×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

UL component substitution

UL component substitution

UL component substitution

(OP)
We are attempting to make our UL component listing as generic as possible so that in the future we can source other vendors without updating our listing.

Say we had a generic PLC listed as a part of our control box that said something like "Programmable Logic Controller - Listed (XXXX), rated input: 100-240 VAC, 50-60 Hz, 120 VA."

Now say we found a vendor that supplied a similar PLC for half the price that had a rated input of: 100-240 VAC, 50-60 Hz, 60 VA (and is also listed under the same UL category code).  Are we safe to begin using the cheaper PLC without fear of a variation notice during an inspection?

My thinking is that the new, cheaper PLC uses half the power at the same voltage as the old PLC, making it safer, therefore requiring no action in UL's eyes.

Thanks in advance for the help.

RE: UL component substitution

Dave,

In your UL file will be a list of "critical components" that cannot be substituted without prior evaluation.

If the PLC is on the list, you can't substitute without permission.

If not on the list, it's best to go ahead and notify UL anyway.  Variance notices after you've produced a bunch of product can be expensive!

Good on ya,

Goober Dave

RE: UL component substitution

Dave,

The fact that UL accepted (or made) the entry in your UL file whereby the PLC manufacturer name/model number was not required is a very good sign.
In my experience with these generic file entries, UL tends to put the headline electrical ratings and sometimes a particular parameter in this case VA, is not safety critical to the end product. In my opinion you would be ok with your alternate PLC of the same UL CCN (category control number). Like with conditions of acceptability for recognized components, check any UL markings issued by the manufacturer that form part of their UL listing and ensure you comply with those.

John

RE: UL component substitution

He said attempting...not approved..
But IMO my answer would be NO as 60VA is not equivalent or larger than 120VA.

But if you put in a "Programable logic controller with a rated input of 100-240VAC, 60VA minimum" and you prove that the 60VA model passes then you can use a 120VA model or the 60VA model.

RE: UL component substitution

I'm not familiar with PLC ratings...
My response above was based on my assumption that the VA rating is related to the what's attached at the output connections and that a lower rating means less devices can be attached before it is overloaded. I'm thinking my assumption was incorrect.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources