×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

1996 IX Code change

1996 IX Code change

1996 IX Code change

(OP)
From what I am told, in 1996 some electrode mfg's went to the ASME code stating they could not meet the mechanical requirements for a E9018 and others could. So the code was changed stating that the E9018 can now be used and called an E8018.

Well, the electrode suppliers who were able to meet the code originally for the E9018 mechanical requirements renamed the product E8018, but state on the data sheet with the electrodes that it meets the SFA 5.5 and E9018 specifications.

What have others done who's old WPS's spec E9018 and the only welding rod, the E8018 (that meets the E9018 spec) is available? If some of you could let me know how you handled this issue, I would be very appreciative.

Metalhoosier

RE: 1996 IX Code change

You are referring to the L grade electrodes, and it was found during PWHT where the L grade could not meet the strength requirements of the original specification (ie.,
E 9018 B3L could not meet 90 Ksi after PWHT so it was down graded to E 8018 B3L.

We simply do not purchase Cr-Mo L grade welding electrodes.

RE: 1996 IX Code change

(OP)
metengr,

What type of covered electrode do you purchase then to take the place of the B3L? 9018-B3? If so, have you noticed any issues with cracking?

Metalhoo

RE: 1996 IX Code change

We purchase

E9018 B3
E8018 B2

We do not permit Cr-Mo L grade electrodes. No, we have had absolutely no issues with weld deposit cracking (low hydrogen lelctrodes and sufficient preheat) from the slightly higher carbon content. Keep in mind the L Grades are not permitted by B31.1 Piping Code because of the lower creep strength (lower carbon).

RE: 1996 IX Code change

metalhoosier
The L grades are commonly specified in the petrochemical industry where service is not at high temperatures (hydrogen or other service where weld hardness is required to be controlled). The 8018 B3L or 7018 B2L fillers more than meet the tensile requirements of P22 and P11 alloy steel pipe and can be safely used and are often specified for use by the Owners.  

   

RE: 1996 IX Code change

(OP)
Thank you both for the excellent info and background.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources