distances, design values, formulas, etc. for wood design account for this. I just hope that when the handrail becomes loose that they replace the wood and not just keep trying to tighten (and thus crush the wood) the bolts.

Garth Dreger PE
AZ Phoenix area

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources