×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Convert pipe size to multiple smaller pipes

Convert pipe size to multiple smaller pipes

Convert pipe size to multiple smaller pipes

(OP)
I am bidding a project that will require a low water truck crossing( Peak data= 500CFS and 7F/S V) I calculate a 108" ID pipe will handle the flows but I need to use multiple smaller pipes (say 36") in order to keep the crossing accessible to trucks.  The length will of pipe will be 30' and I will likely be using steel casing. I will have this fully engineered if we get the job but I am trying to deide how much money to put into this item.

RE: Convert pipe size to multiple smaller pipes

In this case I think it may take a lot of them!  [See e.g. per the footnote to the table "Equivalent Number of Pipelines" at http://www.acipco.com/adip/products/Sect17.pdf , i.e. it roughly takes about as many smaller pipes as the ratio of larger to smaller diameters raised to the 2.63 power.]  

RE: Convert pipe size to multiple smaller pipes

[The rough rule I threw out is for all full flowing pipelines, which I realize this might not necessarily be.]

RE: Convert pipe size to multiple smaller pipes

(OP)
I too came up with 10 pipes and thought I would add a factor of 25% for friction but started to doubt that would be enough

RE: Convert pipe size to multiple smaller pipes

I occurs to me that the comparison criteria you should use here may be pressure drop (or head loss) rather than flow area.

Maybe calculate the pressure drop across the large diameter line, set that as your max allowable, and then back calculate how many small lines are needed to stay under that value (I would also toss on a 5 to 10% margin for good measure).

Just my two cents worth, I am by no means an expert.

RE: Convert pipe size to multiple smaller pipes

Its not proportional to velocity because the object is to have at least an equivalent head loss to prevent any additonal buildup of head upstream that might cause run over the top of the roadway.

The rough answer is <about> .. yes ... twentysix (26) pipes of 36" diameter, flowing full, so an increase in the number is needed again, if not flowing full.  PS that's 36" I.D.

Basically why a lot of culverts are big diameters.
 

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25-50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities."-DOE statistic (Note: Make that 99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Convert pipe size to multiple smaller pipes

without knowing the slope or tailwater conditions, it could be 10 or 30 pipes. you need more information to solve this puzzle

RE: Convert pipe size to multiple smaller pipes

I just assumed the same minimal slope in both diameters.  For cost estimates, its safer to use 30 until the detail engineering is done.

**********************
"Pumping accounts for 20% of the world's energy used by electric motors and 25-50% of the total electrical energy usage in certain industrial facilities."-DOE statistic (Note: Make that 99% for pipeline companies) http://virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com/

RE: Convert pipe size to multiple smaller pipes

At a certain point (maybe 15 pipes ??) it will become more economical to "raise" the truck grade (by, perhaps, 12 to 15" so that the number of pipes (greater length of culvert, greater expense, greater construction time and delays, simple available space in the ditch) becomes less.  

So, analyze 30x pipes at 36"  ?  

10x pipes (in the middle) at 48" plus 5x each side at 36"  ?

4x pipes in the middle at 72", plus 2x each side at 48" plus 2x more at the far ends at 36" = this would let the "middle of the sloped (?) ditch to be deepest at the center, with additional capacity as more flow is needed as the water gets wider in the "vee" shaped ditch.   But the total height of the ditch + culvert is still substantially less than the original 108" pipe.   

RE: Convert pipe size to multiple smaller pipes

Look at some box culverts.  

Richard A. Cornelius, P.E.
WWW.amlinereast.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources