Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...Your site has saved me hours of work that I cannot begin to express my satisfaction..."

Geography

Where in the world do Eng-Tips members come from?
fiapo (Industrial)
17 Oct 09 14:41
I am working in a fiber optic project, it is an outside plant trunking application and the fiber goes inside PEAD tube. Since there are areas which can be affected by floods, the fiber specifications preview loose tubes filled with gel. However, the contractor claimed that his supplier doesn't have available the fiber cable filled with gel and offered a core dry loose tube with water absorbent powder.  In the catalog it is informed that the cable is resistant to moisture , but once , as I wrote above the fiber optic cable will be installed in areas with frequent flood condition my doubt is if I can replace it for the cable proposed by the contractor with no further consequences.

 
IRstuff (Aerospace)
17 Oct 09 14:56
What exactly is your question?  Gel is certainly not the equivalent of absorbent powder.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

fiapo (Industrial)
18 Oct 09 7:14
My question is if I can replace the specified fiber which is core filled with gel by dry core filled with absorvent powder and still have the suitable protection considering application in flood areas.

Thanks  
IRstuff (Aerospace)
18 Oct 09 13:52
Isn't that a function of your requirements?  

How are you going to keep liquid water out of the cabling?

Do you really think that a powder will work as well as a gel?

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

fiapo (Industrial)
18 Oct 09 14:33
I still have doubt about the question. I wouldn't dare to deny the contractor request based on what I supose to be obvious, because I have already faced situations on which was apparent obvious was not what I think it was. On one hand the contractor has to follow the material specification, on the other hand I have responsibility on the project schedule, so I would like to have a clear and cute reason to either deny or accept based on a standard or something like. I have read that powder absorvent can be used instead of gel in some situations, even that it is superior, I am just asking here if it is also appropriate for flooded areas, where water will be present for long time during the year. So the question is: Are cables filled with powder absorvent materials  suitable to be used in such areas, if not, why ? Is there a reliable source to the answer ? Many Thanks .

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close