×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

CONCRETE STRENGTH

CONCRETE STRENGTH

CONCRETE STRENGTH

(OP)
This is a new one on me.  Recently I was told that it had been stated at a seminar that concrete cylinder break strengths which were significantly higher than the design strength could indicate some kind of deficiency in the completed structure.

Certainly I can see that the "deficiency" could be that the concrete producer was losing profit in supplying material which is more expensive than specified, or necessary, but I'm stumped to come up with any reason why the designer should be concerned.  Am I missing something?

RE: CONCRETE STRENGTH

Very strange.  You could certainly make this argument in a seismic environment, where your overstrengths dictate plastic hinge formation (to some extent, less than steel), however otherwise I'm going to be interested to see any justification(s) for typical construction.

What about admixtures?  I know sodium chloride is an effective plasticizer and contributes to higher early strengths;  It's just TERRIBLE for the rebar.

YS

B.Eng (Carleton), P.Eng (Ontario), MIPENZ (Structural-New Zealand)
Working in Canada, and missing my adoptive New Zealand family... at least I brought the little Kiwi with me!

RE: CONCRETE STRENGTH

I imagine this may have something to do with seismic design. Specifically, it may reduce ductility where it is required.

In California, concrete producers have a minimum and a maximum value of f'c that they can deliver to the job site precisely because of this reason.

RE: CONCRETE STRENGTH

Should have read YS's post before I posted..  

RE: CONCRETE STRENGTH

Higher strength concrete is more brittle and less ductile. It is, however, higher strength... It behaves plastically a little better... but brittle none the less.

Dik

RE: CONCRETE STRENGTH

ALN3 -

What are the cylinder strengths you are referring to? - Ones submitted with a proposed mix design or samples from the job site.

If you are looking at submittals for the mix design, look at the testing data. Unless it is a unique project, a special, time consuming set of samples is usually not supplied and older test for the same mix with the same materials are taken from testing files.

For normal jobs, the savings in material substitution is not worth the extra problems since the common admixtures are so cheap when bought by the tank or truckload and dosed automatically.

If you are worried, you can request a lower strength that is closer to the design strength.

As usually, the delivery cost is still one of the two most important costs of a delivered yard of concrete.

If you are concerned with the performance of the completed structure, core samples could be an indicator, but they are often higher than the cylinder breaks, but could indicate placement or curing problems during construction.

RE: CONCRETE STRENGTH

Overstrength conditions can affect moment distribution and certainly affect strain compatibility.  In general it is not a big deal unless the difference is significant and presents ductility issues as noted by others.

RE: CONCRETE STRENGTH

"It behaves plastically a little better... but brittle none the less.", didn't come out right... the lower strength concrete behaves more plastically...
 

RE: CONCRETE STRENGTH

The statement may have been broader than related to seismic ductility.  It is possible that it referred to an issue which was discussed here in great length recently, namely the minimum steel requirements for flexural elements.  For beams, codes have alway prescribed a minimum reinforcing percentage in order to ensure that the reinforced section is strong enough to prevent sudden failure after flexural cracking.  With higher strength concretes and the same steel ratio, the cracking moment increases without a corresponding increase in the ultimate strength.  The high strength concretes which would cause this anomaly are not efficiently used in beams, but rather are normally found in columns, so I doubt the concern is valid.   

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources