×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Surge control tanks and Surge anticipating valve

Surge control tanks and Surge anticipating valve

Surge control tanks and Surge anticipating valve

(OP)
I am working in water project to rehabilitate  water pumping stations  , the stations were built before 6 years , the discharge operating pressure is around 35 bar , the original design for the stations included surge anticipating valve (SAV) to absorb the surge waves during the power failure and the pump shutdown . After two years of operation, several failures for the booster pumps and the valves at the discharge side of the pumps were occurred, part of the failures causes were expected to be due to the inefficient method of absorbing the surge waves by using the surge anticipating valves (SAV) , the consultant is proposing to install surge tanks (ST) to fix this problem , However they will keep the surge anticipating valves installed .
My question is, in case we will have the surge tanks operating with the surge anticipating valves:

 1 - Is it recommended to have both systems (surge tank and surge anticipating valve) operating at the same time, and what is the disadvantages???

 2- Incase, both systems will work, is it better to set the surge anticipating valve to OPEN at the same time the surge tank is working so as to quicken the absorbing of the surge waves, OR to set the surge anticipating valves to open at higher pressure setting after the pressure setting of the surge tank to make the surge anticipating valves work as BACKUP system in case the surge tank doesn't work??

Thanks in advance for all your inputs ...
 

RE: Surge control tanks and Surge anticipating valve

Are you using pressure set valves relieving to the surge tank at a certain pressure setting, or a closed surge tank (no valves) with a minimum surcharge pressure held in the tank (kind of like an accumulator works)?

  

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25-50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities."-DOE statistic (Note: Make that 99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Surge control tanks and Surge anticipating valve

Have they done any simulations to support their remediating actions - or is it just gut feeling?

Best regards

Morten

RE: Surge control tanks and Surge anticipating valve

(OP)
Biginch ,

the surge tank that we will use is a bladder tank , that will be charged for a certain value of pressure.  

RE: Surge control tanks and Surge anticipating valve

That's what I thought.  In that case, the surge tank will be active all the time and the valves can be set to open at a given pressure, so the tank can't actually function as a "backup" to the valves, although the valves could function as a backup to the tank (in the classical sense).  I just don't know why you would want to have a valve (other than a relief valve on the tank) as a backup for a tank.  Anyway, the net effect is that both will be active at the beginning of the surge, assuming that the pressure rises very fast and immediately passes valve set pressure, you will have pressures over tank preset pressure (active tank) and valve set pressure (active valves).  Once pressure drops below valve set pressure, only the tank will be active again.  That IMO means the tank is functioning as the backup device.

Its not apparent why you would need both systems.  Either one should work, if designed and operated correctly.  What's more interesting is to find out exactly why the failures occured.  It sounds like nobody knows that yet.  Was it a design error, such as insufficient valve flow capacity, a valve malfunction due to incorrect setting, no maintenance, unexpected operating condition out of range, operator error, etc. and find a solution that addresses the problem as directly as possible.

If you are going to build the tank, I'd make it big enough to handle all surge flows without the help of any valves to handle the highest pressure ranges.

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25-50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities."-DOE statistic (Note: Make that 99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Surge control tanks and Surge anticipating valve

(OP)
BigInch,

Thanks alot.

RE: Surge control tanks and Surge anticipating valve

In my experience surge anticpating valves only work in the mind of the salesman. They are designed for one set of conditons and then another comes along and they fail.

I support BigInch here in that you should size the surge tanks for all scenarios where surge will occur and forget about the surge anticipation valves.

Make sure the consultant looks at al the scenarios for the "worst" cannot be determined until this is carried out.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources