×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

natural freq. for beam with non-uniform cross-section

natural freq. for beam with non-uniform cross-section

natural freq. for beam with non-uniform cross-section

(OP)
Hi,

I would like to model a cantilever beam in a program like MathCAD that I can modify quickly. It seems silly using FEA (Nastran) to model this type of system just to get the first few modes and mode shapes.

I have been able to do this for a simple uniform beam using the flexural matrix and mass matrix, obtaining the eigenvalues and eigenvectors. However, I am having a hard time figuring out the best way to tackle the non-uniform cantilever beam. The example I am working is a section of pipe, coupling, another section of pipe (diff. schedule), and a large mass at the free end. I need to model the details b/c the solution needs to be very accurate. PLEASE HELP!! Thanks in advance.

I have attached a schematic.    

RE: natural freq. for beam with non-uniform cross-section

Why is it silly to use FEA for such a problem?
In theory, a distributed parameter model would be the most accurate. Unless you are familiar with solving coupled PDE's then FEA is the easiest.
Although, if it were me, the first thing I would start with is lumping the pipe sections and then solve the lumped parameter system.
From here you can get a "feel".
Then move on to the PDE modeling.  

peace
Fe

RE: natural freq. for beam with non-uniform cross-section

also, depending on how that coupling is "stationed" and made of it potentially could male your results "way off" perse is not modeled.

peace
Fe

RE: natural freq. for beam with non-uniform cross-section

If you were programming from the ground up, it is numerically simpler to solve the problem by Holzer's method, or Mykelstahd/Prohl transfer matrix method.  I have programmed the latter in excel myself.

But if you already have an FEA program...

=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.

RE: natural freq. for beam with non-uniform cross-section

Agree, I'd use FEA to check my handcalc. Or vice versa.

Anyway, Rayleigh Ritz is another good approach for this sort of problem, it depends on whether you'd rather use iteration (Holzer) or differentiation(R-R).

Holzer is probably better suited to mathcad



 

Cheers

Greg Locock

SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources