×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

(OP)
We are being asked to design micropiles to IBC 2006 code.

IBC 2006 Sect. 1808.2.7 requires that pile splices develop 50% of the pile capacity in bending.

We'd like to drill the low headroom micropiles utilizing male to female threaded casing.  Does anyone know of a resource or method of calculation to determine the bending capacity of a threaded casing splice?
 

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

The ADSC has a paper in their library on load tests performed on 7" micropile casing, but the section on bending wasn't very helpful because they didn't fail the unthreaded pipe section, so it's impossible to know how much threading reduced the capacity.

I've seen designs for soldier beams using threaded micropile pipe where the bending capacity was reduced anywhere from 35% to 65%, but I've never seen any data to back up those assumptions.

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

When questions like this have come up for me on repair of deteriorated piling on rail road bridges, we ran tests in the lab to determine the actual bending resistance.  Sure it is time consuming and takes some physical work, but you can't beat this for proving or not proving the strength is there.

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

(OP)
I agree that nothing beats an actual test.

One would think that others have tested the bending capcity of threaded casing and it might be possible to interpolate the data to the various casing sizes, so long as the material properties are known.

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

Just to take a step back, are you looking to use the casing for primary compression reinforcement, reinforcement for bending at the top, for confinement of the grout column for seismic, or for some or all of the above?

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

(OP)
The casing is the primary reinforcing for the micropile (no center bar).

The micropiles will be loaded in compression.  The only bending would be a result of accidental eccentricity.  I am told that the "building official" will not allow an exception to the above mentioned code requirement.

For this particular project, even though the magnitude of any potential bending may be negligible, we are required to provide a rational justification that the threaded casing is capable of developing 50% of the piles bending capacity at the splice.

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

Abstract from DFI:

Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference on Deep Foundations, 2007, Colorado Springs, CO, USA, (DFI)

Bending Strength of Threaded Micropile Connections
Steven R. Musselman; J. H. Long; N. Carroll; S. Farr

The bending strength and flexural stiffness of a micropile at its threaded connection is less than its intact strength and may fail due to thread slippage or by fracture through the pin (reduced cross-sectional area of male threads in the threaded zone of the casing). The mode of failure depends on the reduction in cross-section necessary for machining the threads, and details of the threaded connection such as the length of threaded connection, size and shape of threads, and the thread density (threads per inch). Based on data from bending tests conducted on 9-5/8 inch diameter micropile casing, a method has been developed to predict the ultimate moment capacity and initial bending stiffness of round threaded micropile connections. Two modes of failure were observed from four-point bending tests conducted at the University of Illinois on 9-5/8 inch casing with round threads. Threaded micropile casing connections with an effective thread length of 1.35 inches typically failed by slippage at the threads (jump out), while connections using an effective thread length of 1.89 inches failed by fracture of the pin. These two failure modes were described by W.O. Clinedinst in his report to the American Petroleum Institute on tension tests of threaded pipe casing. Clinedinst developed an empirical formula to determine the tensile strength of threaded connections. A method to predict moment capacity for threaded micropile connections by modeling the micropile cross-section and applying Clinedinst's equation to determine the max tensile stress along the threaded connection while satisfying force equilibrium is proposed. The predicted moment capacity for threaded connections using this approach is within ten percent of measured for both modes of failure observed from the bending tests.

That might be worth a look.

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

(OP)
Thanks for the suggestion.  I'll check it out in addition to the one born2drill suggested.

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

You may also want to check FHWA-SA-97-070 Micropile Design and Construction Guidelines Implementation Manual.  Most micropile threaded joints, if designed properly, should develop the full capacity of the pipe in compression.

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

(OP)
If there is something in FHWA-SA-97-070, it eludes me.  

I'm trying to quantify the capacity in bending, I'm not worried about compression.

Today the mailman delivered the paper that born2drill suggested.  They tested 7"x0.5" casing in bending.  It failed by thread jump. This particular casing failed at around 57% of the theoretical capacity of an unspliced casing section.  But since this is just one casing size with one thread pattern it might not represent typical performance.

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

Notionally for enough threaded length both sides of the joint can attain to be fully loaded, but the critical point is at the root of whichever the side, since there you have an open crack and a diminished section. So, as long as the threaded part passes enough stresses to feed the bending strength of the joint at the root, it is of no use to make the threaded part longer. For the exposed root this could be solved by external welding, but you always will have the internal for which no corrective action can be put in place. Hence, except for additional inner rebar otherwise not counted elsewhere, the only way to make pipe micropiles joints of the same bending strength than the shaft is by thicker externally reinforced joints.

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

(OP)
I have just recieved the paper suggested by Erdbau.  It is exactly what I was looking for.

I would recommend to others that are attempting to predict the bending capacity of flush threaded casing.

Thanks for the suggestion Erdbau!

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

I´m looking for different types of threads used for micropiles. Which ones are used?  Is there a way to get them? Is it all API?

Thanks!   

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

I'm not sure these ductile iron driven piles are being discussed here.  Drilled minipiles are typically API 5CT steel casing.  I've never read the spec, but there is probably a section on threads.  

Mrturran, do you want the casing itself or the thread spec?  You can get casing from several steel manufacturers.  It typically comes in two grades J55 and N80.  The number is the yield stress of the steel.  I have no idea what the letter means.

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

Erdbau,

Im looking for the threads only. Is there a standard used by pilers or do you take oil pipe threads or similar?

/Mrturran

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

The spec might have something about the threads.

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

Yes, but it would be great to know which one of them.  

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

As noted in an earlier post, API 5CT.

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

About % bending capacity. Why don´t pilers weld on stronger sleevs like the do on drill pipes?

I can´t see the point if you can only use 50 % of the pipes capacity.  

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

(OP)
The bending capacity doesn't usually control in micropile design.  In the micropile industry, we often assume that flush threaded casing has 50% of the theoretical capacity in bending at the threaded joint.  I was asked to "prove it" on a project, so I started this thread looking for help.

We don't use external couplers or welded joints because they cost more to install and we don't need the extra capacity.

 

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

Hi SEshore,

Ok, but do you need 100% in compression and/or tensile load?

By the way, I´m looking for a thread which is 100% in all three (Bend, tensile, compression). Do you know which types are used?

 

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

You can get 100% of coupler of cup details IF a closing weld is added to the externally apparent in-built ring crack. Other solution is a generalized weld within the coupler voids, very much alike as with couplers for reinforcement bars, to which, by the way, some of the micropiles used bear some similarity. Otherwise for tensile, for example, you are limited to the full strength at the net area of the threaded part.

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

(OP)
There is essentially no reduction in compression.  There is a reduction in tension.

If you are looking for full tension you might consider all thread bar as a component of your micropile.

If you need to get the casing to 100% in tension and you want avoid a lot of welding and reinforcing of the joint, you might consider using an external coupler rather than flush threaded casing.  With flush threaded casing you have male and female casing ends that thread together.  With an external coupler both ends of your casing will have male ends and your couplers will have female ends.  The drawback to external couplers for micropiles is that the couplers will have a larger diameter than your casing, so you will likely need to utilize an overreaming drilling system to drill a hole to accomodate the OD of your external couplers.

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

errata:
In the first line of my previous post the second of should be read OR

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

At a recent ASCE presentation I went to, the topic of welding N80 micropile casing to try and beef up lateral capacity was discussed.  The speaker identified this procedure as something to absolutely avoid doing.
Apparently welding has detrimental effects on the high yield steel, and welding will actually end up WEAKENING the steel at the joint.
I don't know if the same holds true for J55 pipe.

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

born2drill, that´s interesing. We normally work with YP around 460 mpa so I hope it does´nt effect us.

SEshore, Thanks. So the reason why you don´t weld on the construcion site is becouse it´s time consuming?

In Scandinavia we use Symmetrix drilling mostly. What type do you use?

Do you know what type or name of the external couplers that are being used?  

RE: Bending Capacity of Micropile Splice

Do you have any experiance about the differnce between seamless and welded pipes? I have heard that the seamless is stronger even though it has the same mechanical properties as the welded type.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources