Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
(OP)
In the past when I-deas was still owned by SDRC people would use the terms SDRC or I-deas interchangebly to refer to the softaware. Sometimes both (SDRC I-deas). SDRC of course was aquired by EDS, but there are ads out there for jobs looking for people with SDRC expereince (where have these people been?). The last version, revision or whatever of I-deas was Master Series 12 (I think). Some in the industry are currently refering to I-deas as I-deas NX, not to be confuse with NX4, NX5, NX6 etc. which are really incarnations of the Unigraphics (UG) CAD application. Contrary to what some may have been lead to believe I-deas was not "merged" with Unigraphics to create NX. NX, imo, is basically UG with some functionallity from I-deas thrown in there.
I guess what I'm getting at is, what is the official name for the latest version or revision of I-deas? Siemens refers to I-deas as NX I-deas. What is the latest version of I-deas? I certainly hope it's not something like NX# I-deas because I know full and well that engineering managers who often are not end users of these apps could end up refering to I-deas as NX. NX is not I-deas! NX is UG and I-deas is I-deas!
Stop the madness!
John? Your input please!
I guess what I'm getting at is, what is the official name for the latest version or revision of I-deas? Siemens refers to I-deas as NX I-deas. What is the latest version of I-deas? I certainly hope it's not something like NX# I-deas because I know full and well that engineering managers who often are not end users of these apps could end up refering to I-deas as NX. NX is not I-deas! NX is UG and I-deas is I-deas!
Stop the madness!
John? Your input please!
The glass is operating at 50% capacity.





RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
I understand your frustration though. When NX first arrived on the scene, Unigraphics was supposed to be a thing of the past. Apparently not so, at least as far as managers are concerned. You will find more job postings for Unigraphics NX than you will for just NX.
"Good to know you got shoes to wear when you find the floor." - Robert Hunter
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
http:/
I guess the latest version of I-deas is NX I-deas 6. This could cause some confusion. Some managers may refer to I-deas as NX6 in a job posting which would turn way all the people they are looking for which I-deas users not UG users!
The glass is operating at 50% capacity.
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Design Solutions
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
http://www.siemens.com/plm
http://www.plmworld.org/museum/
To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
"Good to know you got shoes to wear when you find the floor." - Robert Hunter
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
Siemens is still maintaining an Ideas based product, Ideas NX.
Applicon and CALMA, to name 2, have been killed.
NX with the UG base is the path forward with the incorporated applicaations from Ideas MS and even some from Solid Edge.
The NX name did come about after EDS bought SDRC. In beta testing for the version after UG V18, it was initially referred to as V19, then changed to NX before the code was released. NX2 was the first version to have a number as part of the name.
"Wildfires are dangerous, hard to control, and economically catastrophic."
Ben Loosli
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
"Good to know you got shoes to wear when you find the floor." - Robert Hunter
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
NX is the only lead product now, there will not be any new I-deas seats going in anywhere.
I-Deas and Unigraphics have morphed in to NX (That's not really what happened but that's the gist). To put it another way, Unigraphics and I-deas have become as much one product as can be reasonably expected given different architecture/interface.
If you want mid range use Solid Edge.
As for managers and recruiters out there, NX is Unigraphics despite all the efforts of EDS/UGS/Siemens, having not got the message after eight years; I don't think they ever will.
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
"Good to know you got shoes to wear when you find the floor." - Robert Hunter
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
UG has a respectable name and history and I don't think all the name changes, especially the last one, are to the system's benefit.
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
29 years with the 'same company', 26 different business cards
John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Design Solutions
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
http://www.siemens.com/plm
http://www.plmworld.org/museum/
To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
Is MS still used? (as in NX I-deas MS12)
I've seen somewhere it being called NX I-deas 6. Pontentially confusing if you ask me.
I guess when recruiters ask me what's the latest version of I-deas that I've used, I'll just tell them "the latest". Like as if it makes a difference. I don't think I-deas has had any major changes since MS9.
The glass is operating at 50% capacity.
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
Unless it's been added in an NX6 update recently, NX has never had a true 3 faced blend. While Face Blend does have the capability, its uses are very limited (IMO) with most situations resulting in the user having to create a Face Blend with Tangent control curves & creating one half of the full blend at a time.
Tim Flater
Senior Designer
Enkei America, Inc.
www.enkei.com
Some people are like slinkies....they don't really have a purpose, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
I'm glad you brought that up.
I spent years modeling aerospace forgings in a mid range cam system that had a 3 fillet blend (in addition to a 3 face blend) that I found indispensable. When I moved up to UG I expected to find that and more. Of course there is more. But I've searched in vain for something comparable in terms of power and ease of use. Attached is what I've had to live with.
It's a corner with 3 different size fillets intersecting. It's clearly not a blend; it simply takes the smallest fillet and wraps it around the corner. I've worked face blend and "transition" but they're not dedicated fillet blends.
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
Let's try that again
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
I hope we're not getting our wires crossed here. I am talking about a 3 FACE Blend or Tri-Tangent Blend, where a full radius is created between 3 separate non-blended faces.
Refer to your original image, which I have marked up and reattached. See that rib that is circled in blue? You have 2 separate Edge or Face blends applied there (one on each side that is no larger than half of the width of the rib) which results in the 2 edges on the top face. A 3 Faced Blend would make a FULL radius over the top of the rib and the highest point of the result blend would be tangent to the top face. The top face would be trimmed away completely in the end. Basically, the cross section of the blend would be somewhat like an upside down U shape.
Regarding your example with the 3 blend running together, that's a case where you may wish to use a Styled Corner, which is actually tangent to 4 faces (3 blend faces and 1 non-blend face - like a ball corner). Styled Corner is only available if you have a Shape Studio licence though and it results in a surface that you'd probably have to Patch into the solid, unless you're creating surfaces then Sewing.
I hope all of that makes some sense and better explains what I was trying to convey earlier.
Tim Flater
Senior Designer
Enkei America, Inc.
www.enkei.com
Some people are like slinkies....they don't really have a purpose, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
Tim Flater
Senior Designer
Enkei America, Inc.
www.enkei.com
Some people are like slinkies....they don't really have a purpose, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
However I had in mind SDETERS "Three surface fillet" which I interpreted as a three fillet corner blend. Nevertheless I appreciate your help. Maybe you could take a look at the attached jpg and tell me how I might best achieve this.
BTW I don't have a shape studio lic. And if the solution is a surface, that's fine. Also, I handled that rib with 2 blends because in my old system I would get an error if a blend completely removed a face. I now know that's not a problem with UG. Thanks again for the help.
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
Raysapp I could tell you how to get what you show in your JPEG in I-Deas (using simple fillet tool By selecting the Vertex point of all three edges), but in UGNX I have no Idea.
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
The corner setback blend is available in NX as standard and has been for some time. See the attached image. You can manage to create a fairly comprehensive array of softened corners using the technique.
Best Regards
Hudson
www.jamb.com.au
Nil Desperandum illegitimi non carborundum
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
I know you can create a three surface blend of sorts under face blending, but it is somewhat limited compared with what I've seen elsewhere.
While we're on the topic of blending and comparing different CAD systems, (which is to say right off the beaten path of the original post), I have attached an image of something which vexes me. What you're looking at is 100mm cube hollowed to 20mm with a 40mm radius in the corner and a single line projected onto the surface. That line has been used as a tangency control in the construction of the face blend. My beef is that the ends of individual blend faces don't remain tangent to one another as you can see. In this simple example the error was up to 2.7 degrees.
This does not just happen for curve tangent blends but for several kinds of conical offset blends as well regardless of how much trouble you go to in making the curves continuous.
raysapp mentioned occasions when you need to surface the occasional face to get a good result, and this is often one of them for me. The bugbear is that surfacing to these low degree arc sectioned adjacent blends is actually more difficult to pull off than when you've a b-surface to work to. Frankly if the system would just work as one might expect in these situations I'd really appreciate it!
Best Regards
Hudson
www.jamb.com.au
Nil Desperandum illegitimi non carborundum
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
Thanks. That's exactly what I was looking for. Can't believe it was there in edge blend the whole time.
Ray S
NX 7.0
www.appliedprecisionproducts.com
RE: Proprer nomencalture when refering to I-deas
John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Design Solutions
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
http://www.siemens.com/plm
http://www.plmworld.org/museum/
To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.