Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...it was ingeniously designed and all those clicks were for my own good... and that was even before I got my speedy and useful answer to my tekkie question that I eventually posted..."

Geography

Where in the world do Eng-Tips members come from?

Phi and C of Diabase material by Hoek Brown Failure Criterion

geochris (Geotechnical)
13 Nov 09 14:19
First Time Poster here!  Please bear with me.

I am evaluating a small roadway re-alignment project involving a rock cut slope in predominantly diabase material (and ophiolitic material).  Length of cut is approximately 200 feet, max depth of cut will be ~8 ft horizontally, with a max slope height of 25-30 feet.  I am proposing a 1/2H:1V or 3/4H:1V cut slope with a catchment area below for any rock fall.  Due to the hardness of the rock, I am going to propose blasting.  

Small trenching investigation performed, and some large block samples were taken to the lab and cored.  These were tested for Unconfined Compression.
Unconfined compression averaged 7000 psi.

Material is decribed as massive, with random fractures (partially to fully healed with calcite).  Very hard upon removing the weathered material.  

Using the Hoek-Brown Failure Criterion, I came up with a Phi of 48 degrees and a Cohesion of 2300 psf to input into my slope stability model.

Do these values seem reasonable for modeling hard rock?  

The 48 degree phi angle makes sense.  I do not have a feel for cohesion of rock.

Thanks!!!
fattdad (Geotechnical)
17 Nov 09 10:29
You're welcome to review my thesis:

http://home.comcast.net/~fatt-dad/thesis.pdf

f-d

¡papá gordo ain't no madre flaca!

geochris (Geotechnical)
21 Dec 09 13:06
Thanks, Fattdaddy.

I took a look at your dissertation, when you originally responded to my post.  Sorry for the delayed response.  It was very useful to look and see that the phi and C values I was getting were in the range of previously analyzed materials.  I am going forward with my analysis using a phi of 48 degrees and a cohesion of 1000 psf.  The cohesion was reduced to less than half of the given value to give me a bit of conservatism in the analysis, as this is my first time using this analysis on hard rock.

Bombs away!

Chris

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close