×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Power, Tire width, weight distribution
2

Power, Tire width, weight distribution

Power, Tire width, weight distribution

(OP)
Hi There,

I am building my car for time attack and I wonder how to calculate proper tire width.

Let's take stock toyota supra mkiv 320 bhp, 1560 kg, 51 to 49 weight distribution, front tires 235/45/17 rear 255/40/17, spring 7,5kg for front and 3,8kg for rear.

Now we striped car and we have 520 bhp, 1280 kg, 58 to 42 weight distribution. We are using spring 18kg for front and 12kg for rear.

I have no idea how to approach to that problem. Any formula idea etc ?

RE: Power, Tire width, weight distribution

I think the way this is "calculated" for a race car is as follows:

1) Are your tires narrower than that allowed under the regulations?  If so.  They are too small.

2) Are your tires perilously close to rubbing bodywork?  If not, they are too small.

RE: Power, Tire width, weight distribution

Agreed, I don't think you ever see a closed wheel car that uses anything smaller than the maximum allowed/practical, and width is far more beneficial than diameter if you are ekeing out the last bit of clearance.
 

Cheers

Greg Locock

SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Power, Tire width, weight distribution

(OP)
OK guys, but at some point friction should be taken under consideration. 80% of racing is acceleration with to wide tires I will lose on acceleration.

OK, I can use 310 wheel at front and rear but I need to put wider rim for front wheels +6kg of rotating mass. I lose on acceleration...

 

RE: Power, Tire width, weight distribution

True. Can you get hold of any performance data for your tires?  

Cheers

Greg Locock

SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Power, Tire width, weight distribution

With 560 bhp in a 1280kg car I don't see rolling resistance (is this your "friction"?) or wheel inertia as being your limiting factor.  

I'd rather have more traction out of the corner, and higher cornering speeds.  Especially with the "spins tires in anything under 4th gear" P/W ratio you have.

 

RE: Power, Tire width, weight distribution

(OP)
GregLocock
I will check it and post it.

imcjoek
Studying power is pointless. let say we have 200 hp instead of 560, wideness of the wheel will make huge difference.
 

RE: Power, Tire width, weight distribution

gotta concur with imcjoek.

however you can easily enough calculate the differences in power loss to spin up 2 wheel/tire sets of known inertias and decide for yourself if the inertia gain is worth the added traction.

RE: Power, Tire width, weight distribution

(OP)
I can't find good formula to calculate power lose, Junior37c could you share.

I found some ideas here: http://www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-321017.html

GregLocock
Curious but Dunlop here don't know much about them, except price of course. I asked guy how they recognize compound and he said he had to write in the email no idea how they mark it on wheels.

Greglock
I tried to approach to your advice, even it's heavier, to install wider wheel I need to use wheels with different offset. Then I will change tire track ratio, front will be wider then rear.

RE: Power, Tire width, weight distribution

F = Ma
T = I[alpha]

Make sure that you keep a and alpha consistent with each other.


On the driven wheels, rotational inertia shouldn't matter as long as you've got enough torque back there to make them spin.  Up front is a slightly different story, but is clouded by things like better lateral grip and predictability (don't shortchange that last item).


Norm

 

RE: Power, Tire width, weight distribution

I have a feeling you are over-thinking this.

There is a thing called benefit-cost ratio.  You are spending much of your resources (time!) thinking about something that is not going to have a significant effect on your lap-time (benefit).  

Fit the biggest tires you reasonable can.  Then spend the time you save running laps and dialing it in.  You will come out ahead of the guys that have optimized their lug nuts to three decimal places.

RE: Power, Tire width, weight distribution

(OP)
NormPeterson
Thanks for basic formulas :), I am a little more advance.

"...it shows drawbar pull/1000 pounds to be....(depending on surface)

Asphalt....... 12 to 22 lbs.

The formula for air resistance is.....
F=FA x .0025 x MPH^2

F is additional drawbar pull needed to overcome air resistance
FA is frontal area in square feet
MPH is vehicle speed, miles per hour

imcjoek
Perhaps you are right but I read a few books about chassis engineering and I've always read assumption like those ... let say we have equal weight distribution wheels should be same f/r. Should be wider on more loaded side but with fr cars should be different ... but nobody explain how :)
 

RE: Power, Tire width, weight distribution

Lostboy - it was not my intent to supply a more complete derivation.  Just point you in the right direction since that was the need expressed in the original post.  I did give you one direct hint that you'll need for estimating the effect of heavier, wider wheels that may not show up in the physics link.

More hints - there is more than one force, more than one 'I', more than one [alpha], etc.  What you're looking for with respect to wheel weights and acceleration potential is entirely possible to determine using a spreadsheet solution.


Norm

RE: Power, Tire width, weight distribution

An alternative is to download Bosch Lapsim and play with that to your heart's content. It will at least give you some idea of the trade-off between inertia, drag, and grip, for a circuit.

I would not (do not) use it INSTEAD of understanding the first principles and hand calcs, but it does give you a better insight.

Bet you end up with the fat tires.

 

Cheers

Greg Locock

SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Power, Tire width, weight distribution

"58 to 42 weight distribution."

58% of the weight is now on the front wheels?

RE: Power, Tire width, weight distribution

Ow, good catch. Well your next winter project is to move the engine back by a couple of feet or more.

Cheers

Greg Locock

SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Power, Tire width, weight distribution

(OP)
yeap, We've already started working on that. I will post pictures ;)

RE: Power, Tire width, weight distribution

All opinions and posts seem to have merit.  Fine.  However, I've already been there and done that and I can tell you for sure that I like MY approach to the question better...

Warning...If you do not have a lot of time, a race car with several "spare everything" and a large sum of $$$, this may NOT be appropriate for you!!!

In the '80's I just penned a deal to test for one of the major racing tire mfgrs.  After the better part of the summer, I knew EXACTLY which tire worked best! ;o)

I've always been BIG  on t and e. (Sound familiar, Greg?)

Rod

RE: Power, Tire width, weight distribution

Some curious bacteria has invaded my desk and eaten EVERY book on tires and handling.

Hmm, well I found one.

It says, ultimate grip is proportional to tire width ^0.15, which sounds a bit low to me. So going from a 200 to a 300 mm width tire gives you about 6% more latacc. But you can soften the compound a bit and get some more.

The cornering stiffness also increases. This is a good thing for a race car as it means you'll get less cornering drag. CS is proportional to tire width^.3, that is you'll get 12% more lateral force for a given slip angle, going from a 200 to a 300. Again compound has an effect.

Cheers

Greg Locock

SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources