×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Metal roof do not need roof conductor as lightning protection system?

Metal roof do not need roof conductor as lightning protection system?

Metal roof do not need roof conductor as lightning protection system?

(OP)
Hi mates,

need your advice on whethre is it possible to connect the down conductor to the metal roof directly and without installing any roof conductor.

because there are people having the idea that: metal roof could be the conductor which act as if air terminal and roof conductor. my understanding is that the metal roof is not good enough to carry the high ampere of lightning strike which could be penetrated and caused phisical damage on the metal roof sheet.

kindly enllighten me on this issue. even welcome shall there be any standards or theory/calculation that could clarify my doubt.

thanks.

loke

RE: Metal roof do not need roof conductor as lightning protection system?

See NFPA 780-2008. AFAIK, if air terminals are installed, you must run dedicated down conductors.  Whether or not any lighting protection is even required for a metal building is another matter and may be dependent on the building function and location in the world.   

The steel or aluminum roof is probably a reasonably good conductor, but you must also consider how this roof is bonded to the rest of the building and to earth.  I would expect significant side flash issues.  It's always good to remember that you're dealing with an arc that traveled maybe 30,000 feet through the air - so our attempts to control it often fail.  

 

 

RE: Metal roof do not need roof conductor as lightning protection system?

As dpc said you have to follow NFPA 780 Instructions. I don't have 2008 Edition but in 2004 edition you
could see:
4.6.1.2 Metal parts of a structure that are exposed to direct lightning flashes and that have a metal thickness of 4.8 mm ( in.) or greater shall require only connection to the lightning protection system.
4.6.1.3 Such connections shall provide a minimum of two paths to ground.
 

RE: Metal roof do not need roof conductor as lightning protection system?

A lightning strike to rods on roof or to roof itself still may cause structural damage and/or fire. Instead of a "direct" system, an "indirect" system is suggested. Overhead grounded wires ala electric power lines or adjacent free-standing metal masts may be a better option. In either case, protection of people and of sensitive electrcial/electronic equipments will NOT be obtained. For these you need to consider Surge Protection Devices and equipotential bonding/grounding. See more at: www.lightningsafety.com
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources