Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
(OP)
Anyone with large water retaining concrete tank design experience, is it good practice to have 30ft high walls, between 150 and 300 ft long without movement joints. According to ACI 350, without movement joints the reinforcement ratio should be at least 0.005. If this requirement is met, is it OK to omit movement joints for water retaining structures. What are your thoughts.






RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
Expansion joints are a pain to locate and likely to leak, but they're better than the alternative.
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
The Expansion having a gap of about 1" filled solid, and with backer bar and joint sealant each face.
A Contraction joint with reinf stopped, smooth bar, greased one end.
Stop reinf and dumbbell-type waterstops at each of course. What are you thoughts.
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
I'd place construction joints at 30 ft, pour the walls and slabs in an alternating pattern and save the expansion joints for 100 to 200 ft. spacing.
I know that other outfits use contraction joints and don't have any issues. And we use them in very specific cases. But any joint without reinforcing crossing the joint is risky and the less of these you use, the better.
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
JedClampett,
I plan to use one expansion joint. Is it OK to have an expansion joint in the wall and just a construction joint in the 30 mat foundation at the same location. I've never seen a mat foundation with an expansion joint.
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
I used to believe as you do, but I have seen concrete expand considerably in the hot sun. In one instance about 15 years ago, a concrete pavement between a building and a roadway buckled up on a hot day. The pavement actually lifted off the ground and failed in compression. After the failure, the slab was so uneven that you could not easily walk over the surface. I was amazed because I had never seen anything like this before. I guess this is why folks put expansion joints in sidewalks.
BA
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
But this discussion is about a water tank. I wouldn't think that expansion would be an issue there, unless the water is heated.
As to pavements, I agree that they expand in the sun. But expansion joints don't really help with that longterm unless they are properly maintained. If left on their own, they deteriorate, fill up with debris, and grow as seasonal temperature variation allows for the joints to collect more debris and widen.
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
Why mention expansion joints, only because ACI lists expansion and contraction joints as movements joints. ACI 350 recommends movement joints in water retaining structures. I have a 30ft high retaining/tank wall that will be 292ft long. One of ACI codes recommends expansion joints in walls more than 150ft long.
I've never seen a subject in structural engineering where opinions vary so much for such an important matter. I can see how the spacing of joints can be hard to pin down, but I can't determine when to use an expansion and/or contraction joint. Or just use construction joints.
I like how the codes are vague enough to mention each type of joint for each application, walls, slabs, etc, but they do not specify when to use them.
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
I currently plan to use construction joints in the slab at 40ft oc. One expansion joint in the long walls at mid length, 146', and contraction joints in the wall at 40 ft oc. No expansion joint in the slab. Still not sure if I want to stop the reinf at the contraction joints, leaning toward not doing so, which will make them construction joints at 40'oc. I will be using the max reinf ratio of 0.005 per ACI 350 in walls and slab.
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
And knowing some members of the ACI 350 committee, they don't use any loose semantics. When they say expansion joints, they want a joint with a defined gap that can accomodate growth.
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
Good point. Tanks can be down for repairs for months.
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
Expansion joints are designed to accommodate growth from temperature deltas whereas construction joints come from scheduled interruptions in concrete pouring (e.g. slabs), but at the end of the day both types of joints represent discontinuities in the slab that must be waterproofed and sealed. So, if the figure shows the typical expansion joint, how different is a construction joint from a detailing point of view?
Thanks.
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
I found this FAQ on PCA's website: Q: Joints: What Type are Used and Where?
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
We like to use a 1.5 FS for this case. Don't count on the soil pressure on the back of the wall.
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
Vibration. Split form. Requires careful workmanship. See attached photo.
You can download the slide decks from a waterstop workshop here: http:
Pay attention to Waterstop Formwork (PPT; 5234 KB). All the other PPTs and PDFs are also interesting.
Another waterstop vendor with technical info: http
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
The joint in fa2070's post is not to scale so it exaggerates the problem. These waterstops are usually 6 to 9 inches wide, while the mat is often 27 inches thick or more. The picture makes it look like the waterstop extends 15 inches into each slab.
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
I agree with that, but I think some folks do attempt what is shown to scale in fa2070's post.
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
By the way, I incorporated your suggestion (I think it was yours) of concentrating horizontal temperature reinforcing at the bottom of a tank wall, and it eliminated cracks at that location. Great idea.
RE: Concrete Tank w/o Joints-ACI 350
And a great result. Yes, that is a line I try to preach as often as I get the chance. Just an example of trying to think like the material...the cracks seem to form here...I think there is a need for more bars here.