×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

pile or not
5

pile or not

pile or not

(OP)
We are planning to built a compact wastewater treatment building with a wide spread foundation extended over a 100m x 40m rectangular area. All process tanks are concrete. The depth of building below grade will be 2.5m. The total weight of the building is approximately 20000 tons.

We first wanted to see what would be the pile carrying capacities are and tried to drive 400x400 square 12m long concrete piles... However the piles could not be driven more than 5 meters.

What would you be your thoughts?
Forget about piles and make a compacted bed and build the structure on top of it?

Attached is the borehole profile. We had 8 boreholes and all are the same.
 

RE: pile or not

nothing attached

Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in mud. After a while you realize that them like it

RE: pile or not

2
Your loads are quite heavy.  200,000 tonnes spread over 4000 m2 is approximately 500 kPa (490).  My first question in reviewing your borehole log - Who logged it?  A geotechnical engineer or a geologist?  Other than the first layer where it is noted to be medium dense, we have no data on the consistency of the clayey layer - you seem to have "rock" above the marl?  Geologically is this correct in your area?

We do not have the standard penetration test "N" values for the silty sand; we do not have the undrained shear strengths of the clayey materials - or RQD values, etc. for the gypsiferous rock (doesn't really sound like rock from the descriptions).  We would want to know the overconsolidation history of the soil.  If the layers below 6.8 m are all overconsolidated by more than 500 kPa, then a mat foundation would likely be the way to go (with that overconsolidation, the shear strength should be sufficient).
If not, and likely not, a detailed study would be needed - AND IT IS MOST DEFINITELY NEEDED NOW.  Do yourself a service and hire an experienced geotechnical engineer in your location and have him do a proper geotechnical investigation, obtain the proper soil properties for modeling the site and propose/recommend the most suitable foundation system for your structure(s).   

RE: pile or not

20000 BigH, weary eyes sometimes at night; yet always good advice.

RE: pile or not

What BigH said!

RE: pile or not

BigH's advice about getting a local geotechnical engineer to assist is appropriate.  But 50 kPa (per ishvaaag's errata) is not much, so a mat should work.  Be sure to allow for hydrostatic uplift.

RE: pile or not

blush - when they don't put in the commas, my eyes do go batty.  50 kPa is prety light - and I would use a mat. No need for piles - but on a job your size - you need the geotech to lead you right.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources