Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
Join Eng-Tips Forums
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login




Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Join Us!

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.
Jobs from Indeed

Link To This Forum!

Partner Button
Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

geostability (Structural) (OP)
1 Sep 09 7:23
In all of the responses addressing EFP, I have seen that al of the descriptions always seem to refer to finding the Equivalent Fluid Pressure based on a value given in a geotechnical report. My question is where does that value in the report come from and how is it generated? If the report says "use 60 pcf" for the EFP, how was that value calculated?
oldestguy (Geotechnical)
1 Sep 09 10:12
We usually use the Rankine equations.

If  you look up on Google the name Rankine, you may get some info that is not related to lateral earth pressure, but try this link.

Rankine seems to have been very busy figuring out formulas for many engineering subjects.

http://www.uwplatt.edu/~meyersm/wetzel/ce473ch5/ch5a.htm

Also, check out the lateral earth pressure info from the work of Peck in Chicago.  It is not always an triangular distribution.
Helpful Member!(2)  dgillette (Geotechnical)
1 Sep 09 11:59
I'd like to see us drop the use of "equivalent fluid pressure," and do something more fundamentally grounded in soil mechanics, such as active pressure (based on bouyant unit weight plus hydrostatic pressure below the WT).  We're not dealing with a fluid, and the results don't always fit the model of "equivalent fluid pressure."  Soil is a solid that exerts a pressure that depends on placement/compaction and wall stiffness.  Pressures change with changes in the water table.

It ain't hard - you all did it as undergrads.

DRG
geostability (Structural) (OP)
1 Sep 09 15:07
I agree with dgillette's suggestion that we do away with Equivalent Fluid Pressure. I have several recent editions of certain geotechnical engineering text books, and not a single one of them even mentions "Equivalent Fluid Pressure". The soil mechanics equations and procedures seem to have been worked out without "Divine Inspiration" to come up with a nefarious number in a project geatech report.
hokie66 (Structural)
1 Sep 09 22:35
Amen, DRG.  A lot of young engineers think earth pressures are like water, and don't seem to understand that they can be greater than hydrostatic.
BigH (Geotechnical)
2 Sep 09 2:23
. . . and not triangular!
oldestguy (Geotechnical)
3 Sep 09 18:02
However, when will structural engineers gladly accept the  more "complicated" pressure distributions?  In my experience, the simpler it is, the more they go for it. In some cases, even when very simply stated, they don't understand it.

That usually seems to come about when a long, very detailed geotech report is written and the meat of what is needed is buried in a long bunch of words.

In retrospect, when has the use of EFP caused a failure?

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close