×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Occupancy Classfication for pellet storage

Occupancy Classfication for pellet storage

Occupancy Classfication for pellet storage

(OP)
I am back reviewing the occupancy classification of a building that will store bulk wood pellets. Pellets will  be loaded to trucks, but the main purpose of the building (and a great part of its area), is for storage.

I see as a first and obvious possibility of classification, Group S-1, which allows storage of combustible materials (examples in code are bamboos and rattan, lumber, books, furniture, grains).
 
But per code, to classify an area a storage, it should not be a hazardous occupancy, and here is where I found this unclear:

1. High hazard group H-3 applies to building containing materials that "readily support combustion" so, how do you interpret the concept of "readily".  Books, rattan, lumber, etc are combustible as are the wood pellets. Even more, pellets are same material as lumber (other shape only) so am I right in saying that H-3 group should not apply to my case? I have no clarity in where to draw the line between combustible and readily combustible.  

2. High hazard group H-2 applies to buildings containing materials that pose a deflagration hazard or hazard for accelerated burning, and includes "combustible dusts". Storing wood pellets  will certainly "produce" some dust (as will storing grains and lumber) but the code accepts storing grains and lumber as S-1 occupancy. So, I understand that for the code, the single "presence" of dust is not enough to have an H-2 occupancy. Is it the correct interpretation of the code that the "material" been stored has to be dust in order to trigger this H-2 occupancy? If not, how can we discriminate between an S-1 occupancy with dust and and H-2 occupancy?

I'll appreciate very much any input on these questions.
 

RE: Occupancy Classfication for pellet storage

(OP)
I forgot to mention I am using IBC 2006

RE: Occupancy Classfication for pellet storage

If you look at International Fire Code Section 2701.2.2, you will see that wood is neither a physical hazard or health hazard material. Because wood is not a hazardous material, you do not need to apply the requirements in Table 307.1(1) for maximum allowable quantities for hazardous materials.

As to wood producing combustible dusts, the literal interpretation is the mere presence of dust could require a Group H-2 occupancy. Fortunately, most code officials are reasonable because this is not the intent. The intent of the H-2 occupancy classification for combustible dusts is when the process presents a deflagration.

Criteria is available in NFPA 664 for empirically determining when a dust deflagration exists. Attached is an article I wrote on the subject a few years ago that explains the proper use of the NFPA standards.

RE: Occupancy Classfication for pellet storage

(OP)
Thanks for the information: the article is excellent and addresses the exact same doubts that the code gave me. So, is it correct to say that my classification is not H-3 and can be S-1 unless the amount of dust (and other factors in the deflagration pentagon) is such that can constitute a risk of deflagration, in which case it would be and H-2 occupancy?

 

RE: Occupancy Classfication for pellet storage

You're correct. If you don't have a deflagration hazard it is incorrect to assign the building a Group H-2 occupancy classification.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources