×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

California Renewable Feed-in-Tariff

California Renewable Feed-in-Tariff

California Renewable Feed-in-Tariff

(OP)
I have been asked to review proposed changes to the California Public Utilities Commission Feed-in-Tariff, specifically the allowable size of PV systems that can be interconnected to distribution systems.  Note that these proposed changes are under consideration as a result of increasing the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) to 33% w/o requiring the construction of new transmission lines.

Previous review limited the max. size of DG (all generators) resources to 15% of the peak load at the point of interconnection.  Consideration is being given to increasing the max. size limit of PV only systems to 30% of the peak load at the point of interconnection.  The rationale is that peak PV output coincides to a large degree with the peak loading on distribution feeders.

It does not appear that any significant testing / analysis of this proposed change has been made to date.  It sounds reasonable to me.  Any thoughts?

RE: California Renewable Feed-in-Tariff

Why is the number so low, even at 30%?

I know that in Sarnia, Ontario they've connected around 20MW of solar PV to a feeder (which is probably much larger than the peak load on the feeder).

As long as voltage regulation isn't a problem, and as long as there aren't any islanding problems, they should be able to generate as much as they like without any adverse effects on the system. PV inverters generally make for pretty good citizens on a distribution feeder.

RE: California Renewable Feed-in-Tariff

Quote (redfurry):

PV inverters generally make for pretty good citizens on a distribution feeder.
Never had to deal with voltage regulation on a long, multi-branched rural distribution feeder, have you?  Try putting more PV on one branch than the entire circuit load and look at what happens to the voltage regulation for other branches.

RE: California Renewable Feed-in-Tariff

Quote (davidbeach):
"Never had to deal with voltage regulation on a long, multi-branched rural distribution feeder, have you?"


Actually I have, which is why I noted that the only major obstacle to installing PV is voltage regulation.

On urban feeders voltage regulation just isn't a problem and even large installations of PV pose very few issues.

On a stringy rural feeder, no amount of generation is safe and the effects on voltage will vary dramatically depending on existing load and generation location.

I dislike the kind of rule where the regulator says that generation equal to X% of load is allowed.
As the saying goes: One size fits all ... badly.

RE: California Renewable Feed-in-Tariff

The limit seems strange to me also. In my area there is no specific limit, so long as it doesn't cause power quality or voltage problems. But then we don't have a lot of PV in Kansas.

Alan
----
"It's always fun to do the impossible." - Walt Disney

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources