×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Misapplication of Parallel Relief Valves

Misapplication of Parallel Relief Valves

Misapplication of Parallel Relief Valves

(OP)
It recently came to my attention that several operating companies are opening parallel, 100% sized, relief valves to the process when the design was to leave one closed and one open to facilitate maintenance. This is apparently becoming a standard practice.

Normal sizing practice involves finding the highest relief capacity required and selecting a valve with at least that capacity.  It is good practice not to size too large and 140% maximum is a good rule of thumb.

There are two scenarios where dual relief valves are installed.  One involves two valves with staggered setpoints and a combined capacity of 100+%.  This is not the subject of this Thread.  The 2nd scenario is where two 100+% valves are installed and one is intended as a spare.

When parallel relief valves are installed in this manner and each is sized for 100+% of required capacity, the intent is to provide a spare that is closed to the process; this facilitates maintenance and testing.

It is very bad practice, (even dangerous practice), to open both of these valves to the process. In all fairness, this is done because it is perceived to be safer. In reality, it is not - it is less safe.

Without going into detail here, flare loading and pipe stress calculations are made based on P&ID's and the philosophy at the time of design.  To open both valves to the process when this was not intended can result in a number of unwanted consequences to included:

- Transient Flare System overload - Capacity and Pressure
- Pipe Support Damage
- Relief pipe damage
- Damage to relief valves
- Less than required relief capacity *!*
- Liability: Plant Operating not in accordance with approved P&ID's *!*


Please see my paper on this subject @

http://www.scribd.com/doc/18656992/Relief-Valves-in-Parallel

or, see attached

v/r
jrlaw

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources