×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Snow depth calculation in metric in ASCE 7-05

Snow depth calculation in metric in ASCE 7-05

Snow depth calculation in metric in ASCE 7-05

(OP)
In ASCE 7-05 Section 7.7.1, at the bottom, it says to determine the snow depth (h.b) by dividing the snow load (p.s) by the snow density (gamma). This is all fine and good, makes perfect sense. But then in parentheses there is this note: "In SI: also multiply by 102 to get the depth in m.)

This doesn't make any sense to me, as determining depth by dividing pressure by density is not an empirical formula, and shouldn't need any "coefficients" to correct for different units systems. If I'm in SI, I have density in N/m^3, and I have load/pressure in N/m^2, so pressure/density should give me the depth in meters without multiplying by any special number. What am I missing here? (I thought that maybe the note is assuming that you are going to try to divide psf by N/m^3, but I did the math to see what the conversion factor would be in that situation and it's not 102.)

RE: Snow depth calculation in metric in ASCE 7-05

(OP)
Well, I figured it out. The 102 factor should not be in the ASCE 7-05. I looked at the ASCE 7-95 to compare, and in the 95, they define gamma as kg/m^3 for SI. When you convert kg to kN, you have to multiply by 102 (which is (1000 kN/N)/9.8m/s^2). So the conversion factor is correct in the ASCE 7-95. In the ASCE 7-05, however, they've changed the definiton of density for SI to kN/m^2, so the conversion factor is no longer needed. They just failed to remove it from the code. So now I've got a new question: what's the best way to go about contacting ASCE or SEI with a correction for the code, so they can fix it for the next version?

RE: Snow depth calculation in metric in ASCE 7-05

you need to research the "errata" for the code. Might have already been addressed...in my book there is a heavy black vertical bar next to that note.
They usually dont just remove mistakes from books or codes...they note them and reference some sort of errata.  

RE: Snow depth calculation in metric in ASCE 7-05

(OP)
I don't think the black bar means that it's been addressed in an errata. My understanding is that the black bar means the section has been changed since the last code. In the ASCE 7-02, that sentence says "p.f (or p.s)", while in the ASCE 7-05, that sentence says "p.s". I think that is the change being referred to with the bar. I looked at all the errata I could find for the ASCE 7-05 and didn't see this change.

Also, I found a link on the SEI website to a form called "Proposal to Revise the 2005 Edition of ASCE 7": http://content.seinstitute.org/word/proposal_form_asce_7-05.doc I'm going to send that in and cross my fingers.

RE: Snow depth calculation in metric in ASCE 7-05

You might be the first person to ever calculate snow loads in metric!!!
I kid.
 

RE: Snow depth calculation in metric in ASCE 7-05

"pf" should definitely be in there also...might want to mention that.
If you were only working with flat roofs, you'd never calculate "ps".  

RE: Snow depth calculation in metric in ASCE 7-05

i retract my last posting.  

RE: Snow depth calculation in metric in ASCE 7-05

(OP)
I'm not surprised this has slipped through the cracks for so long, cause I really MIGHT be the first person to calculate snow loads in metric (using the ASCE 7 anyway)!

I'll consider adding the thing about pf/ps, it is really strange that they removed pf from the 05.

RE: Snow depth calculation in metric in ASCE 7-05

(OP)
Wait, why do you retract your last post? It makes sense to me that they should include both p.s and p.f in that sentence.

RE: Snow depth calculation in metric in ASCE 7-05

(OP)
Well, I suppose if you say "p.f or p.s", it could confuse people with sloped roofs, because they would have calculated values for both p.f and p.s and they wouldn't necessarily match. So to eliminate confusion, even if you just have a flat roof, the new sentence is telling you to go ahead and calculate p.s (which would, of course, equal p.f) for this equation. Got it.

RE: Snow depth calculation in metric in ASCE 7-05

my sentiments exactly.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources