×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Double Beam Flexural Strength

Double Beam Flexural Strength

Double Beam Flexural Strength

(OP)
Folks,
I am trying to analyze a situation on an existing building where we are trying to add an additional WF beam on top of an existing W beam to boost up the strength. (essentially one W beam stacked up on top of another)

How does one calculate the flexural strength of such a member? Are there prescribed code procedures for this? Can sectional properties (Z, S) be calculated for this section and applied to AISC formulae to calculate the various limit states? In addition welding between the top flange of the existing beam and bottom flange of the new beam will be made for shear flow.

RE: Double Beam Flexural Strength

slickdeals,

First principles such as parallel axis theorem, same code procedures as elsewhere, yes but use the singly symetric rules,not really shear flow but longitudinal shear yes.

Here is a spreadsheet in ASD to get you started but I cannot verify its accuracy.
 

RE: Double Beam Flexural Strength

(OP)
not really shear flow but longitudinal shear yes.
Please explain.
 

RE: Double Beam Flexural Strength

slickdeals,
This is just like a haunch for a portal frame, This member can be treated like a beam in most codes, but it will normally be a slender instead of compact classification.
I attach a spreadsheet by Alex Tomanovich, he has published these free on the web and they are bloody good. Should help you design to AISC 9th Ed. (ASD)

Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in mud. After a while you realize that them like it

RE: Double Beam Flexural Strength

slickdeals,

Shear flow is a different thing entirely.

It is the flow of shear stress around an unsymetric cross section such as a channel. Look up unsymetric bending and you will see what I mean.

This may seem like pedantics but every engineering tern has a specific meaning and it is best to ensure we use them properly to avoid misunderstandings.

RE: Double Beam Flexural Strength

There are several ways that you can approach the problem, One way is to design the new beam to support the full load, and provide connections to transfer the loads from the existing to the new.  A second would be to design the two beams to act as a single unit.  If the second approach is used you would first need to think about the construction sequence.  Is the  load on the existing beam going to be relieved prior to adding the new member?  Or would the exising beam provide temporary support?  Is there going to be support added to the compression flange of the new beam or will the unbraced length of the new section be the full length of the beam?  Is the load from the existing beam is not relieved, there may be some stresses "locked in" that must be accounted for.  The connection between the two sections should be designed for the shear flow based on the built up properties, there are good referenced in many mechanicas of materials texts.

RE: Double Beam Flexural Strength

If the beams do not need to be composite, then, discounting interstitial friction, there is no shear flow.  

If they are separate, then they should be designed to deflect the same, sharing load based on the ratio of their respective I values.  For gravity loads, if the top beam sees the load first, then there is no problem.  If the bottom beam sees the load, then a connection between the two beams will be necessary to transfer some of the load to the top beam.

It all depends how you design the system as to what you end up doing.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources