on wind turbines, which is more efficient, a 2-blade or a 3-blade?
on wind turbines, which is more efficient, a 2-blade or a 3-blade?
(OP)
in wind turbines:
1. which is more efficient, a 2-blade or a 3-blade?
2. which is more efficient, a blade with a root to tip twist or one with none? at what angle would be more efficient, if ever?
3. when you specify power regulation as either pitch or stall, which would be more efficient?
4. can we classify blade tip air brake and yaw brake as power regulation and should therefore be consistent with the bidder's power regulation offer?
appreciate your advises and should wind assessment data be needed for a clear reply, then am sorry i could not provide that. i have come to trust this forum more than our lowest bidder consultants. thank you again indeed.
1. which is more efficient, a 2-blade or a 3-blade?
2. which is more efficient, a blade with a root to tip twist or one with none? at what angle would be more efficient, if ever?
3. when you specify power regulation as either pitch or stall, which would be more efficient?
4. can we classify blade tip air brake and yaw brake as power regulation and should therefore be consistent with the bidder's power regulation offer?
appreciate your advises and should wind assessment data be needed for a clear reply, then am sorry i could not provide that. i have come to trust this forum more than our lowest bidder consultants. thank you again indeed.





RE: on wind turbines, which is more efficient, a 2-blade or a 3-blade?
For a wind turbine the following are possible definitions
average kWh per year produced per $ invested
proportion of the available windpower that is turned into electricity
RoI
etc etc
Until you know that, the technical details are irrelevant.
Cheers
Greg Locock
SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.
RE: on wind turbines, which is more efficient, a 2-blade or a 3-blade?
And if you figure out the relationship between the wind velocity vector and the tip velocity vector at the root and at the tip, you will find that if you want a comparable angle of attack into the wind, a root-to-tip twist is absolutely necessary and is found on every good design. Take a look at an airplane propeller from the 1930's, this is not new.
I don't know enough about the topic to answer the third and fourth questions.
And the above post is correct; in most applications like this "efficiency of dollars spent" is more appropriate than the thermodynamic definition.
RE: on wind turbines, which is more efficient, a 2-blade or a 3-blade?
Or Orville & Wilbur's original Wright Flyer propellors, from ~1902.
Or ship propellors from the late 1800's.
RE: on wind turbines, which is more efficient, a 2-blade or a 3-blade?
Also, a similar question was asked not so long ago, hunt around for it.
I see lots of 2 blade wind turbines every week. They are mostly used for water pumps I believe, but they are still 2 blades.
KENAT,
Have you reminded yourself of FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies recently, or taken a look at posting policies: http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?
RE: on wind turbines, which is more efficient, a 2-blade or a 3-blade?
2 blades are more efficient in terms of structural mass for area swept but do have different failure modes but these guys seem to do them alright http://www.windflow.co.nz
The only time you are would have no blade twist is if its a vertical axis wind turbine, the range of angle of flow is something like 60 degrees from root to tip
Stall regulation verses pitch, my only comment would be that stall regulation is likely to be better at preventing wind gust overloads, but dependent on the aerofoil used could lose a lot of power from the reduction in angle of attack required to reattach the flow (the proper term escapes my spell this morning).
Got no insight in to 4
Be aware that there are large differences between island (enven large islands) & continental sites, partiiculay issues caused by wind gusts.
RE: on wind turbines, which is more efficient, a 2-blade or a 3-blade?
The US DOE built a rather large and expensive single blade wind turbine during the 1970s - 1980s.
In the real world, additional considerations come into play, as mentioned by others within this post, to evolve the designs into the most practical configuration. This is currently a three blade configuration, with two blade turbines at a close second place.
Consider the "American" type windmill, the only practical machine for farm duty of several decades past. It had very many blades, and a generally low efficiency. However it had good starting torque, and hence was the most practical device for running reciprocating well pumps in rural America.
RE: on wind turbines, which is more efficient, a 2-blade or a 3-blade?
RE: on wind turbines, which is more efficient, a 2-blade or a 3-blade?
2. Minimum surface area (minimum skin friction drag) for the same swept area, i.e. fewer blades = less skin friction.
RE: on wind turbines, which is more efficient, a 2-blade or a 3-blade?
if you don't know then look at where the different designs (vertical axis, horizontal axis, 2-blade, 3-blade) are being implemented at figure out what the applications were trying to accomplish (minimising which cost varible) and then ...
1) were they effective in meeting the design goal ?
2) how does this apply to your project ?
RE: on wind turbines, which is more efficient, a 2-blade or a 3-blade?
RE: on wind turbines, which is more efficient, a 2-blade or a 3-blade?
The other related advantage (or limit, depending on how you view things) about a vertical turbine on floating sea buoy is the relatively small vertical height required: A vertical windmill is less efficient than a high-tower-mounted "classic" two or three bladed propeller-type unit, but it can receive winds from any direction without twisting or wrapping the buoy's anchor chain around. Also, no tall tower is required = The buoy doesn't tip over and is more stable. Coastal winds tend to be steadier than inland breezes, and of course there are no buildings or mountains nearby, so overall, there is more of a chance of getting "some" wind than you'd get at a roadside sign or hilly location with lots of trees.
The top of the turbine blades in a vertical unit are close to the ground, obviously the mid-point of the blades are at half that height, and winds close to the ground are less = less "apparent" efficiency than in a tower facility, but the design is better under actual installed conditions.
RE: on wind turbines, which is more efficient, a 2-blade or a 3-blade?
RE: on wind turbines, which is more efficient, a 2-blade or a 3-blade?
But the noise problems are very bad - or "very good" - depending on how well you like sleeping. And how much you hate/dislike/like/want/love the "ideals" of wind power.
Imagine a one-blade prop going "whoooooosh..........whooooosh..........whooooosh..........whooooosh..........whooooosh..........whooooosh..........whooooosh..........whooooosh..........whooooosh..........whooooosh..........whooooosh..........whooooosh..........whooooosh" for the next five years (Until it breaks down.)
Then compare that low frequency, slow ranging noise to a three-blade prop's faster but slightly higher frequency
"whooosh...whooosh...whooosh...whooosh...whooosh...whooosh...whooosh...whooosh...whooosh...whooosh...whooosh...whooosh...whooosh...whooosh...whooosh...whooosh...