×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Calculix: beam element actually a 3D solid?

Calculix: beam element actually a 3D solid?

Calculix: beam element actually a 3D solid?

(OP)
Hello,

as far as I know, (and the CalculiX manual seems to support it) the B32 element in CalculiX FE library actually is a 20-node 3D solid.

To my understanding (and as have been in FE software I've used before), a 'true' 1D beam element in FEA has a precise analytic solution, while solids haven't.

To those of you that have got any experience with CalculiX, did this feature ever lead to any real problems with results precision?

Thanks and regards,
Alex.

Alex Bausk
Structural engineer
http://bausk.wordpress.com

RE: Calculix: beam element actually a 3D solid?

I can only suggest you run a few single elements model to check. I'd be very pleased to see a good beam element in calculix.

If you look back on their yahoo group you'll see some test cases I ran demonstrating why a beam element could not be approximated at the time by the existing elements in their library.

 

Cheers

Greg Locock

SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Calculix: beam element actually a 3D solid?

(OP)
Greg,

thanks for your input.
I found the discussion you've mentioned on Yahoo groups, as well as some pdfs. One of my first thoughts was, too, possible problems with the torsional behavior of a beam.

I wonder if anyone has actually made any further study or developed any workarounds for this problem since that thread, which is 3 years old by now.
Maybe I'll come up with some ideas when I'm done studying the subject. CalculiX is too much fun to let it be spoiled that easily.

Regards

Alex Bausk
Structural engineer
http://bausk.wordpress.com

RE: Calculix: beam element actually a 3D solid?

I know CalculiX uses the 20 node brick for it's shell elements. You have to turn on body visualization to see stresses on top and bottom surfaces when you use their shells.

There is nothing to stop you from writing your own beam element. smile

TOP
CSWP, BSSE
www.engtran.com  www.niswug.org

"Node news is good news."

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources