×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

effective length of elements in partial side-supported trusses
2

effective length of elements in partial side-supported trusses

effective length of elements in partial side-supported trusses

(OP)
Hi
It seems in planar trusses that side bracing of compressed chord is provided at all joints but tension chord is not restrained completely against lateral movement (side-supported at some joints), the effective length of diagonal and vertical elements for out-of-plane buckling in non-restrained  panels  is greater than L (K>1)!

Though the "K" factor can be calculated by analytical or numerical modeling of this kind of elements, I'm looking for any recommendation of codes or previous researches for effective length of diagonal and vertical elements in above mentioned trusses.
Can anybody give more information?
 

RE: effective length of elements in partial side-supported trusses

2
This has been covered before on this forum.  I'll look for the actual thread.  

Many on this forum, and in my office, do not agree on this subject.  I believe that this is more of a global buckling issue, and not a local buckling (buckling of a single diagonal) issue.  Here is why - If the bottom chord displaces sideways and the digaonal goes along for the ride, its own buckling length is still its own actual length.  You can think about this by imagining a vertical, slender pipe pin supported at its base with no lateral support at the top other than a cable that is slung over the top and attached to the ground on either side of the vertical pipe.  If you tension the pipe, it may become unstable and flop down and rest horizontally on the ground, but its own buckling length (kl) is stil its actual length.

In my opinion, the bigger concern is the global stability (the pipe flopping over).  

That being said, I've gone through a couple examples of energy calculations to check stability for such a case and have tentatively convinced myself that it's not a problem.  See the attached paper for the energy method stability check I used.

RE: effective length of elements in partial side-supported trusses

Structural EIT-
Isn't covered somewhere in the code that truss members may be taken to have k=1.0 for all members?
I'm brain farting here pretty bad....

RE: effective length of elements in partial side-supported trusses

I don't think so.  If it is and you find out where, please pass it along.

RE: effective length of elements in partial side-supported trusses

I must be thinking of pg 5-39 of the 89 code under "braced frames".
 

RE: effective length of elements in partial side-supported trusses

The importance of "bracing" the lower chords is associated more than anything with avoiding a "house of cards" failure with all the trusses rotating around their support points due to eccentrical application of the loads atop. This kind of failure everyone has slipped off the side of a rolling trunk or seen the japanese humour program here called "Yellow humor" with all those giant rolling cylinders know. For trusses hanging from points over the lower chord, at any situation where such eccentricity can't be forfeited, or where some lever arm of the same may make rotate the trusses on their supports, lower chord or transverse bracing or stabilization against rotation is warranted.

RE: effective length of elements in partial side-supported trusses

As ishvaaag said, the top and bottom chords need to be properly braced to prevent rotational failure.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

RE: effective length of elements in partial side-supported trusses

I agree with the top and bottom chords being braced to prevent a rotational failure, but I believe this is more related to the idea that beams need to be rotationally restrained, at a minimum, at the ends, and that this isn't a local stability issue for the diagonals.

RE: effective length of elements in partial side-supported trusses

I could be wrong, but I think you are all saying the same thing.  A compression member braced at one end only is in unstable equilibrium.  If the bottom chord is adequately braced, all of the compression members in the web have an effective length of their actual length, i.e. k = 1.0.

The King post shown in Fig. 11 of the Nair paper posted by SEIT requires a brace at the bottom of the king post.  Without it, the structure is unstable and will fail under load.  

BA

RE: effective length of elements in partial side-supported trusses

I just paraphrase the last sentence in last BAretired post and say, without (bottom bracing) the structure may lose, maybe, who knows, its structural depth upon rotation on the supports, and then a structure calculated with a proper K, could still fail.

RE: effective length of elements in partial side-supported trusses

(OP)
Thanks for your replies. according to the replies and introduced papers by SEIT, I concluded:

1- Effective length of diagonals for this kinds of trusses is L(K=1).
2-Minimum stiffens of side supports are required for above assumption.  
3-Diagonals can be designed as an ordinary column by formulas of AISC or other codes.

majmaz

 

RE: effective length of elements in partial side-supported trusses

In particular, steel joists without bottom chord extensions at the ends should be laterally braced at or near the crank point.

BA

RE: effective length of elements in partial side-supported trusses

I am too late to jump in on this thread. But read the commentary of the AISC 3rd edition manual (Page 16.1-189) suggesting that K=1 for truss members. I don't know why this has been removed in the 13th edition or I can't find it.

RE: effective length of elements in partial side-supported trusses

I have an old paper from the AISC indicating the importance of bottom chord bracing... ie, top chord bracing doesn't work well without it... I'll try to dig it up...

Dik

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources