×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Curve Number (CN) for "Mulch"
2

Curve Number (CN) for "Mulch"

Curve Number (CN) for "Mulch"

(OP)
I have to show the increase in runoff for timber harvesting a small patch of woods for a client in Atlanta, GA. We are felling the trees and grinding the stumps. We chose not to grub to preserve the integrity of the soil as much as possible, and to not trigger as many erosion control requirements.  

The County is requesting to see the increase in runoff due to the change in land use. I'm using the SCS (CN) Method and a 55 for pre-developed conditions (woods, good condition, HSG "B") but I'm struggling to come up with a good post-developed land use.

We use the National Engineering Handbook for CN determination but nothing seems to apply very appropriately.

Any thoughts??

Thanks,
Dave Skurky, P.E.
 

RE: Curve Number (CN) for "Mulch"

the land will probably most closely resemble one of the following categories in table 9-1:

woods (poor condition) if you plant new trees or

pasture, meadow or brush if you don't replant

 

RE: Curve Number (CN) for "Mulch"

For the condition after the timber harvest, how about "Fallow - Crop residue cover (CR)" (good CN = 83 for HSG B)?

What is ultimately going to be done with the land?  Is there any kind of construction to occur?  If not, some kind of vegetation will establish.  Will it be cut and maintained as an open area? or will it revert back to woods?

RE: Curve Number (CN) for "Mulch"

The curve numbers are for agricultural lands. Thus fallow is for a farm field which has been cultivated in the past and is currently not planted. It would assume there has been furrows created by the plow and cultivator. Unless there has been some terracing done in your forst plot, I don't believe this is a realistic curve number.

RE: Curve Number (CN) for "Mulch"

Have you considered measuring it on a sample plot of ground ?

RE: Curve Number (CN) for "Mulch"

cvg,

I am aware that fallow is for idle agricultural lands between crops. I still believe a freshly cut woods with stumps ground out and mulch residue is probably much closer to the fallow condition (good CN 83) than poor woods (CN 66).  I believe the lower CN is the unrealistice curve number at this stage.

I would agree with the poor woods or pasture conditions for an ultimate land cover (vs immediately after harvest), which is why I asked the follow up questions.

RE: Curve Number (CN) for "Mulch"

well, if we are talking about "immediately" after harvest I agree with you. But I have to assume that there are some bmp's in place which likely include seeding with grass and possibly re-planting trees. Even without these, the grass will grow in within one season. This will approach "meadow or pasture" conditions very quickly.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources