×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Doing my own testing

Doing my own testing

Doing my own testing

(OP)
I use lots of Simpson Strong-Tie products.  They are convenient connection devices.  I would like to use some of their parts in a non-conventional way, on code-conforming buildings.  Since they don't publish design data for the non-conventional manner in which I wish to use their parts, is there any reason I can't take the part that I'm interested in, mock up a real-life, full-scale assembly using that part, load it up and collect data (loads, deformation, etc), document my findings, and use that piece how I desire?  

Is that "sound engineering judgement" if I take any assembly that I've tested and apply a 2x - 3x factor of safety to it?  In my area, we don't need to provide code reports for the products we use.  Is there any risk in doing this if I'm conservative in my own "published design" values?  I'm strictly looking at some component and cladding connections at this point to give you an idea of the magnitude of my testing, but what if I was to do something more significant?  Is it "reckless" to do full-scale testing on my own and use my own values?

Just curious if any of the rest of you do this, or consider this our prerogative as engineers to use "sound engineering judgment."  Is there anyplace in the IBC to support this?  I did a search and couldn't come up with anything, but is anybody else aware of something like this?

Thanks.

RE: Doing my own testing

I think that you'd have to follow some type of procedure(s) like ASTM or ANSI, in order to be valid.  

RE: Doing my own testing

Sure you can do it - but then you own it and Simpson would always say it was not what they intended - if you should get sued.

Have I done it - sure - when I felt very confident of the outcome and the possible liability.

RE: Doing my own testing

You are free to do whatever you wish, but if you are wrong, the devil will visit your door.

BA

RE: Doing my own testing

Nice line BA... Quasi-religious, and quite poetic.  I like it very much.

YS

B.Eng (Carleton), P.Eng (Ontario), MIPENZ (Structural-New Zealand)
Working in Canada, and missing my adoptive New Zealand family... at least I brought the little Kiwi with me!

RE: Doing my own testing

You are in right path to find something wrong, other should avoid. That is the way I think all engineering would have reached, where we are today. It's upto you, want to play safe or risk it.

RE: Doing my own testing

As I am finding in engineering C.Y.A. in this case I believe this is valid advice.  

RE: Doing my own testing

(OP)
Thanks for all of your thoughts.

I was at a conference yesterday and asked a few people this question.  One thought that the code permitted a person to do their own testing.  So.....I'm searching through Chapter 16 and 17 of the IBC and I stumble into Section 1714.  It appears to me that if a test is "developed by a registered design profesional that simulates applicable loading and deformation conditions" then the load-bearing capacities can be determined and used.  There is a stipulation that there be a factor of safety of 2.5 on these tests.

Seems like that is a reasonable place to hang my hat, if like most of you have said that I'm comfortable with taking the risk.  Any other thoughts?

Thanks again!

RE: Doing my own testing

Aduances fortuna juvat...fortune favors the bold. Just remember beers are on you if you make it big.  

RE: Doing my own testing

Fortunately for PostFrameSE the Pub is digital. ;0)

B.Eng (Carleton), P.Eng (Ontario), MIPENZ (Structural-New Zealand)
Working in Canada, and missing my adoptive New Zealand family... at least I brought the little Kiwi with me!

RE: Doing my own testing

I have helped out with tests done by non-experimentalists and they have mostly been poorly designed.  (LOL, probably about the quality of a bldg design produced by a professor with no industry experience!)  If you don't have significant experimental experience, it might be smart to get an experimentalist to at least take a look at what you're planning to do.  Most professors would do this for little or nothing.

The only other issue I can see is that you're talking about proprietary products.  Like one of the other guys typed, imagine that a failure occurs.  Even a non-engineer might realize that the part was being used for something other than its intended design.  Even though you did tests, it wouldn't look good.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources