×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

API 521 Eq (4)

API 521 Eq (4)

API 521 Eq (4)

(OP)

Equation (4) of API 521 suggests a calculation of cubic expansion coefficient as:

alpha_v =  (rho_2)^2 - (rho_1)^2
                   -------------------------------
                  2 x dT x rho_2 x rho_1


However if I do the same calc from first principles, I get:

alpha_v = (rho_2 - rho_1) x 2
                 --------------------------
                 dT x (rho_2 + rho_1)


Numerically, these turn out to be really close but, I don't understand why is there a difference in the relations. What am I missing?

RE: API 521 Eq (4)

(OP)
Edit to the last post: The signs in the numerators should be reversed in both relations.

Also, I do not have access to Perry's. Please describe the reasoning behind the difference in these relations.

RE: API 521 Eq (4)

(OP)
Does anyone have an idea what I am on about here?

RE: API 521 Eq (4)

(OP)
Wow, the silence is deafening.  

RE: API 521 Eq (4)

htlyst:

I have an old edition of API RP 521.  (1999).

Forgive me accordingly...but the Equation #4 therein contained has nothing at all to do with a cubic expansion coefficient.  I wanted nonetheless to look into this and do the derivation myself so that I could provide a constructive post here.

I regret that, as it is, the only thing I can offer takes the correctness of your post at face value.  If one accepts that, and then if I see two equations, one with a term in the form of (a^2 - b^2) and the other with a term in the form of (a + b), I immediately look for some difference or error in the algebra regarding how the "sums and differences of squares" are handled.  If you feel one or the other equations is in doubt, my first inclination is to look there.

I am sorry I am unable to be of more help with the information I have at my disposal.

Regards,

SNORGY.

RE: API 521 Eq (4)

(OP)
SNORGY,

Thank you for your response. I have included a screenshot of the latest API 521 as an attachment.

I actually did try deriving Equation 4 and was able to. The only thing I had done differently was to substitute 1/rho = v (sp. vol.) at a different step in the derivation.

I have posted my derivations and results in another forum at:
http://www.cheresources.com/invision/index.php?/topic/8778-equation-4-of-api-521/ (click on thumbnails)

While I can explain what causes difference, I still don't know  why is there a difference. Does anyone know?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources