Need help with Beam Calcs
Need help with Beam Calcs
(OP)
Hey guys, log time reader, first time posting.
I have a 50' long beam with 5 supports on a 12.5' spacing. (0ft,12.5ft,25ft,37.5ft, and 50ft)
The beam has a uniform 500lb/ft load; 25,000 lbs total.
I'm trying to find the greatest moment force to find the stress in order to select the size of beam. My issue is determining the reation loads. I assummed 5,000 lbs on each of the 5 supports???? but I'm lost at finding the shear and moment forces (Haven't done this in 12 years) I've got my Roark's Eq book and I'm going through the Three-Moment Eg but I can't get the numbers to add up.
Is there a simpler method I'm missing???
HELP!
I have a 50' long beam with 5 supports on a 12.5' spacing. (0ft,12.5ft,25ft,37.5ft, and 50ft)
The beam has a uniform 500lb/ft load; 25,000 lbs total.
I'm trying to find the greatest moment force to find the stress in order to select the size of beam. My issue is determining the reation loads. I assummed 5,000 lbs on each of the 5 supports???? but I'm lost at finding the shear and moment forces (Haven't done this in 12 years) I've got my Roark's Eq book and I'm going through the Three-Moment Eg but I can't get the numbers to add up.
Is there a simpler method I'm missing???
HELP!





RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
Try this calculator:-
http:
desertfox
RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
I hope you did not throw out your mechanics of materials books from college.
You have a statically indeterminate beam. You have to assume boundary condtions such as zero deflection at the reaction points, then solve for the integration constants.
RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
Now you have a fairly simple problem of uniform loading and two forces, one at the end and one in the middle of the 1/2 beam.
By superposition, you first find the deflections at those points absent those 2 forces, i.e. a uniformly loaded cantilevered beam giving y1 and y2 deflections. Now you place two forces, F1 and F2 at those points so that they cause deflections -y1 and -y2 at those points thus effectively putting the beam in the zero deflection state at those points.
Now you can write two equations, namely
-y1=a11F1+a12F2
-y2=a12F1+ a22F2
where you can get those influence coefficients a11,a12 and a22.
I got a11=1/3*L^3/EI, a22=1/24*L^3/EI, a12=5/48*L^3/EI
The rest should be obvious.
RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
I believe that Mc is not zero, only the slope there.
RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
Then, based on the information above, and multiplying the resultqang coefficients by the total span weight of 6.25 Kips, the approximate reactions would be:
2.81, 6.88, 6.88, 6.88, 2.81
The approximate max shear would be 6.88/2 = 3.44 Kips.
Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
Fe
RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
My apologies to all, my assumption that Mc was zero was incorrect as several people have pointed out.
Cajun please ignore my original file and use this one instead, I have gone right through it now and checked my answers against the calculator link I left earlier and they tally.
desertfox
RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
Support 1 - 2458 lb
Support 2 - 7136 lb
Support 3 - 5812 lb
Support 4 - 7136 lb
Support 5 - 2458 lb
Max.Moment is about 75,000 in-lb and occurs in sections 2 and 3.
RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
I tried splitting the beam and assuming that the moment was external at that point, but it didn't work for me when using the three moment equation and as several others have pointed out that you cannot assume that C is external moment(unless you know some other way).
I ended up doing the three moment equation and finding the unknowns by simultaneous equations which you can see in the file I uploaded.
The reactions compare very close with Ron's figures and also exactly match the figures from the calculator link I posted earlier so at least my maths appear to check out.
desertfox
RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
Look at the file I uploaded it gives the working out
desertfox
RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
This topic interested me as I solved a simpler version (two span, concentrated loads, symmetric) earlier by using superpostion: there's equations in an old textbook (Blodgett's) describing this that I walked through and thought I had a reasonable answer.
I wanted to see if the web program that desertfox posted gave the same answers as me but for some reason it doesn't... I was hoping that someone else can give me feedback; in my mind this should output symmetric loading over the three support points and the maximum moments located where the loads are. Actually to me it looks like the Shear and Moment Diagrams appear correct in the program but the values do not.
Attached is the output of the web calc as well as a quick sketch of the problem that I was trying to solve.
Thanks
http://fil
http:/
RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
It would be better if you had started a new thread on this however I'll take a look and let you know.
desertfox
RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
I think I agree with you, the calculator link seems to give different answers for beams with point loads when compared with hand calcs.
Altough it checked out fine when I did the UDL loading.
I checked the calculator with a text book problem for point load with two spans and the figures were out.
Any chance you can post your calcs so we can compare?
desertfox
RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
R1 = 0.393wl
R2 = 1.14wl
R3 = 0.928wl
R4 = 1.14wl
R5 = 0.393wl
Vmax = 0.607wl
Mmax = 0.107wl^2
Max. Deflection = (0.0065wl^4)/(EI)
www.PeirceEngineering.com
RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
Attached are my hand calculations... they're pretty straight forwad (although a bit messy) as I'm just using super-position and standardized formulas that I've found in a few different sources.
http://f
Here's a web page that outlines a bunch of common load cases: for my load case I used Figure 28: Continuous Beam- Two Equal Spans - Concentrated load at any point. As with everything Engineering related these formulas should be taken with a grain of salt and sound engineering judgement before assuming they are 100% correct.
http://www.awc.org/pdf/DA6-BeamFormulas.pdf
RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
Thanks for the information, I noticed the hand calculations have two spans with a load on each span but the load case 28 you directed me to is a two span beam but only as one point load on one of the spans, also the problem you posted was slightly different to the hand calcs you posted last, I was really after your hand calc you tried to compare with the online calculator.
Anyway I have played around and I can get the hand calc reactions off the formula sheet to be pretty close to the on line calculator results but the intermediate moment on the support seems way off.
Not sure at the moment whats wrong it might be me! I'll let you know.
desertfox
RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
I Have uploaded a file with a calc on the original beam you posted ie a two span beam with 25000lb load on each span using the three moment equation.
When I compare this with the online calculator it doesn't line up, now I then checked equilibrum ie vertical forces should cancel and they do on my hand calc but they don't on the online calculator.
See what you think and let me know.
desertfox
RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
Sorry about the last file I posted, that was for the actual problem I was solving and not the question I actually checked the program against, I've attached my calculations using superpostion of the formula 28.
http://f
It appears that we are both getting the same answers (done two different ways no less) and it seems that there is a problem with the online program. Now that it appears that I wasn't just making errors in my calculations I'll post a bug to the website and hope it will get fixed.
Thanks for helping me check my sanity ;)
RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
Your welcome and another reason why computor programs should be questioned and not just believed.
desertfox
RE: Need help with Beam Calcs
The only difference I got was a higher moment in sections 2 and 3 (beginning of section 2 and end of section 3). Moment was higher in the online program than either of the FEA analyses or the hand analysis using continuous beam approach.