×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Pipe elbows less than 90 degrees.

Pipe elbows less than 90 degrees.

Pipe elbows less than 90 degrees.

(OP)
Hello,

 I have a Crane's handbook here. I am looking for pressure drops across pipe elbows that are not 90 degrees in bend. Basically I am looking for a correlation between angle in bend and pressure drop. Page A-29 has something like that but only for Standard Elbows at 90 and 45 degrees.

  Thanks!

 

RE: Pipe elbows less than 90 degrees.

I am thinking that the correlation in the second figure from the bottom on the left hand side of Page A-29 can be used for bends of any angle, can it not?

And yet, if that was true, then how would one reconcile or treat the term "n" in that expression?  That's what escapes me...

Maybe a simpler approach is this:

I have data that suggests that the "L/D" ratio for a standard 90-degree elbow is 14, and the "L/D" ratio for a standard 45-degree elbow is 8.  At some point, after factoring in the appropriate centreline arclengths, extrapolation of the bend angle to zero would produce an "L/D" ratio for straight pipe of a length equal to the arclength of the fitting under consideration, and presumably, a line or curve through those data points would produce a correlation for equivalent lengths of bends of any angle between 90 and 0.

You could do the same for other ratios of bend radius to diameter with the knowledge that k = f*L/D.

 

Regards,

SNORGY.

RE: Pipe elbows less than 90 degrees.

(OP)
Hi SNORGY,

 Thank you for the prompt reply.

If we are looking at the same figure, second one from the bottom on the left of A-29. It reads that n= number of 90 degree bends. So I assume I cant use it for anything less than 90.

I will study what you wrote about extrapolating arclength. But I don't see how it will capture momentum loss due to direction change?

Thanks again.

RE: Pipe elbows less than 90 degrees.

dbecker, are there a lot of these non standard bends in your project that significantly add to the system losses?  Perhaps it does not make much difference regarding the loss coefficients if they only add up to a few percent of the system loss.  How accurate do you think your calculations will be and how much will the uncertainty in the non standard bends add?   

RE: Pipe elbows less than 90 degrees.

(OP)
Zapster good question.

  The system has 2 bends that are shallow that I can consider straight (less than 15 degrees). The rest of the system is coils.

Some of the bends are deep or close to 90 degrees (about 80 degrees). So in actuality, if I assume the aforementioned bends are either straight or 90 degrees, I should be ok.

If I have some correlation for non standard bends, I can compare 15 degree bends with straight pipe to know for sure what the difference is.

 

RE: Pipe elbows less than 90 degrees.

Is the formula you're questioning: KB=(n-1)(0.25π*fT*r/d +0.5K)+K?

where n=number of 90° bends and K = resistance coefficient for one 90° bend per table?

You can set n to zero and calculate a K value from the table based on the r/d value.

With n at 0, the formula becomes KB= K-(0.25π*fT*r/d +0.5K)

Patricia Lougheed

******

Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of the Eng-Tips Forums.

RE: Pipe elbows less than 90 degrees.

dbecker, "Handbook of Hydraulic Resistance" by I.E. Idelchik has a chapter, "Resistance To Flow With Changes Of The Stream Direction; Resistance Coefficients of Curved Segments -- Elbows, Bends, etc.

The above book should cover most of the info you are asking.  From your response, your main resistance might be the "curved segment" (coil).  As such, Idelchik might be a good reference.

RE: Pipe elbows less than 90 degrees.

Thanks vpl...

I wasn't sure that that would be legitimate.  Then I got sidetracked before I reviewed it in greater detail.  But yes, that is the equation in question.

Regards,

SNORGY.

RE: Pipe elbows less than 90 degrees.

The results of your calculations will be approximate at best.  For my money, it's not worth worrying about - use 45 for 45 or less and 90 for 45 to 90.  My opinion only.

RE: Pipe elbows less than 90 degrees.

I second the remarks of IFR.....

Correcting a piping system pressure drop calculation for elbows other than 90 degrees is not worth it....

Your calculation is only within 5-10% accuracy at best...

   

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources