×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Horizontal Irregularity 1a (ASCE7-05)

Horizontal Irregularity 1a (ASCE7-05)

Horizontal Irregularity 1a (ASCE7-05)

(OP)
Does anyone know of an exception based on the magnitude of the story drift?  I have a two-story building with special concentric braced frames relatively symmetrical, seismic design category D.  When I calculate the Torsional Irregularity, I am outside of the 1.2 limit, but the seismic drifts are very small, around H/600.  

For example: Assume 18 feet from the second floor to the roof.  One corner has a story drift of 0.36", the other corner drifts 0.23".  The average drift x 1.2 = 0.354".  This would be defined as Torsionally Irregular even though the maximum story drift is less than 3/8".  That seems ridiculous.  Am I missing something?  Seems like there should be an exception for when the magnitude of the story drift is very small.   

RE: Horizontal Irregularity 1a (ASCE7-05)

(OP)
Anyone have thoughts on this?

RE: Horizontal Irregularity 1a (ASCE7-05)

I don't understand how a relatively symmetric building (assuming relative symmetric mass distribution) can be outside the 1.2 limit.

I take it you've applied the 5% accidental eccentricity and that is the cause of your torsion.  If so, then I think you've got a structure that's relatively sensitive to torsion. It's borderline, but it's there....  How much additional eccentricity (beyond the 5%) is required for such a borderline case?

RE: Horizontal Irregularity 1a (ASCE7-05)

(OP)
JoshPlum, thanks for the reply.  It isn't perfectly symmetrical, but close.  And yes, the 5% accidental eccentricity is applied.  

My point is that when the magnitude of the drift is very small, there does not have to be much difference from one corner to the other to exceed the 1.2 limit.  As shown in the previous example, just over 1/8" difference from one corner to the other.  For a building of any size, that's a tiny torsional movement.  Seems like there should be an exception based on the actual magnitude of the drift.

Sorry, I don't understand your question "How much additional eccentricity (beyond the 5%) is required for such a borderline case?"  

RE: Horizontal Irregularity 1a (ASCE7-05)

My question just took your calculation 1 step further.  From Section 12.8.4.3 of ASCE:

Ax = multiplier for accidental torsion = (delta_max/1.2*delta_avg)^2  = 1.034

Therefore, your 5% accidental eccentricity becomes a 5.17% eccentricity with the additional amplification.  That's a very minor ammplification of the accidental torsion.  It's pratically within the roundoff error of the calculations.  

 

RE: Horizontal Irregularity 1a (ASCE7-05)

(OP)
I see your point that it doesn't amplify much in Section 12.8.4.3.  But the other reference sections of Table 12.3-1 come into play also, such as the Increase in Forces and for higher Occupancy Categories whether Equivalent Lateral Force is allowed (Table 12.6-1).



  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources