×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

(OP)
PatentPro writes:

I believe that the era of the hybrid vehicle has arrived. Internal combustion engines always operate inefficiently under high loads near the engine's rated power: eg climbing hills, accelerating. But an electric motor, properly sized, can perform efficiently under these circumstances.

The Prius is a parallel drive system. The gasoline motor and electric motor can operate in parallel. The Volt is a series drive system: the internal combustion engine only sees the generator.

Who's right: Toyota or General Motors?

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

Your premise is wrong.  ICE operate at or near peak efficiency at high loads.  Turbo diesels in particular have optimum efficiency at full load.  Gas engines not quite peak because of fuel enrichment at WOT.  

Electric motors efficiency is not as load dependent as ICE but their energy source is quickly depleted at high loads.

Neither the Prius nor the Volt is intended to be operated at high loads, they both suck compared to ICE powertrain in terms of performance.

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

Who's right, "it depends".

If you accept that a fairly substantial amount of the energy being supplied to the vehicle is via the combustion engine rather than via an electrical plug, then you have to realize that if the combustion engine is going to be running anyhow, a gear-to-gear transmission is more efficient than an alternator, rectifier, battery, inverter, motor, and gear-to-gear drive. So for rolling down the highway, driven by the combustion engine, the parallel solution has the potential to be more efficient.

If you spend your time stuck in city traffic, then a solution that minimizes use of the combustion engine MAY be more efficient.

If you spend your time stuck in city traffic in the middle of a cold spell or a snowstorm, where's the interior heat going to come from? Most of them run the engine to achieve that. In a pure electric vehicle ... good luck with that.

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

The parallel provides greater operational flexibility. Also, the series requires a fully capable electric motor rather than a potentially smaller one that is not required to deliver peak motive power output. However, the parallel is more complex, and introduces the possibility of running the ICE at non-peak operating points (not required, but once you have the control option, how can you help yourself?)

If the application is readily amenable to all-electric with little help from the ICE, then the series solution can make sense. If the ICE contributes a large portion of the total motive energy, then the parallel is probably better (i.e. what BrianPetersen said).

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

parallel ones always won the student competitions.
 

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

Jsteve2- the max efficiency of the Prius engine is 38%. Its optimum delivery curve is above 30% for the entire power range. During a real test it isn't always on that curve, but it is sufficiently close to it for much of the time.

In comparison the Volt will run at around 5 different setpoints. I find it hard to believe that they'll be able to improve the efficiency at those 5 setpoints significantly more than if they just ran it along a curve.

I think Volt is an interesting experiment, but quite why they need to build an experiment as a production car is more to do with politics and marketing than engineering. However, for people who obsess about running costs, as opposed to total cost of ownership, and who drive less than 30 miles a day most days, it seems like a good move.

Cheers

Greg Locock

SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

GregLocock - since we're talking about specific vehicles, I think the Volt is built that way for one of two reasons (I have no inside knowledge on the matter). First reason, they may be trying to avoid the complex 3-headed monster transmission that Prius uses. The second reason is that they may be building the Volt as a precursor for a completely electric car, which cannot rely on an ICE for direct motive power, of course, so they have to take the ICE out of the motive loop. It may also just be politics or marketing, but I'm trying to give them the benefit of the doubt on that.

I agree with you that, almost all the time, the parallel gives you superior results from a total efficiency standpoint. In fact, it could always be at least equal depending on what your design goals were.

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

Quote: The Prius is a parallel drive system. The gasoline motor and electric motor can operate in parallel.
----------------------------------
The discussion might be a bit more on a sound base if your opening statement was a full statement of the Pruis system capability.

The Prius is a capable of a balance of both Parallel and Series operation, the mix of the two controlled by the power balance between MG1 and MG2.. and the use of a very simple, single planetary gearset that integrates the torque split.

If you take to time to find read the concept description in Toyota's patent of the HSD control algorithms you will get a good feel for how dynamic the control is and the use of parallel/series torque split to keep the overall system operating in at peak energy efficiency over a wide range of road conditions. The description is 92 pages long, the longest I've ever seen of any patent I've read.

Sorry don't have a link for it, but online patent data bases are quite easy to search.

DOE, Oak Ridge National Labs has also produced probably the most in depth, independent analysis of the details of the Prius HSD drive system here.. http://www.ornl.gov/~webworks/cppr/y2001/rpt/121813.pdf   

A complete read might serve as a good basis for further debate on the subject.  

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

DanEE,
The Prius is not a true series/parallel, in the sense that although the hardware is present, the controls NEVER run in true series mode (i.e. ICE charging, only the electric motor driving the wheels). When the ICE runs, among other things it is always driving the wheels if the wheels are moving. I've studied this thing closely, and I own one (and I love it).

As far as the benefits matrix, I largely agree except there is no reason why "series/parallel" is superior to "parallel" for continuous high output. As far as the Prius specifically (rather than a generic series/parallel), it is no different than the others for idling stop (as the ICE shuts down for this mode), it's only slightly superior for "energy recovery" (the only difference being the engine can charge and drive at the same time, giving one operating condition where the engine has more operating points available to it).

I assumed by idling stop they mean the coast to the stop, if what they mean is the stopped period itself, the series/parallel should score identically to the series (maybe even better if the presumably smaller ICE is more efficient - and they presume the ICE is smaller on series because they ding the series for continuous high output).

I'm not even sure what "high-efficiency operation control" means, except that maybe they mean things like through-the-wheel energy recovery can be a bit complex in a parallel configuration.

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

this might be the first time... but I think I'm inclined to agree with JSteve on this one.
 

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

JSteve, at the risk of being picky, reverse in the Prius is completely powered by MG2. If the ICE is used for generation with MG1 and the vehicle is in reverse you do indeed have series operation. We classify the Toyota, and Ford systems as full Series/Parallel hybrids.

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

@ Thecardoc:
That's fair, I have no quarrel with that. In most operating conditions, it's not significantly different than parallel, but as I said the hardware is present.

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

In the interest of inclusiveness, The GM Two-Mode system is full Series/Parallel as well.

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

One attribute that has been left out of the discussion to this point is that the Prius planetary gearset (sum and difference engines, as they were called and used as such in early analog "computers" in the 1800s) is used to provide CVT transmission function. Very simple mechanics, but complex computer code to control in a seamless manner.

A pure parallel must still have some type of conventional transmission adding weight and cost. The Honda which is pure parallel uses a CVT belt transmission.

Regarding parallel versus series, it is well established that even the best technology MG/Inverter/MGs can not match the power transfer efficiency of mechanical gearsets.

  

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

"it is well established that even the best technology MG/Inverter/MGs can not match the power transfer efficiency of mechanical gearsets. "

That's just a money problem. Best MG is 98.4% (and we could do better), best inverter is basically ((system voltage -1.2V)/system voltage), less a tiny bit, 99% is not unachievable. Admittedly even just a 5 kW system to those specs would cost > $20000 as it would be handbuilt.

Mechanical gears basically lose about 2% per pair, more if sliding takes place.


 

Cheers

Greg Locock

SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

... and a weight / inertia problem. All motors and generators that I know of that have such high efficiency ratings, have lots of copper, iron, and in some cases rare-earth metals in them relative to their power output. The efficiency may be good but the power/weight ratio is not, in these cases. I'm thinking of the AC traction motors used in locomotives here. In those, you want the locomotive to be heavy, to be able to pull the train. In a car ... not so much.

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

Agree. Tho I think worrying about the motor weight and ignoring battery weight is a bit odd!


I should have said 1% per gear pair I think in the previous note.




 

Cheers

Greg Locock

SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

The locomotive AC traction motors that I mentioned weigh something like 3 tons for around 1000 hp. Lots and lots and LOTS of iron and copper in those. Divide by 10 to get a car-engine-sized scale but with the same amount of iron and copper, and it's still 600 lbs, which would be a rather large percentage of the weight of the car or the battery!

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

Quote: parallel ones always won the student competitions.

At Formula Hybrid 2009, Texas A&M won with what was essentially a gas FSAE car that also had a minimal HV electric powertrain to meet rules. It dominated the competition because it was well-designed and well-tested. More broadly, of the cars that raced at FH09, almost all were parallel (probably 20 parallel, 5 or 6 series), and probably a similar ratio at earlier competitions.

Having parallel drivetrains helps with reliability, which is huge, but as student electric propulsion knowledge catches up and the competition fuel allocation gets cut further (-30% for 2010), I don't think parallel drivetrains will stay competitive.

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

Wutzu, unless the driving patterns of the Formula Hybrid test are designed to favor series operation ... I think the parallel drivetrains will be the ONLY ones that remain competitive.

Whenever the engine is running, its power is best used by going gear-to-gear to the wheels. It requires operating the engine somewhat off its absolute peak efficiency single operating point, but the loss by doing so is (in most cases) not as great as the loss of generating electricity, rectifying, storing, inverting it, and using it to power a motor.

If the test sequence takes start/stop and low-speed operation and extended periods of zero (stopped) to an extreme then MAYBE the series method MIGHT work out better.

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

BrianPeterson,

You raise great points. I

The competition, as I see it, is biased toward series hybrids. The big kickers are 5% of competition points for integration of gas and electric systems, and 7.5% of competition points for electric-only acceleration. If it weren't for these events and the hybrid-electric entry requirement, the winning car would be a 310cc turbodiesel, or a 250cc naturally aspirated gas engine.

The a mechanical transmission attached to an engine running at its max efficiency point is obviously the most efficient power option-assuming you keep the engine at that efficiency point. Since most of the events incorporate frequent acceleration/deceleration, I don't think the engine can be kept at that point.

A series hybrid isn't as efficient with its energy conversions since energy goes from the generator to an inverter to batteries to a controller to a motor. However, the generator can be much smaller, because its power requirements are buffered out by the batteries (think 2kW continuous instead of 20kW at peaks). The generator can also operate at its max efficiency point, which mitigates some of the energy conversion losses.

The biggest advantage that I see series hybrid having is that it can be built much lighter. A small generator driving batteries driving a motor is lighter weight than a large engine driving a transmission, but also hauling along the requisite motor and batteries/supercapacitors. Then add in the somewhat more complicated packaging issues of a parallel system and the resultant weight gain.  

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

The train motor is a bad comparison. The Cummins ISX 385 is a diesel engine weighing 1.5 tons, putting out 385 horsepower. That sounds like it would be terrible if it were scaled down to fit a Volkswagen TDI. But it's not, because it's not the same sort of engine. It puts out 385hp, but 1450lbf-ft of torque at 2k rpm. It's built for torque to haul large loads up hills.  

The reason the train's traction motor is so heavy is that it needs the copper and magnets to generate massive amounts of torque. The torque is proportional to the current through the motor coils, which is limited by the wire thickness. If we scaled that down to fit a car, it would only be good for tractors or people who drove slowly. But nobody does, they use smaller motors designed for less current (torque) but higher rpms, which comes out to more horsepower at the top end.

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

Show me a lightweight AC motor that achieves the 98.4% efficiency that someone else quoted. In every case that I know of, and by NO means do I claim to know every possibility, high motor/generator efficiency is achieved by using lots of iron and copper.

Certainly automotive-scale electric motors would be designed lighter than locomotive AC traction motors - at a cost of several points of efficiency. There is no choice but to do so. But ... if additional magnetic hysteresis and eddy current and other losses caused by using less iron and higher AC frequencies don't get you, windage and having to use additional gear reduction will.

Regarding that competition, a test for maximum electric-only acceleration does bias things towards having a big drive motor and high-current-capacity batteries and inverters. But that doesn't necessarily imply a series design. You can use a small combustion engine capable of being mechanically connected with power rating sized for cruising in the best efficiency range, and a big electric motor for acceleration. If that sounds familiar, it's not too different from how a Prius (or Honda Insight) is designed!

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

That's interesting. But A$12,000 for a motor kit? Ouch!

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

Three phase AC induction motors reach power density of 4kw/kg (2.4 hp/lb).  
See, e.g., AC Propulsion's 3phase/4 pole:
http://www.acpropulsion.com/products-drivesystem.html

High power density at high power levels is simply not common (yet), because high power is commonly used where mass is not a design driver (factory floor, locomotive).

I am unaware of any combustion engine design (perhaps something experimental?) that touches 4kw/kg, short of the gas turbine at 8kw/kg, and it appears high temperature super conductor electric motors will exceed even that.   

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

Brian - production version of that motor would have been around $500 10 years ago, there are a couple of good reasons to think it will suit certain niches, at much higher power ratings, but they have not been announced yet.

 

Cheers

Greg Locock

SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Hybrid vehicle: series or parallel drive. Which is better?

The big advantage I see with the Volt (and granted it's only one specific version of a series hybrid drivetrain) is that for the first 40 miles it's purely electric and therefore guaranteed more fuel efficient than the Prius.
I recall reading somewhere that the average daily commute was 30 miles in a day so for the average person (with 2.5 kids!) they may rarely have to fill up.

Of course that's fuel burned from the tank efficiency not fuel burned at the power station efficiency and that's assuming it was charged, the driver doesn't have a lead foot, etc.
Also a quick google search finds no solid info on how they plan to provide heat in the winter and how that will affect fuel use or range.   

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources